Laboratório de Educação em Ambiente e Saúde, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2011 Feb;45(1):145-52. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102011000100017.
To identify combinations of two models of psychosocial stress at work among nursing teams and their associations with self-rated health.
This was a cross-sectional study among workers at three public hospitals in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil (N = 1307). In 2006, a multidimensional questionnaire including two scales for measuring stress at work (demand-control and effort-reward imbalance models) was administered. Partial and complete (including social support at work) demand-control models were considered, along with partial and complete (including excessive commitment to work) effort-reward models. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and their respective 95% confidence intervals.
The dimensions of both models were independently associated with self-rated health, with odds ratios between 1.70 and 3.37. The partial demand-control model was less associated with health (OR = 1.79; 95%CI 1.26;2.53) than was the partial effort-reward imbalance model (OR = 2.27; 95%CI 1.57;3.30). Incorporation of social support and excessive commitment to work increased the strength of the demand-control and effort-reward imbalance models, respectively. Increased strength of association was observed when the two partial models were combined.
The results indicate that the effort-reward imbalance model performed better for this specific group and for the outcome evaluated, and that there was an advantage in using complete models or combinations of partial models.
确定护理团队工作中的两种心理社会压力模型的组合及其与自我评估健康状况的关联。
这是巴西东南部里约热内卢市三所公立医院工作人员的横断面研究(N=1307)。2006 年,对工作人员进行了多维问卷调查,包括两种工作压力测量量表(需求-控制和努力-回报失衡模型)。考虑了部分和完整(包括工作中的社会支持)需求-控制模型,以及部分和完整(包括对工作的过度承诺)努力-回报模型。使用多因素逻辑回归模型来估计调整后的比值比及其相应的 95%置信区间。
两个模型的维度都与自我评估的健康状况独立相关,比值比在 1.70 到 3.37 之间。部分需求-控制模型与健康的关联程度较低(OR=1.79;95%CI 1.26;2.53),而部分努力-回报失衡模型的关联程度较高(OR=2.27;95%CI 1.57;3.30)。纳入社会支持和对工作的过度承诺分别增加了需求-控制和努力-回报失衡模型的强度。当组合两个部分模型时,观察到关联强度增加。
结果表明,对于特定群体和评估结果,努力-回报失衡模型的表现更好,并且使用完整模型或部分模型的组合具有优势。