Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Ind. 46202, USA.
Caries Res. 2011;45(1):3-12. doi: 10.1159/000321657. Epub 2010 Dec 11.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Currently available techniques for fluoride analysis are not standardized. Therefore, this study was designed to develop standardized methods for analyzing fluoride in biological and nonbiological samples used for dental research.
A group of nine laboratories analyzed a set of standardized samples for fluoride concentration using their own methods. The group then reviewed existing analytical techniques for fluoride analysis, identified inconsistencies in the use of these techniques and conducted testing to resolve differences. Based on the results of the testing undertaken to define the best approaches for the analysis, the group developed recommendations for direct and microdiffusion methods using the fluoride ion-selective electrode.
Initial results demonstrated that there was no consensus regarding the choice of analytical techniques for different types of samples. Although for several types of samples, the results of the fluoride analyses were similar among some laboratories, greater differences were observed for saliva, food and beverage samples. In spite of these initial differences, precise and true values of fluoride concentration, as well as smaller differences between laboratories, were obtained once the standardized methodologies were used. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.90 to 0.93, for the analysis of a certified reference material, using the standardized methodologies.
The results of this study demonstrate that the development and use of standardized protocols for F analysis significantly decreased differences among laboratories and resulted in more precise and true values.
背景/目的:目前可用于氟化物分析的技术尚未标准化。因此,本研究旨在为牙科研究中使用的生物和非生物样本中的氟化物分析制定标准化方法。
一组九个实验室使用各自的方法分析了一组标准化的氟化物浓度样本。然后,该小组审查了现有的氟化物分析技术,确定了这些技术使用中的不一致之处,并进行了测试以解决差异。根据确定最佳分析方法的测试结果,该小组为使用氟离子选择性电极的直接和微扩散方法制定了建议。
初步结果表明,对于不同类型的样本,分析技术的选择没有共识。尽管对于几种类型的样本,一些实验室的氟化物分析结果相似,但唾液、食物和饮料样本的差异更大。尽管存在这些初始差异,但一旦使用标准化方法,就可以获得氟化物浓度的精确和真实值以及实验室之间更小的差异。使用标准化方法分析认证参考物质时,组内相关系数范围为 0.90 至 0.93。
本研究的结果表明,氟化物分析标准化协议的制定和使用显著降低了实验室之间的差异,并且产生了更精确和真实的值。