Suppr超能文献

文化内和文化间的变化:个体差异与荣誉文化、面子文化和尊严文化的文化逻辑。

Within- and between-culture variation: individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures.

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, Level 4, 90 Stamford Road, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178903.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Mar;100(3):507-26. doi: 10.1037/a0022151.

Abstract

The CuPS (Culture × Person × Situation) approach attempts to jointly consider culture and individual differences, without treating either as noise and without reducing one to the other. Culture is important because it helps define psychological situations and create meaningful clusters of behavior according to particular logics. Individual differences are important because individuals vary in the extent to which they endorse or reject a culture's ideals. Further, because different cultures are organized by different logics, individual differences mean something different in each. Central to these studies are concepts of honor-related violence and individual worth as being inalienable versus socially conferred. We illustrate our argument with 2 experiments involving participants from honor, face, and dignity cultures. The studies showed that the same "type" of person who was most helpful, honest, and likely to behave with integrity in one culture was the "type" of person least likely to do so in another culture. We discuss how CuPS can provide a rudimentary but integrated approach to understanding both within- and between-culture variation.

摘要

CuPS(文化×个体×情境)方法试图共同考虑文化和个体差异,既不将其视为噪声,也不将其一概而论。文化很重要,因为它有助于定义心理情境,并根据特定的逻辑创造有意义的行为集群。个体差异很重要,因为个体在认同或拒绝文化理想的程度上存在差异。此外,由于不同的文化是由不同的逻辑组织的,因此个体差异在每种文化中都有不同的含义。与荣誉相关的暴力和个人价值不可剥夺与社会赋予相关的概念是这些研究的核心。我们用涉及荣誉、面子和尊严文化的参与者的 2 个实验来说明我们的论点。研究表明,在一种文化中最乐于助人、最诚实、最有可能表现出正直行为的“同一类型”的人,在另一种文化中最不可能这样做。我们讨论了 CuPS 如何为理解文化内和文化间的变异性提供一个基本但综合的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验