University Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, University Hospital and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;106(2):255-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq301. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
Performing spermatic cord block for scrotal surgery avoids the potential risks of neuraxial and general anaesthesia and provides long-lasting postoperative analgesia. A blindly performed block is often inefficient and bears its own potential risks (intravascular injection of local anaesthetics, haematoma formation and perforation of the deferent duct). The use of ultrasound may help to overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and monitor the success rate of a new ultrasound-guided spermatic cord block.
Twenty consecutive patients undergoing urologic surgery (subcapsular orchiectomy or vaso-vasostomy) were included in this prospective study. Using a linear ultrasound probe, the spermatic cord was identified by locating the spermatic artery and the deferent duct. A 23 G Microlance needle was advanced close to the deferent duct by avoiding vessel perforation, and local anaesthetic was deposited around the deferent duct under direct visualization. The primary outcome was the success rate of the block which was defined as surgery without any substitution of opioids, additional local anaesthetics, or sedatives.
In 20 patients, 40 blocks were performed with a success rate of 95% (n=38). The failure rate was 5% (n=2) and no conversion to general anaesthesia was needed. The mean duration of the block was 14.1 h (sd 6.9).
The use of ultrasound guidance to perform spermatic cord block is feasible and has a high success rate. Our new approach may become a suitable alternative to neuraxial or general anaesthesia especially in the ambulatory surgical setting.
在阴囊手术中进行精索阻滞可以避免脊麻和全身麻醉的潜在风险,并提供持久的术后镇痛。盲目进行阻滞通常效率不高,且存在自身潜在风险(局部麻醉药的血管内注射、血肿形成和输精管道穿孔)。超声的使用可能有助于克服这些缺点。本研究旨在测试新的超声引导精索阻滞的可行性并监测其成功率。
连续纳入 20 例接受泌尿外科手术(睾丸包膜下切除术或输精管吻合术)的患者。使用线性超声探头,通过定位精索动脉和输精管道来识别精索。将 23G 的 Microlance 针靠近输精管道推进,避免血管穿孔,并在直接可视化下将局部麻醉剂注入输精管道周围。主要结局是阻滞的成功率,定义为手术无需使用任何阿片类药物、额外的局部麻醉剂或镇静剂。
在 20 例患者中,共进行了 40 次阻滞,成功率为 95%(n=38)。失败率为 5%(n=2),无需转为全身麻醉。阻滞的平均持续时间为 14.1 小时(标准差 6.9)。
使用超声引导进行精索阻滞是可行的,且成功率高。我们的新方法可能成为脊麻或全身麻醉的合适替代方法,尤其是在门诊手术环境中。