Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 9500 Euclid Ave. ND20, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
J Neural Eng. 2010 Dec;7(6):066008. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/6/066008. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for the treatment of a wide range of neurological disorders. Historically, DBS and other neurostimulation technologies have relied on rectangular stimulation waveforms to impose their effects on the nervous system. Recent work has suggested that non-rectangular waveforms may have advantages over the traditional rectangular pulse. Therefore, we used detailed computer models to compare a range of charge-balanced biphasic waveforms with rectangular, exponential, triangular, Gaussian and sinusoidal stimulus pulse shapes. We explored the neural activation energy of these waveforms for both intracellular and extracellular current-controlled stimulation conditions. In the context of extracellular stimulation, we compared their effects on both axonal fibers of passage and projection neurons. Finally, we evaluated the impact of delivering the waveforms through a clinical DBS electrode, as opposed to a theoretical point source. Our results suggest that DBS with a 1 ms centered-triangular pulse can decrease energy consumption by 64% when compared with the standard 100 µs rectangular pulse (energy cost of 48 and 133 nJ, respectively, to stimulate 50% of a distributed population of axons) and can decrease energy consumption by 10% when compared with the most energy efficient rectangular pulse (1.25 ms duration). In turn, there may be measureable energy savings when using appropriately designed non-rectangular pulses in clinical DBS applications, thereby warranting further experimental investigation.
脑深部电刺激(DBS)是治疗广泛的神经障碍的一种既定疗法。从历史上看,DBS 和其他神经刺激技术依赖于矩形刺激波形来对神经系统施加影响。最近的工作表明,非矩形波形可能比传统的矩形脉冲具有优势。因此,我们使用详细的计算机模型比较了一系列电荷平衡双相波形与矩形、指数、三角、高斯和正弦刺激脉冲形状。我们探索了这些波形在细胞内和细胞外电流控制刺激条件下的神经激活能量。在细胞外刺激的情况下,我们比较了它们对通过纤维的轴突纤维和投射神经元的影响。最后,我们评估了通过临床 DBS 电极而不是理论点源传递波形的影响。我们的结果表明,与标准的 100µs 矩形脉冲相比,使用 1ms 中心三角形脉冲进行 DBS 可以将能量消耗降低 64%(分别刺激分布的轴突群体的 50%,能量消耗为 48 和 133nJ),并且与最节能的矩形脉冲相比,能量消耗降低 10%(1.25ms 持续时间)。反过来,在临床 DBS 应用中使用适当设计的非矩形脉冲可能会有可测量的节能效果,因此值得进一步的实验研究。