Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚卫生和医学研究中消费者参与的现状、挑战和促进因素。

Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research.

机构信息

Centre for Health Research & Psycho-oncology (CHeRP), Cancer Council NSW, The University of Newcastle & Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan NSW, Australia, 2308.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2010 Nov 18;8:34. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-8-34.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The emergent international practice of involving consumers in health research is driven, in part, by the growing share of health research that can only be applied in and emerge from knowledge that is shaped by human values and societal contexts. This is the first investigation of its kind to identify the current prevalence, challenges, enabling factors and range of approaches to consumer involvement in health and medical research in Australia.

METHODS

A nation-wide survey of research funding organisations and organisations that conduct research was performed during 2008-2009.

RESULTS

Marked variation in consumer involvement experience and perceptions exists between research funders and researchers. Research funders were over eight times more likely than organisations conducting research to involve consumers in identifying research needs and prioritising research topics. Across both groups, practical and time constraints were reported as key challenges to involving consumers, while guidelines on consumer involvement and evidence of effect were the most important potential enablers. More than a third of research organisations indicated that when consumer involvement was a condition of research funding, it was an important facilitator of involvement.

CONCLUSION

It is no longer simply enough to keep society informed of important scientific breakthroughs. If Australian health research is to take into account important social contexts and consequences, it must involve consumers. A set of minimum consumer involvement standards and associated guidelines, that are agreed and routinely adopted, could ensure that consumers and the Australian community they represent, are given an opportunity to shed light on experiences and local circumstance, and express views and concerns relevant to health research.

摘要

背景

消费者参与健康研究的新兴国际实践部分是由以下原因驱动的,即越来越多的健康研究只能应用于并源于受人类价值观和社会背景影响的知识。这是首次对澳大利亚消费者参与健康和医学研究的当前流行程度、挑战、促成因素和方法范围进行的调查。

方法

在 2008-2009 年期间,对研究资助机构和开展研究的组织进行了全国范围的调查。

结果

研究资助者和研究人员在消费者参与经验和看法方面存在明显差异。研究资助者比开展研究的组织更有可能让消费者参与确定研究需求和优先考虑研究课题,其可能性是后者的八倍多。在这两个群体中,报告的主要挑战是实际和时间限制,而消费者参与指南和效果证据是最重要的潜在促成因素。超过三分之一的研究组织表示,当消费者参与是研究资金的条件时,它是促进参与的重要因素。

结论

仅仅让社会了解重要的科学突破已经不够了。如果澳大利亚的健康研究要考虑到重要的社会背景和后果,就必须让消费者参与进来。一套经过同意并常规采用的最低限度消费者参与标准和相关指南,可以确保消费者和他们所代表的澳大利亚社区有机会阐明经验和当地情况,并就健康研究表达相关意见和关切。

相似文献

9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research.健康研究人员对公众参与健康研究的态度。
Health Expect. 2009 Jun;12(2):209-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00532.x. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
3
Beyond scientific rigour: funding cancer research of public value.超越科学严谨性:资助具有公共价值的癌症研究。
Health Policy. 2007 Dec;84(2-3):234-42. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
8
The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research?患者的经验性知识:生物医学研究的新资源?
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jun;60(11):2575-84. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.023. Epub 2004 Dec 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验