• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对二年级医学生的团队学习与小组学习的试验:小组的规模是否有影响?

A trial of team-based versus small-group learning for second-year medical students: does the size of the small group make a difference?

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2011 Jan;23(1):28-30. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2011.536756.

DOI:10.1080/10401334.2011.536756
PMID:21240779
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Team-based learning is a large-group instructional modality intended to provide active learning with modest faculty resources.

PURPOSE

The goal is to determine if team-based learning could be substituted for small-group learning in case sessions without compromising test performance or satisfaction.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-seven students were assigned to team-based or small-group learning for 6 case discussion sessions. Examination scores and student satisfaction were compared.

RESULTS

Instruction modality had no meaningful effect on examination score, 81.7% team based versus 79.7% small-group, p=.56 after multivariate adjustment. Student satisfaction was lower with team-based learning, 2.45 versus 3.74 on a 5-point scale, p<.001. Survey responses suggested that the very small size (8-10 students) of our small groups influenced the preference for small-group learning.

CONCLUSIONS

Team-based learning does not adversely affect examination performance. However, student satisfaction may be inferior, especially if compared to instruction in very small groups of 10 or fewer students.

摘要

背景

团队学习是一种大群体教学模式,旨在提供适度的教师资源的主动学习。

目的

目标是确定团队学习是否可以替代案例讨论课程中的小组学习,而不会影响考试成绩或满意度。

方法

167 名学生被分配到团队学习或小组学习进行 6 次案例讨论。比较考试成绩和学生满意度。

结果

教学模式对考试成绩没有明显影响,团队学习为 81.7%,小组学习为 79.7%,p=.56 经多变量调整后。学生对团队学习的满意度较低,为 2.45 对 5 分制的 3.74,p<.001。调查结果表明,我们小组学习的规模非常小(8-10 名学生)影响了对小组学习的偏好。

结论

团队学习不会对考试成绩产生不利影响。然而,学生的满意度可能较低,尤其是与 10 名或更少学生的非常小组教学相比。

相似文献

1
A trial of team-based versus small-group learning for second-year medical students: does the size of the small group make a difference?一项针对二年级医学生的团队学习与小组学习的试验:小组的规模是否有影响?
Teach Learn Med. 2011 Jan;23(1):28-30. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2011.536756.
2
A controlled trial of team-based learning in an ambulatory medicine clerkship for medical students.一项针对医学生在门诊医学实习中基于团队的学习的对照试验。
Teach Learn Med. 2011 Jan;23(1):31-6. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2011.536888.
3
Student faculty rounds: a peer-mediated learning activity for internal medicine clerkships.学生-教员查房:内科实习的同伴介导学习活动
Med Teach. 2005 Mar;27(2):140-4. doi: 10.1080/01421590500047047.
4
Team-based learning: a relevant strategy in health professionals' education.团队学习:一种在卫生专业人员教育中相关的策略。
Med Teach. 2012;34(5):411-3. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.643267. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
5
Small group learning in medical education: a second look at the Springer, Stanne, and Donovan meta-analysis.医学教育中的小组学习:对施普林格、斯坦内和多诺万元分析的再审视
Teach Learn Med. 2003 Winter;15(1):2-5. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1501_01.
6
A prospective study of medical students' perspective of teaching-learning media: reiterating the importance of feedback.医学生对教学媒体看法的前瞻性研究:重申反馈的重要性
J Indian Med Assoc. 2007 Nov;105(11):621-3, 636.
7
A comparison of in-class learner engagement across lecture, problem-based learning, and team learning using the STROBE classroom observation tool.使用STROBE课堂观察工具对讲座式教学、基于问题的学习和小组学习中课堂学习者参与度的比较。
Teach Learn Med. 2005 Spring;17(2):112-8. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_4.
8
Simulation-based teaching to improve cardiovascular exam skills performance among third-year medical students.基于模拟的教学提高了医学生在心血管检查技能方面的表现。
Teach Learn Med. 2011 Jan;23(1):15-20. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2011.536753.
9
Trainees as teachers in team-based learning.学员作为团队学习中的教师。
Acad Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;34(4):294-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.34.4.294.
10
Factors determining medical students' and residents' satisfaction during VA-based training: findings from the VA Learners' Perceptions Survey.决定医学生和住院医师在退伍军人事务部(VA)培训期间满意度的因素:VA学习者认知调查的结果
Acad Med. 2008 Jun;83(6):611-20. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181722e97.

引用本文的文献

1
In-Person or Online? The Effect of Delivery Mode on Team-Based Learning of Clinical Reasoning in a Family Medicine Clerkship.面授或在线?教学模式对家庭医学实习中基于团队的临床推理学习的影响。
Med Sci (Basel). 2022 Aug 8;10(3):41. doi: 10.3390/medsci10030041.
2
Choosing Wisely in Pre-clinical Medical Education: a Direct Comparison of Active Learning Methods for Teaching Metabolic Liver Disease.临床前医学教育中的明智选择:代谢性肝病教学中主动学习方法的直接比较。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Oct 28;30(1):139-146. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00821-2. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Classroom Response System in a Super-Blended Learning and Teaching Model: Individual or Team-Based Learning?
超混合学习与教学模式中的课堂反馈系统:个人学习还是基于团队的学习?
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Oct 24;8(4):197. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8040197.
4
Analysis of the Team-Based Learning Literature: TBL Comes of Age.基于团队学习的文献分析:基于团队的学习走向成熟。
J Excell Coll Teach. 2014;25(3-4):303-333.
5
Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study.对三名、五名和八名医学生组成的小组有效开展基础生命支持教学:一项前瞻性随机研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 6;14:185. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-185.
6
Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review.将既定准则应用于医学院的团队学习计划:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2014 Apr;89(4):678-88. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000162.
7
Team-based learning in pharmacy education.团队学习在药学教育中的应用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):70. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77470.