• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品说明书中过多的医学信息增加。

Excessive medical information increase in package inserts.

作者信息

Fuchs J, Werner S, Scheunpflug C, Götze E A, Elstermann K, Scheffel K, Domnowski A, Peter G, Hertzsch C, Hippius M

机构信息

PAINT-Consult®, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;48(12):781-90. doi: 10.5414/cpp48781.

DOI:10.5414/cpp48781
PMID:21084033
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Package inserts are the most frequent source of patient information about medicines aside from doctors and pharmacists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A representative selection of 271 German package inserts available in 2005 was investigated, using 152 validated quality criteria and by measuring 242 further values.

RESULTS

A significant increase in package insert texts over recent years was found; standing at an average of 2,005 words. This is associated with the significant increase in complicated medical information being communicated; with on an average of 114.1 difficult words and 46.3 non quantifiable phrases per package insert. Only 60.1% of the package inserts offered all dosages as number of tablets or other amounts of the ready to use medicine, while just 29.5% listed the maximum daily dose for all users. 54.6% provided actions for all possible side effects and 24.2% the frequencies of side effects in numerical form.

CONCLUSION

The significantly increased volume of medical information provided in package inserts does not meet the requirements of patients. Major efforts are required by pharmaceutical companies, authorities and legislative bodies in order to reduce information to that which is essential for patients and to ensure that this is provided in short, precise and easily comprehensible texts.

摘要

目的

除医生和药剂师外,药品说明书是患者获取药品信息最常见的来源。

材料与方法

对2005年可得的271份德国药品说明书进行了代表性抽样调查,采用152条经过验证的质量标准并测量另外242个数值。

结果

发现近年来药品说明书的文字显著增加;平均有2005个单词。这与所传达的复杂医学信息显著增加相关;每份药品说明书平均有114.1个难词和46.3个不可量化的短语。只有60.1%的药品说明书提供了所有剂型的片数或其他即用药品的用量,而仅有29.5%列出了所有使用者的最大日剂量。54.6%说明了所有可能副作用的应对措施,24.2%以数字形式列出了副作用的发生率。

结论

药品说明书中提供的医学信息量显著增加,但未达到患者的需求。制药公司、当局和立法机构需要做出重大努力,以便将信息精简至对患者至关重要的内容,并确保以简短、精确且易于理解的文字提供这些信息。

相似文献

1
Excessive medical information increase in package inserts.药品说明书中过多的医学信息增加。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;48(12):781-90. doi: 10.5414/cpp48781.
2
Analysis of German package inserts.德国药品说明书分析。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):8-13. doi: 10.5414/cpp44008.
3
Inappropriate dosage instructions in package inserts.药品说明书中的剂量说明不当。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jul;67(1-2):157-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.009. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
4
[Drug package inserts--varying information for the same medicines].[药品说明书——同一药物的不同信息]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013 May 7;133(9):955-9. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.1272.
5
Clinical information in drug package inserts in India.印度药品说明书中的临床信息。
J Postgrad Med. 2009 Apr-Jun;55(2):104-7. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.52840.
6
[A 30-year history of the change in package insert for Japanese pharmaceutical medicines].[日本药品说明书30年的变迁史]
Yakushigaku Zasshi. 2004;39(2):276-85.
7
[Research on Insufficient Information for Pharmaceutical Products].
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2017;137(12):1497-1504. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.17-00164.
8
Conformity of package inserts information to regulatory requirements among selected branded and generic medicinal products circulating on the East African market.在东非市场流通的选定品牌和仿制药的药品说明书信息与监管要求的一致性。
PLoS One. 2018 May 22;13(5):e0197490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197490. eCollection 2018.
9
Medicine package inserts from the users' perspective: are they read and understood?从用户角度看药品说明书:它们会被阅读并理解吗?
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2019 Mar 14;22:e190009. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720190009.
10
[The development and operation of a package inserts service system for electronic medical records].[电子病历药品说明书服务系统的开发与运行]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2003 Mar;123(3):201-9. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.123.201.

引用本文的文献

1
Worth the paper they are printed on? Findings from an independent evaluation of the understandability of patient information leaflets for antiseizure medications.纸上谈兵?抗癫痫药物患者信息传单易懂性的独立评估结果。
Epilepsia. 2022 Aug;63(8):2130-2143. doi: 10.1111/epi.17299. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
Thai Patients' Drug Safety Knowledge and Perceptions Relating to Different Forms of Written Medicine Information: A Comparative Study.泰国患者对不同形式书面药物信息的药物安全知识与认知:一项比较研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Apr 29;16:1141-1152. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S361447. eCollection 2022.
3
Readability assessment of package leaflets of biosimilars.
生物类似药说明书的可读性评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e024837. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024837.
4
Readability Analysis of the Package Leaflets for Biological Medicines Available on the Internet Between 2007 and 2013: An Analytical Longitudinal Study.2007年至2013年互联网上生物药品包装说明书的可读性分析:一项纵向分析研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 25;18(5):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5145.
5
Readability of medicinal package leaflets: a systematic review.药品说明书的可读性:一项系统综述。
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:4. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005559. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
6
Package leaflets of the most consumed medicines in Portugal: safety and regulatory compliance issues. A descriptive study.葡萄牙最常用药品的包装说明书:安全性与法规遵循问题。一项描述性研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2015 Mar-Apr;133(2):91-100. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2013.7860023. Epub 2014 Oct 17.