• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较快速进化和快速诱导防御对捕食者-猎物相互作用产生的定性不同的影响。

Comparing the qualitatively different effects rapidly evolving and rapidly induced defences have on predator-prey interactions.

机构信息

Center for Applied Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Lett. 2011 Feb;14(2):202-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01572.x. Epub 2010 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01572.x
PMID:21199249
Abstract

Interspecific interactions depend not only on the population densities of the interacting species, but on their phenotypes as well. Phenotypic variation can be plastic or heritable and both mechanisms can drive phenotypic change at rates comparable to or faster than those of ecological dynamics (e.g. changes in population abundances or spatial distributions). In this study, we compare the effects rapidly induced and rapidly evolving defences have on community dynamics by considering the fast phenotypic change limit using fast-slow systems theory. Our approach allows us to study phenotypically plastic and evolving systems with one overarching theory, thus capturing the effects rapidly induced defences have on ecological dynamics and how those effects differ from the effects of evolving defences. Our results show that rapidly induced defences tend to stabilize community dynamics and that some behaviours observed in rapidly evolving systems cannot be produced by phenotypic plasticity.

摘要

种间相互作用不仅取决于相互作用的物种的种群密度,还取决于它们的表型。表型变异可以是可塑性的,也可以是遗传性的,这两种机制都可以以与生态动态(例如种群丰度或空间分布的变化)相当或更快的速度驱动表型变化。在这项研究中,我们通过使用快速-慢速系统理论考虑快速表型变化极限,比较了快速诱导和快速进化防御对群落动态的影响。我们的方法允许我们使用一个总体理论来研究表型可塑性和进化系统,从而捕捉快速诱导防御对生态动态的影响,以及这些影响与进化防御的影响有何不同。我们的研究结果表明,快速诱导防御往往会稳定群落动态,而在快速进化系统中观察到的一些行为不能由表型可塑性产生。

相似文献

1
Comparing the qualitatively different effects rapidly evolving and rapidly induced defences have on predator-prey interactions.比较快速进化和快速诱导防御对捕食者-猎物相互作用产生的定性不同的影响。
Ecol Lett. 2011 Feb;14(2):202-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01572.x. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
2
Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity can lead to stable predator-prey interaction.互惠表型可塑性可导致稳定的捕食者-猎物相互作用。
J Anim Ecol. 2009 Nov;78(6):1172-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01600.x. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
3
Understanding rapid evolution in predator‐prey interactions using the theory of fast‐slow dynamical systems.利用快速-缓慢动力系统理论理解捕食者-猎物相互作用中的快速进化。
Am Nat. 2010 Nov;176(5):E109-27. doi: 10.1086/656485.
4
Comparing the effects of rapid evolution and phenotypic plasticity on predator-prey dynamics.比较快速进化和表型可塑性对捕食者-猎物动态的影响。
Am Nat. 2011 Sep;178(3):287-304. doi: 10.1086/661241.
5
Unusual predator-prey dynamics under reciprocal phenotypic plasticity.互惠表型可塑性下不寻常的捕食者-猎物动态。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Jul 21;305:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.04.012. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
6
Habitat choice in predator-prey systems: spatial instability due to interacting adaptive movements.捕食者 - 猎物系统中的栖息地选择:由于相互作用的适应性运动导致的空间不稳定性。
Am Nat. 2007 May;169(5):581-94. doi: 10.1086/512688. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
7
Coevolution of phenotypic plasticity in predator and prey: why are inducible offenses rarer than inducible defenses?捕食者和猎物表型可塑性的共同进化:为什么诱导性进攻比诱导性防御罕见?
Evolution. 2011 Apr;65(4):1079-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01187.x. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
8
Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice.饮食选择的动态模型与即时模型
Am Nat. 2003 Nov;162(5):668-84. doi: 10.1086/378783. Epub 2003 Nov 6.
9
Fluctuating population dynamics promotes the evolution of phenotypic plasticity.波动的种群动态促进了表型可塑性的进化。
Am Nat. 2009 Aug;174(2):176-89. doi: 10.1086/600112.
10
Adaptive dynamics of Lotka-Volterra systems with trade-offs: the role of interspecific parameter dependence in branching.具有权衡的Lotka-Volterra系统的适应性动力学:种间参数依赖性在分支中的作用。
Math Biosci. 2005 Jan;193(1):101-17. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2004.10.006. Epub 2005 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The double-edged sword of inducible defences: costs and benefits of maladaptive switching from the individual to the community level.诱导防御的双刃剑:从个体水平到社区水平的适应不良转变的成本和收益。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 20;12(1):10344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13895-7.
2
How does genetic architecture affect eco-evolutionary dynamics? A theoretical perspective.遗传结构如何影响生态进化动态?理论视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Jul 18;377(1855):20200504. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0504. Epub 2022 May 30.
3
Rethinking trophic niches: Speed and body mass colimit prey space of mammalian predators.
重新审视营养生态位:速度和体重共同限制了哺乳动物捕食者的猎物空间。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jun 28;10(14):7094-7105. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6411. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
Reversed predator-prey cycles are driven by the amplitude of prey oscillations.反向的捕食者-猎物循环由猎物振荡的幅度驱动。
Ecol Evol. 2018 May 24;8(12):6317-6329. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4184. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
Disentangling eco-evolutionary dynamics of predator-prey coevolution: the case of antiphase cycles.解析捕食者-猎物协同进化的生态进化动态:相反周期的案例。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 7;7(1):17125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17019-4.
6
Changes in predator exposure, but not in diet, induce phenotypic plasticity in scorpion venom.捕食者暴露情况的变化而非饮食的变化,会诱导蝎子毒液产生表型可塑性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 27;284(1863). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1364.
7
Energetics and evasion dynamics of large predators and prey: pumas hounds.大型食肉动物与猎物的能量学及躲避动态:美洲狮与猎犬
PeerJ. 2017 Aug 17;5:e3701. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3701. eCollection 2017.
8
Expanded view of ecosystem stability: A grazed grassland case study.生态系统稳定性的扩展视角:一个放牧草原的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 7;12(6):e0178235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178235. eCollection 2017.
9
Trait adaptation promotes species coexistence in diverse predator and prey communities.性状适应促进了不同捕食者和猎物群落中的物种共存。
Ecol Evol. 2016 May 23;6(12):4141-59. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2172. eCollection 2016 Jun.
10
Maternal effects on offspring consumption can stabilize fluctuating predator-prey systems.母体对后代摄食的影响能够稳定波动的捕食者-猎物系统。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 7;282(1820):20152173. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2173.