Institute of Neuroscience, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 29;5(12):e15638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015638.
How do we estimate time when watching an action? The idea that events are timed by a centralized clock has recently been called into question in favour of distributed, specialized mechanisms. Here we provide evidence for a critical specialization: animate and inanimate events are separately timed by humans.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In different experiments, observers were asked to intercept a moving target or to discriminate the duration of a stationary flash while viewing different scenes. Time estimates were systematically shorter in the sessions involving human characters moving in the scene than in those involving inanimate moving characters. Remarkably, the animate/inanimate context also affected randomly intermingled trials which always depicted the same still character.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The existence of distinct time bases for animate and inanimate events might be related to the partial segregation of the neural networks processing these two categories of objects, and could enhance our ability to predict critically timed actions.
当我们观看一个动作时,我们如何估计时间?最近,人们对事件由集中时钟计时的观点提出了质疑,转而支持分布式、专业化的机制。在这里,我们提供了一个关键专业化的证据:人类可以分别对有生命和无生命的事件进行计时。
方法/主要发现:在不同的实验中,要求观察者在观看不同场景时拦截移动目标或辨别固定闪光的持续时间。在涉及场景中移动的人类角色的会话中,时间估计比涉及无生命移动角色的会话要短。值得注意的是,有生命/无生命的上下文也影响了随机混合的试验,这些试验总是描绘同一个静止的角色。
结论/意义:有生命和无生命事件的不同时间基础的存在可能与处理这两类物体的神经网络的部分分离有关,并可能增强我们预测关键定时动作的能力。