Sweetow Robert W, Sabes Jennifer Henderson
Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Oct;21(9):586-93. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.9.4.
When individuals have hearing loss, physiological changes in their brain interact with relearning of sound patterns. Some individuals utilize compensatory strategies that may result in successful hearing aid use. Others, however, are not so fortunate. Modern hearing aids can provide audibility but may not rectify spectral and temporal resolution, susceptibility to noise interference, or degradation of cognitive skills, such as declining auditory memory and slower speed of processing associated with aging. Frequently, these deficits are not identified during a typical "hearing aid evaluation." Aural rehabilitation has long been advocated to enhance communication but has not been considered time or cost-effective. Home-based, interactive adaptive computer therapy programs are available that are designed to engage the adult hearing-impaired listener in the hearing aid fitting process, provide listening strategies, build confidence, and address cognitive changes. Despite the availability of these programs, many patients and professionals are reluctant to engage in and complete therapy.
The purposes of this article are to discuss the need for identifying auditory and nonauditory factors that may adversely affect the overall audiological rehabilitation process, to discuss important features that should be incorporated into training, and to examine reasons for the lack of compliance with therapeutic options. Possible solutions to maximizing compliance are explored.
Only a small portion of audiologists (fewer than 10%) offer auditory training to patients with hearing impairment, even though auditory training appears to lower the rate of hearing aid returns for credit. Patients to whom auditory training programs are recommended often do not complete the training, however. Compliance for a cohort of home-based auditory therapy trainees was less than 30%. Activities to increase patient compliance to auditory training protocols are proposed.
当个体出现听力损失时,其大脑中的生理变化会与声音模式的重新学习相互作用。一些个体采用补偿策略,这可能会带来助听器使用的成功。然而,另一些人则没那么幸运。现代助听器可以提供可听度,但可能无法纠正频谱和时间分辨率、对噪声干扰的敏感性或认知技能的退化,比如与衰老相关的听觉记忆下降和处理速度减慢。通常,这些缺陷在典型的“助听器评估”过程中并未被识别出来。长期以来,一直提倡听觉康复以增强沟通能力,但一直未被认为具有时间或成本效益。现在有基于家庭的交互式自适应计算机治疗程序,旨在让成年听力受损者参与助听器适配过程,提供听力策略,建立信心,并解决认知变化问题。尽管有这些程序,但许多患者和专业人员都不愿意参与并完成治疗。
本文的目的是讨论识别可能对整体听力学康复过程产生不利影响的听觉和非听觉因素的必要性,讨论应纳入训练的重要特征,并研究不遵守治疗方案的原因。探索了使依从性最大化的可能解决方案。
尽管听觉训练似乎能降低助听器退货率,但只有一小部分听力学家(不到10%)为听力受损患者提供听觉训练。然而,被推荐参加听觉训练项目的患者往往没有完成训练。一组基于家庭的听觉治疗学员的依从率不到30%。本文提出了提高患者对听觉训练方案依从性的活动。