BioMedware, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jan 15;173(2):236-43. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq350. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
A key problem facing epidemiologists who wish to account for residential mobility in their analyses is the cost and difficulty of obtaining residential histories. Commercial residential history data of acceptable accuracy, cost, and coverage would be of great value. The present research evaluated the accuracy of residential histories from LexisNexis, Inc. The authors chose LexisNexis because the Michigan Cancer Registry has considered using their data, they have excellent procedures for privacy protection, and they make available residential histories at 25 cents per person. Only first and last name and address at last-known residence are required to access the residential history. The authors compared lifetime residential histories collected through the use of written surveys in a case-control study of bladder cancer in Michigan to the 3 residential addresses routinely available in the address history from LexisNexis. The LexisNexis address matches, as a whole, accounted for 71.5% of participants' lifetime addresses. These results provided a level of accuracy that indicates routine use of residential histories from commercial vendors is feasible. More detailed residential histories are available at a higher cost but were not analyzed in this study. Although higher accuracy is desirable, LexisNexis data are a vast improvement over the assumption of immobile individuals currently used in many spatial and spatiotemporal studies.
面临的一个关键问题,希望在他们的分析中考虑居住流动性的流行病学家是成本和获得居住史的难度。具有可接受的准确性、成本和覆盖范围的商业居住史数据将具有巨大的价值。本研究评估了 LexisNexis,Inc. 的居住史的准确性。作者选择 LexisNexis 是因为密歇根癌症登记处一直在考虑使用他们的数据,他们有很好的隐私保护程序,而且他们以每人 25 美分的价格提供居住史。访问居住史只需要最后已知住所的姓名和地址。作者将通过在密歇根州膀胱癌病例对照研究中使用书面调查收集的终身居住史与 LexisNexis 地址历史记录中通常可用的 3 个居住地址进行了比较。LexisNexis 的地址匹配总体上占参与者终身地址的 71.5%。这些结果表明,常规使用商业供应商的居住史是可行的,具有一定的准确性。本研究没有分析更详细的居住史,但需要更高的成本。虽然更高的准确性是理想的,但 LexisNexis 数据比目前许多空间和时空研究中使用的假设不动人群有了很大的改进。