Suppr超能文献

长期氧疗中脉搏血氧饱和度测定与动脉血气标本的比较

Pulse oximetry versus arterial blood gas specimens in long-term oxygen therapy.

作者信息

Pierson D J

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

Lung. 1990;168 Suppl:782-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02718208.

Abstract

Portable pulse oximeters are now widely available for the assessment of arterial oxygenation, and the U.S. Medicare program considers saturation readings to be acceptable substitutes for arterial PO2 in selecting patients for long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT). Current oximeters are reasonably accurate (plus or minus 4 or 5 percent of the co-oximetry value), but the clinician should be aware of several potential problems. Readings may be inaccurate in the presence of hemodynamic instability, carboxyhemoglobinemia, jaundice, or dark skin pigmentation, and also during exercise. Indicated saturation may substantially overestimate arterial PO2 if the patient is alkalemic. Pulse oximetry cannot detect hypercapnia or acidosis. For these and other reasons, pulse oximetry should not be used in initial selection of patients for LTOT, as a substitute for arterial blood gas analysis in the evaluation of patients with undiagnosed respiratory disease, during formal cardiopulmonary exercise testing, or in the presence of an acute exacerbation. Pulse oximetry is an important addition to the clinician's armamentarium, however, for titrating the oxygen dose in stable patients, in assessing patients for desaturation during exercise, for sleep studies, and for in-home monitoring.

摘要

便携式脉搏血氧仪现已广泛用于评估动脉氧合情况,美国医疗保险计划认为在为患者选择长期氧疗(LTOT)时,血氧饱和度读数可作为动脉血氧分压的可接受替代指标。目前的血氧仪相当准确(与血气共测定值相差正负4%或5%),但临床医生应意识到几个潜在问题。在存在血流动力学不稳定、碳氧血红蛋白血症、黄疸或皮肤色素沉着较深的情况下,以及在运动期间,读数可能不准确。如果患者存在碱血症,所显示的饱和度可能会大幅高估动脉血氧分压。脉搏血氧仪无法检测高碳酸血症或酸中毒。出于这些及其他原因,在LTOT患者的初始选择、评估未确诊呼吸系统疾病患者时替代动脉血气分析、正式心肺运动试验期间或急性加重期,不应使用脉搏血氧仪。然而,对于稳定患者的氧剂量滴定、评估运动期间患者的血氧饱和度下降情况、睡眠研究以及家庭监测,脉搏血氧仪是临床医生的重要工具补充。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验