Department of Anesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Can J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;58(2):149-56. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9421-2. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
To review the mechanisms of sedative-hypnotic action with respect to the risk of delirium imparted by drugs that act on γ-amino-butyric-acid type A receptors or α(2) adrenoceptors.
MEDLINE was searched for relevant articles.
Development of the acute confusional state of delirium is associated with longer intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, significantly higher risk of functional decline, and increased mortality. Disruption of sleep is a modifiable risk factor that may contribute to delirium and cognitive dysfunction in ICU patients. Among the functions of sleep are repair of defective processes and restoration of the brain to a state in which it is ready to acquire new knowledge. It is logical that disruption of these processes may produce acute confusion. Delirium develops through a complex interaction between the patient's baseline vulnerability (patient's predisposing risk factors before hospitalization) and precipitating factors or insults (modifiable events that occur during hospitalization). The latter factors include both sleep disruption and sedation. We present a hypothesis that these two factors are causally linked through effects on memory. Our hypothesis explains why patients randomized to receive an α(2) adrenoceptor agonist are less likely to develop delirium (and the attendant cognitive dysfunction) than those randomized to receive benzodiazepines.
Herein we present our hypothesis that alternate mechanisms of hypnotic action may differentiate the deleriogenic properties of the two classes of sedatives. Future studies should focus on whether a causal relationship can be established between sedative administration, sleep disruption, and delirium.
综述作用于γ-氨基丁酸 A 型受体或 α2 肾上腺素能受体的药物致谵妄风险的镇静催眠作用机制。
检索 MEDLINE 相关文章。
急性意识混乱状态(谵妄)的发生与 ICU 和住院时间延长、功能下降风险显著增加以及死亡率增加有关。睡眠中断是一个可改变的危险因素,可能导致 ICU 患者出现谵妄和认知功能障碍。睡眠的功能之一是修复有缺陷的过程,并使大脑恢复到准备获取新知识的状态。这些过程的中断可能导致急性意识混乱,这是合乎逻辑的。谵妄是通过患者的基线脆弱性(住院前患者的易患风险因素)和促发因素或损伤(住院期间发生的可改变的事件)之间的复杂相互作用而发展的。后者包括睡眠中断和镇静。我们提出了一个假设,即这两个因素通过对记忆的影响存在因果关系。我们的假设解释了为什么接受 α2 肾上腺素能激动剂治疗的患者比接受苯二氮䓬类药物治疗的患者发生谵妄(和随之而来的认知功能障碍)的可能性更小。
本文提出了一个假设,即催眠作用的替代机制可能区分这两类镇静剂的致谵妄特性。未来的研究应集中于是否可以在镇静剂给药、睡眠中断和谵妄之间建立因果关系。