• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规白内障手术中的自动角膜曲率计:Scheimpflug 与常规值的比较。

Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values.

机构信息

Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Feb;37(2):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.050.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.050
PMID:21241912
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the mean keratometry (K) readings obtained with a conventional automated keratometer (IOLMaster) and a Scheimpflug keratometer (Pentacam) in eyes having preoperative assessment for routine cataract surgery.

SETTING

Epsom and St. Helier University Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Evaluation of diagnostic technology.

METHODS

Mean K values were obtained with the conventional and Scheimpflug keratometers. The following Scheimpflug readings were evaluated: anterior K, true net power, and Holladay equivalent K measured at 1.0 to 7.0 mm corneal diameters. Mean readings for each type of keratometry were compared. Bland-Altman plots were used to determine the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for the conventional and Scheimpflug keratometers.

RESULTS

The mean conventional K was statistically significantly greater than the mean Scheimpflug K for true net power and equivalent K at 1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, and 4.0 mm corneal diameters. The mean conventional K was significantly less than the equivalent K at 5.0 mm, 6.0 mm, and 7.0 mm. The smallest mean difference was for equivalent K at 4.5 mm (0.02 diopters [D]). The smallest 95% LoA were -0.68 to 1.16 D (equivalent K at 5.0 mm) and -0.91 to 0.95 D (equivalent K at 4.5 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the equivalent K at 4.5 mm had the closest match with the conventional K values. The degree of interdevice variability with the conventional keratometer was lowest for the equivalent K at 4.5 mm and 5.0 mm, although this variability would be sufficient to influence intraocular lens power selection.

摘要

目的

比较常规自动角膜曲率计(IOLMaster)和Scheimpflug 角膜地形图仪(Pentacam)在接受常规白内障术前评估的眼中测量的平均角膜曲率(K)读数。

设置

英国伦敦埃普索姆和圣赫利尔大学医院。

设计

诊断技术评估。

方法

使用常规和 Scheimpflug 角膜曲率计获得平均 K 值。评估以下 Scheimpflug 读数:前 K 值、真实净力和 1.0 至 7.0 mm 角膜直径处的 Holladay 等效 K 值。比较每种角膜曲率计的平均读数。Bland-Altman 图用于确定常规和 Scheimpflug 角膜曲率计的 95%一致性界限(LoA)。

结果

在 1.0 mm、2.0 mm、3.0 mm 和 4.0 mm 角膜直径处,常规 K 的平均值显著大于 Scheimpflug K 的平均值,用于真实净力和等效 K。在 5.0 mm、6.0 mm 和 7.0 mm 处,常规 K 的平均值显著小于等效 K。等效 K 在 4.5 mm 处的平均差异最小(0.02 屈光度 [D])。最小的 95%LoA 为 -0.68 至 1.16 D(等效 K 在 5.0 mm)和 -0.91 至 0.95 D(等效 K 在 4.5 mm)。

结论

总体而言,等效 K 在 4.5 mm 处与常规 K 值最匹配。常规角膜曲率计的设备间变异性最小,等效 K 在 4.5 mm 和 5.0 mm 处,尽管这种变异性足以影响人工晶状体功率选择。

相似文献

1
Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values.常规白内障手术中的自动角膜曲率计:Scheimpflug 与常规值的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Feb;37(2):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.050.
2
Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation.用于常规人工晶状体屈光力计算的Scheimpflug摄影角膜曲率测量读数。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Feb;35(2):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.041.
3
Scheimpflug keratometry versus conventional automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jul;36(7):1107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.026.
4
Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery.角膜屈光手术后Scheimpflug Holladay等效角膜曲率计读数的准确性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jul;35(7):1198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.030.
5
A comparison of Scheimpflug imaging simulated and Holladay equivalent keratometry values with partial coherence interferometry keratometry measurements in phakic eyes.在有晶状体眼中,比较Scheimpflug 成像模拟值和 Holladay 等效角膜曲率值与部分相干干涉仪角膜曲率测量值。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;44(6):700-4. doi: 10.3129/i09-172.
6
Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies.不同测量技术测量角膜散光的可比性和可重复性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Oct;38(10):1764-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.036.
7
Corneal power measurement with a rotating Scheimpflug imaging system after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.撕囊镊自动角膜内皮移植术后旋转式 Scheimpflug 成像系统测量角膜屈光度。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Aug;36(8):1358-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.032.
8
Comparison of anterior segment measurements by 3 Scheimpflug tomographers and 1 Placido corneal topographer.三种 Scheimpflug 断层扫描仪和一种 Placido 角膜地形图仪测量前节的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Sep;37(9):1679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.055.
9
Corneal power measurements with the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera after myopic excimer laser surgery.准分子激光近视手术后使用Pentacam眼前节分析系统进行角膜屈光力测量。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 May;34(5):809-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.01.012.
10
Comparison of refractive outcomes using five devices for the assessment of preoperative corneal power.比较五种评估术前角膜屈光力的设备的屈光结果。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;40(5):425-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02777.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of total corneal power measurements obtained with different devices after myopic keratorefractive surgery.近视角膜屈光手术后使用不同设备获得的角膜总屈光力测量结果的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul 18;16(7):1117-1122. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.07.17. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparing Standard Keratometry and Total Keratometry Before and After Myopic Corneal Refractive Surgery With a Swept-Source OCT Biometer.使用扫频光学相干断层扫描生物测量仪比较近视角膜屈光手术前后的标准角膜曲率测量和总角膜曲率测量
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 12;9:928027. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.928027. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism between IOLMaster and Pentacam.
IOLMaster 与 Pentacam 测量的总角膜散光比较
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 8;2022:9236006. doi: 10.1155/2022/9236006. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparison of IOL-Master 700 and IOL-Master 500 biometers in ocular biological parameters of adolescents.IOL-Master 700与IOL-Master 500生物测量仪在青少年眼部生物学参数中的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 18;14(7):1013-1017. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.07.08. eCollection 2021.
5
Evaluation and comparison of a novel Scheimpflug-based optical biometer with standard partial coherence interferometry for biometry and intraocular lens power calculation.一种基于Scheimpflug原理的新型光学生物测量仪与标准部分相干干涉测量法在生物测量和人工晶状体屈光度计算方面的评估与比较。
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Apr;21(4):326. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9757. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
Agreement of keratometric readings measured using rotating Scheimpflug imaging, auto-refractokeratometer, and biograph in eyes with keratoconus.使用旋转式 Scheimpflug 成像仪、自动折射角膜计和生物测量仪测量圆锥角膜眼的角膜曲率读数的一致性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 May;41(5):1659-1669. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01720-5. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Agreement between IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam HR for keratometry assessment in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients.IOLMaster 500与Pentacam HR在2型糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者角膜曲率测量评估中的一致性。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 18;13(6):920-926. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.06.10. eCollection 2020.
8
Corneal Astigmatism Measurements Comparison among Ray-Tracing Aberrometry, Partial Coherence Interferometry, and Scheimpflug Imaging System.光线追踪像差仪、部分相干干涉仪和眼前节分析系统测量角膜散光的比较
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 1;2020:3012748. doi: 10.1155/2020/3012748. eCollection 2020.
9
Agreement between Pentacam and handheld Auto-Refractor/Keratometer for keratometry measurement.Pentacam与手持自动验光仪/角膜曲率计在角膜曲率测量方面的一致性。
J Optom. 2019 Oct-Dec;12(4):232-239. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
10
Keratometric measurements and IOL calculations in pseudophakic post-DSAEK patients.人工晶状体植入术后DSAEK患者的角膜曲率测量及人工晶状体计算
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 17;18(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0931-y.