• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Informative cluster sizes for subcluster-level covariates and weighted generalized estimating equations.亚组水平协变量的信息性聚类大小与加权广义估计方程。
Biometrics. 2011 Sep;67(3):843-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01542.x. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
2
Estimating marginal treatment effect in cluster randomized trials with multi-level missing outcomes.在具有多层次缺失结局的整群随机试验中估计边际治疗效果。
Biometrics. 2024 Oct 3;80(4). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae135.
3
Rank-based inference for covariate and group effects in clustered data in presence of informative intra-cluster group size.存在信息丰富的聚类组内大小的情况下,聚类数据中协变量和组效应的基于等级的推断。
Stat Med. 2018 Dec 30;37(30):4807-4822. doi: 10.1002/sim.7979. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
4
Inference for marginal linear models for clustered longitudinal data with potentially informative cluster sizes.具有潜在信息性簇大小的聚类纵向数据边缘线性模型的推断。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Aug;20(4):347-67. doi: 10.1177/0962280209347043. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
5
Test Statistics and Statistical Inference for Data With Informative Cluster Sizes.具有信息性聚类大小的数据的检验统计量与统计推断。
Biom J. 2025 Feb;67(1):e70021. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70021.
6
Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.在协变量相关缺失下缺失二分类结局的群组随机试验中,加权作为多水平多重插补替代方法的性质和陷阱。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 May;29(5):1338-1353. doi: 10.1177/0962280219859915. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Informative cluster size in cluster-randomised trials: A case study from the TRIGGER trial.信息聚类大小在整群随机临床试验中的应用:来自 TRIGGER 试验的案例研究。
Clin Trials. 2023 Dec;20(6):661-669. doi: 10.1177/17407745231186094. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
8
Pseudo-value regression of clustered multistate current status data with informative cluster sizes.具有信息性簇大小的聚集多状态现状数据的伪值回归。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Aug;32(8):1494-1510. doi: 10.1177/09622802231176033. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
9
Cluster adjusted regression for displaced subject data (CARDS): Marginal inference under potentially informative temporal cluster size profiles.针对失访受试者数据的聚类调整回归(CARDS):在潜在信息性时间聚类规模分布下的边际推断。
Biometrics. 2016 Jun;72(2):441-51. doi: 10.1111/biom.12456. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
Accounting for interactions and complex inter-subject dependency in estimating treatment effect in cluster-randomized trials with missing outcomes.在存在缺失结局的整群随机试验中估计治疗效果时考虑交互作用和复杂的受试者间依赖性。
Biometrics. 2016 Dec;72(4):1066-1077. doi: 10.1111/biom.12519. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing risk factors for post-acute recovery in older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia: A new semi-parametric model for large-scale medicare claims.分析老年阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆患者康复后风险因素:大规模医疗保险索赔的新半参数模型。
Stat Med. 2024 Feb 28;43(5):1003-1018. doi: 10.1002/sim.9982. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
2
Informative cluster size in cluster-randomised trials: A case study from the TRIGGER trial.信息聚类大小在整群随机临床试验中的应用:来自 TRIGGER 试验的案例研究。
Clin Trials. 2023 Dec;20(6):661-669. doi: 10.1177/17407745231186094. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Pseudo-value regression of clustered multistate current status data with informative cluster sizes.具有信息性簇大小的聚集多状态现状数据的伪值回归。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Aug;32(8):1494-1510. doi: 10.1177/09622802231176033. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
Multiple imputation methods for missing multilevel ordinal outcomes.缺失多水平有序结局的多重插补方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 May 9;23(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01909-5.
5
Estimands in cluster-randomized trials: choosing analyses that answer the right question.在整群随机临床试验中的估算指标:选择回答正确问题的分析方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):107-118. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac131.
6
Re-randomisation trials in multi-episode settings: Estimands and independence estimators.多阶段设置下的重新随机化试验:目标和独立性估计量。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):1342-1354. doi: 10.1177/09622802221094140. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
7
Independence estimators for re-randomisation trials in multi-episode settings: a simulation study.多阶段重随机化试验的独立性估计量:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 30;21(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01433-4.
8
Risk prediction in multicentre studies when there is confounding by cluster or informative cluster size.多中心研究中存在簇或信息簇大小混杂时的风险预测。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jul 4;21(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01321-x.
9
Clinical risk prediction models and informative cluster size: Assessing the performance of a suicide risk prediction algorithm.临床风险预测模型和信息聚类大小:评估自杀风险预测算法的性能。
Biom J. 2021 Oct;63(7):1375-1388. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000199. Epub 2021 May 24.
10
Association of personal exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields with pregnancy outcomes among women seeking fertility treatment in a longitudinal cohort study.在一项纵向队列研究中,个人暴露于工频磁场与寻求生育治疗的女性妊娠结局之间的关联。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Nov;114(5):1058-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.044. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Marginal analyses of clustered data when cluster size is informative.当聚类大小具有信息性时对聚类数据的边际分析。
Biometrics. 2003 Mar;59(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00005.
2
Analysis of clustered binary outcomes using within-cluster paired resampling.使用聚类内配对重抽样分析聚类二元结局。
Biometrics. 2002 Jun;58(2):332-41. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00332.x.
3
Between-subject and within-subject statistical information in dental research.牙科研究中的受试者间和受试者内统计信息。
J Dent Res. 2000 Oct;79(10):1778-81. doi: 10.1177/00220345000790100801.
4
Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.边缘结构模型与流行病学中的因果推断
Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):550-60. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011.
5
Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data.聚类数据分析中的组间和组内协变量效应
Biometrics. 1998 Jun;54(2):638-45.

亚组水平协变量的信息性聚类大小与加权广义估计方程。

Informative cluster sizes for subcluster-level covariates and weighted generalized estimating equations.

作者信息

Huang Ying, Leroux Brian

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2011 Sep;67(3):843-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01542.x. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01542.x
PMID:21281273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3137732/
Abstract

Williamson, Datta, and Satten's (2003, Biometrics 59, 36-42) cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations (CWGEEs) are effective in adjusting for bias due to informative cluster sizes for cluster-level covariates. We show that CWGEE may not perform well, however, for covariates that can take different values within a cluster if the numbers of observations at each covariate level are informative. On the other hand, inverse probability of treatment weighting accounts for informative treatment propensity but not for informative cluster size. Motivated by evaluating the effect of a binary exposure in presence of such types of informativeness, we propose several weighted GEE estimators, with weights related to the size of a cluster as well as the distribution of the binary exposure within the cluster. Choice of the weights depends on the population of interest and the nature of the exposure. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate the superior performance of the new estimators compared to existing estimators such as from GEE, CWGEE, and inverse probability of treatment-weighted GEE. We demonstrate the use of our method using an example examining covariate effects on the risk of dental caries among small children.

摘要

威廉姆森、达塔和萨滕(2003年,《生物统计学》第59卷,第36 - 42页)提出的聚类加权广义估计方程(CWGEEs)在调整聚类水平协变量因信息性聚类大小导致的偏差方面很有效。然而,我们表明,如果每个协变量水平上的观测数量具有信息性,对于聚类内可取值不同的协变量,CWGEE可能表现不佳。另一方面,治疗权重的逆概率考虑了信息性治疗倾向,但未考虑信息性聚类大小。出于评估在存在此类信息性情况下二元暴露效应的动机,我们提出了几种加权广义估计方程估计量,其权重与聚类大小以及聚类内二元暴露的分布有关。权重的选择取决于目标总体和暴露的性质。通过模拟研究,我们证明了新估计量相对于现有估计量(如广义估计方程、CWGEE和治疗权重逆概率加权广义估计方程的估计量)具有更优的性能。我们通过一个研究协变量对幼儿龋齿风险影响的例子展示了我们方法的应用。