• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Never too old for anonymity: a statistical standard for demographic data sharing via the HIPAA Privacy Rule.永远不要因为年龄而放弃匿名:通过 HIPAA 隐私规则共享人口统计数据的统计标准。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):3-10. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004622.
2
Evaluating re-identification risks with respect to the HIPAA privacy rule.评估 HIPAA 隐私规则下的重新识别风险。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):169-77. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000026.
3
R-U policy frontiers for health data de-identification.健康数据去识别化的R-U政策前沿
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Sep;22(5):1029-41. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv004. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
4
Building public trust in uses of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act de-identified data.建立公众对健康保险携带和责任法案去识别数据使用的信任。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):29-34. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000936. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
5
De-identification and the sharing of big data.去识别化与大数据共享。
J AHIMA. 2013 Apr;84(4):44-7.
6
Doctors Routinely Share Health Data Electronically Under HIPAA, and Sharing With Patients and Patients' Third-Party Health Apps is Consistent: Interoperability and Privacy Analysis.根据 HIPAA 规定,医生通常会以电子方式共享健康数据,与患者及其患者第三方健康应用程序共享数据也是符合规定的:互操作性和隐私分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 2;22(9):e19818. doi: 10.2196/19818.
7
Image data sharing for biomedical research--meeting HIPAA requirements for De-identification.用于生物医学研究的图像数据共享--满足 HIPAA 对去识别化的要求。
J Digit Imaging. 2012 Feb;25(1):14-24. doi: 10.1007/s10278-011-9422-x.
8
Privacy as an enabler, not an impediment: building trust into health information exchange.将隐私作为促进因素,而非障碍:在健康信息交换中建立信任。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):416-27. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.416.
9
Creation of clinical research databases in the 21st century: a practical algorithm for HIPAA Compliance.21世纪临床研究数据库的创建:符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》的实用算法
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006 Feb;7(1):37-44. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.7.37.
10
HIPAA hurdles. New rules pose complex challenges for providers.《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)的障碍。新规定给医疗服务提供者带来了复杂的挑战。
Mod Healthc. 2013 Sep 23;43(38):32-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Pseudonymisation of neuroimages and data protection: .神经影像的假名化与数据保护:
Neuroimage Rep. 2021 Sep 15;1(4):100053. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100053. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Harnessing artificial intelligence in sepsis care: advances in early detection, personalized treatment, and real-time monitoring.脓毒症护理中人工智能的应用:早期检测、个性化治疗和实时监测的进展
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 6;11:1510792. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1510792. eCollection 2024.
3
Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology: The Co-pilot or the Captain?人工智能在胃肠病学中的伦理问题:副驾还是机长?
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Aug;69(8):2727-2733. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08557-9. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
4
Learning from vertically distributed data across multiple sites: An efficient privacy-preserving algorithm for Cox proportional hazards model with variable selection.从多个站点的垂直分布数据中学习:一种用于具有变量选择的Cox比例风险模型的高效隐私保护算法。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Jan;149:104581. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104581. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
5
Geographic Disparities in Re-triage Destinations Among Seriously Injured Californians.加利福尼亚重伤患者再分诊目的地的地域差异
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Mar;4(1). doi: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000270. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
6
Algorithms to anonymize structured medical and healthcare data: A systematic review.使结构化医学和医疗保健数据匿名化的算法:一项系统综述。
Front Bioinform. 2022 Dec 22;2:984807. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.984807. eCollection 2022.
7
A Multifaceted benchmarking of synthetic electronic health record generation models.综合电子健康记录生成模型的多方面基准测试。
Nat Commun. 2022 Dec 9;13(1):7609. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35295-1.
8
Twenty Years of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Safe Harbor Provision: Unsolved Challenges and Ways Forward.《医疗保险可携性与责任法案》安全港条款二十年:未解挑战与前行之路
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Aug 3;10(8):e37756. doi: 10.2196/37756.
9
Privacy Protection and Secondary Use of Health Data: Strategies and Methods.隐私保护与健康数据的二次利用:策略与方法。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Oct 7;2021:6967166. doi: 10.1155/2021/6967166. eCollection 2021.
10
Differential privacy in health research: A scoping review.健康研究中的差分隐私:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2269-2276. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab135.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond Safe Harbor: Automatic Discovery of Health Information De-identification Policy Alternatives.超越安全港:自动发现健康信息去识别化政策替代方案。
IHI. 2010;2010:163-172. doi: 10.1145/1882992.1883017.
2
Evaluating re-identification risks with respect to the HIPAA privacy rule.评估 HIPAA 隐私规则下的重新识别风险。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):169-77. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000026.
3
Genomic privacy and limits of individual detection in a pool.基因组隐私与混合样本中个体检测的局限性
Nat Genet. 2009 Sep;41(9):965-7. doi: 10.1038/ng.436. Epub 2009 Aug 23.
4
A globally optimal k-anonymity method for the de-identification of health data.一种用于健康数据去标识化的全局最优 k-匿名方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):670-82. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3144. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
5
Reforming the HIPAA Privacy Rule: safeguarding privacy and promoting research.改革《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则:保护隐私并促进研究。
JAMA. 2009 Apr 1;301(13):1373-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.424.
6
Collaborative genome-wide association studies of diverse diseases: programs of the NHGRI's office of population genomics.多种疾病的全基因组关联研究合作:美国国立人类基因组研究所群体基因组学办公室的项目
Pharmacogenomics. 2009 Feb;10(2):235-41. doi: 10.2217/14622416.10.2.235.
7
Protecting privacy using k-anonymity.使用 k-匿名保护隐私。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):627-37. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2716. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
8
Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine.开发一个大规模的去识别化DNA生物样本库以实现个性化医疗。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep;84(3):362-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.89. Epub 2008 May 21.
9
Remote access methods for exploratory data analysis and statistical modelling: Privacy-Preserving Analytics.用于探索性数据分析和统计建模的远程访问方法:隐私保护分析
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008 Sep;91(3):208-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 May 20.
10
Influence of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on health research.《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则对健康研究的影响。
JAMA. 2007 Nov 14;298(18):2164-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.18.2164.

永远不要因为年龄而放弃匿名:通过 HIPAA 隐私规则共享人口统计数据的统计标准。

Never too old for anonymity: a statistical standard for demographic data sharing via the HIPAA Privacy Rule.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):3-10. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004622.

DOI:10.1136/jamia.2010.004622
PMID:21169618
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3005867/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Healthcare organizations must de-identify patient records before sharing data. Many organizations rely on the Safe Harbor Standard of the HIPAA Privacy Rule, which enumerates 18 identifiers that must be suppressed (eg, ages over 89). An alternative model in the Privacy Rule, known as the Statistical Standard, can facilitate the sharing of more detailed data, but is rarely applied because of a lack of published methodologies. The authors propose an intuitive approach to de-identifying patient demographics in accordance with the Statistical Standard.

DESIGN

The authors conduct an analysis of the demographics of patient cohorts in five medical centers developed for the NIH-sponsored Electronic Medical Records and Genomics network, with respect to the US census. They report the re-identification risk of patient demographics disclosed according to the Safe Harbor policy and the relative risk rate for sharing such information via alternative policies.

MEASUREMENTS

The re-identification risk of Safe Harbor demographics ranged from 0.01% to 0.19%. The findings show alternative de-identification models can be created with risks no greater than Safe Harbor. The authors illustrate that the disclosure of patient ages over the age of 89 is possible when other features are reduced in granularity.

LIMITATIONS

The de-identification approach described in this paper was evaluated with demographic data only and should be evaluated with other potential identifiers.

CONCLUSION

Alternative de-identification policies to the Safe Harbor model can be derived for patient demographics to enable the disclosure of values that were previously suppressed. The method is generalizable to any environment in which population statistics are available.

摘要

目的

医疗保健组织在共享数据之前必须对患者记录进行去识别。许多组织依赖 HIPAA 隐私规则的安全港标准,该标准列举了必须抑制的 18 个标识符(例如,年龄超过 89 岁)。隐私规则中的替代模型,称为统计标准,可以促进更详细数据的共享,但由于缺乏已发布的方法,很少应用。作者提出了一种符合统计标准的直观方法来对患者人口统计学信息进行去识别。

设计

作者对五个医疗中心的 NIH 赞助的电子病历和基因组网络开发的患者队列的人口统计学进行了分析,涉及到美国人口普查。他们报告了根据安全港政策披露患者人口统计学信息的重新识别风险,以及通过替代政策共享此类信息的相对风险率。

测量

安全港人口统计学的重新识别风险从 0.01%到 0.19%不等。研究结果表明,可以创建风险不高于安全港的替代去识别模型。作者说明,当其他特征的粒度降低时,可以披露年龄超过 89 岁的患者的年龄。

局限性

本文描述的去识别方法仅使用人口统计学数据进行了评估,应使用其他潜在标识符进行评估。

结论

可以为患者人口统计学信息制定替代安全港模型的去识别策略,以披露以前被抑制的值。该方法适用于任何可以获得人口统计数据的环境。