Dewhurst Stephen A, Pursglove Rhian C, Lewis Charlie
Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Dev Sci. 2007 May;10(3):374-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00592.x.
False recognition in children aged 5, 8, and 11 years was investigated using the standard version of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) procedure and an alternative version in which the DRM stimuli were embedded in stories designed to emphasize their overall theme. Relative to the 8- and 11-year-olds, the 5-year-olds falsely recognized fewer critical lures when the DRM stimuli were presented in lists, but falsely recognized more critical lures when the stimuli were presented in stories. Levels of false recognition in the 8- and 11-year-olds were not affected by study format. We argue that the story context enhanced the ability of the 5-year-olds to make inferences based on the theme of the DRM stimuli. The 5-year-olds then showed higher levels of false recognition than the older children owing to their inability to reject lure words consistent with the stories.
使用标准版本的迪耶斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特(DRM)程序以及一个替代版本,对5岁、8岁和11岁儿童的错误识别进行了研究。在替代版本中,DRM刺激被嵌入旨在强调其整体主题的故事中。相对于8岁和11岁的儿童,当DRM刺激以列表形式呈现时,5岁的儿童错误识别的关键诱饵较少,但当刺激以故事形式呈现时,5岁儿童错误识别的关键诱饵更多。8岁和11岁儿童的错误识别水平不受研究形式的影响。我们认为,故事背景增强了5岁儿童基于DRM刺激主题进行推理的能力。由于5岁儿童无法拒绝与故事一致的诱饵词,因此他们表现出比年龄较大儿童更高水平的错误识别。