• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Scratching the structure of moral agency: insights from philosophy applied to neuroscience.剖析道德行为主体的结构:哲学应用于神经科学的见解
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jul 19;17:1198001. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1198001. eCollection 2023.
2
Towards an interdisciplinary "science of the mind": A call for enhanced collaboration between philosophy and neuroscience.迈向跨学科的“心灵科学”:呼吁哲学和神经科学加强合作。
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Sep;60(5):4771-4784. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16451. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3
An empirical perspective on moral expertise: Evidence from a global study of philosophers.从全球哲学家研究看道德专长的经验视角
Bioethics. 2022 Nov;36(9):926-935. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13079. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism.意识恢复了?支持和反对还原物理主义的哲学论证。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Mar;14(1):55-63. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.1/tsturm.
5
Moral philosophy and public policy: the case of NRTs.道德哲学与公共政策:以戒烟辅助药物为例。
Bioethics. 1993 Jan;7(1):1-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00268.x.
6
Consciousness, philosophy, and neuroscience.意识、哲学与神经科学。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):833-839. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05179-w. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
7
Will neuroscience explain consciousness?神经科学能解释意识吗?
J Theor Biol. 1994 Nov 7;171(1):29-39. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1209.
8
[Neurons and values].[神经元与价值观]
Rev Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;57(5):230-4.
9
Addiction and its sciences-philosophy.成瘾及其科学-哲学。
Addiction. 2011 Jan;106(1):25-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03158.x. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
10
Refining moral agency: Insights from moral psychology and moral philosophy.完善道德能动性:来自道德心理学与道德哲学的见解
Nurs Philos. 2018 Jan;19(1). doi: 10.1111/nup.12185. Epub 2017 Aug 11.

本文引用的文献

1
From Neuroscience to Law: Bridging the Gap.从神经科学到法律:弥合差距。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 22;11:1862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01862. eCollection 2020.
2
Simultaneous EEG-fMRI for Functional Neurological Assessment.同步脑电图-功能磁共振成像用于功能性神经评估。
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 13;10:848. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00848. eCollection 2019.
3
Neuroscience and mental state issues in forensic assessment.法医学鉴定中的神经科学与精神状态问题。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Jul-Aug;65:101437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
4
Neuroscience nuance: dissecting the relevance of neuroscience in adjudicating criminal culpability.神经科学的细微差别:剖析神经科学在判定刑事罪责中的相关性。
J Law Biosci. 2017 Nov 11;4(3):577-593. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsx033. eCollection 2017 Dec.
5
Neural Correlates of Unconsciousness in Large-Scale Brain Networks.大规模脑网络中无意识的神经相关物。
Trends Neurosci. 2018 Mar;41(3):150-160. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
6
On the Science of Consciousness: Epistemological Reflections and Clinical Implications.论意识科学:认识论反思与临床意义
Explore (NY). 2017 May-Jun;13(3):163-180. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
7
What does recent neuroscience tell us about criminal responsibility?近期神经科学能就刑事责任告诉我们什么?
J Law Biosci. 2015 Dec 30;3(1):120-139. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv051. eCollection 2016 Apr.
8
Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems.意识的神经相关:进展与问题。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 May;17(5):307-21. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.22.
9
The point of no return in vetoing self-initiated movements.否决自发运动的不可逆转点。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 26;113(4):1080-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513569112. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
10
The impact of neuroscience on society: cognitive enhancement in neuropsychiatric disorders and in healthy people.神经科学对社会的影响:神经精神疾病及健康人群中的认知增强
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 19;370(1677):20140214. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0214.

剖析道德行为主体的结构:哲学应用于神经科学的见解

Scratching the structure of moral agency: insights from philosophy applied to neuroscience.

作者信息

Castro-Toledo Francisco Javier, Cerezo Pablo, Gómez-Bellvís Ana Belén

机构信息

Plus Ethics, Elche, Spain.

Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2023 Jul 19;17:1198001. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1198001. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fnins.2023.1198001
PMID:37539381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10396301/
Abstract

This paper explores the intersection between neuroscience and philosophy, particularly in the areas of moral philosophy and philosophy of mind. While traditional philosophical questions, such as those relating to free will and moral motivation, have been subject to much debate, the rise of neuroscience has led to a reinterpretation of these questions considering empirical evidence. This has led to tensions between those who believe neuroscience can provide definitive answers to very complex philosophical questions and those who are skeptical about the scope of these studies. However, the paper argues that neuroscientists and philosophers can work together to generate major scientific and social advances. To contribute to bridge the gap, in this paper we expose the complexity of moral experience from a philosophical point of view and point to two great challenges and gaps to cover from neurosciences.

摘要

本文探讨神经科学与哲学的交叉领域,特别是在道德哲学和心灵哲学方面。虽然诸如与自由意志和道德动机相关的传统哲学问题一直备受争议,但神经科学的兴起促使人们根据经验证据对这些问题进行重新诠释。这导致了两派之间的紧张关系,一派认为神经科学能够为非常复杂的哲学问题提供明确答案,另一派则对这些研究的范围持怀疑态度。然而,本文认为神经科学家和哲学家可以共同努力,取得重大的科学和社会进步。为了有助于弥合差距,在本文中,我们从哲学角度揭示了道德体验的复杂性,并指出了神经科学需要应对的两大挑战和差距。