ARS-USDA-Livestock Behavior Research Unit, 125 S. Russell St., Poultry Sci. Bldg., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2011 May 3;103(2):188-96. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.019. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
Understanding autonomic nervous system functioning, which mediates behavioral and physiological responses to stress, offers great potential for assessing farm animal stress and welfare. Evaluation of heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure variability (BPV), using time and frequency domain analyses may provide a sensitive and reliable measure of affective states and stress-mediated changes in sympathetic and parasympathetic tones. The aim of this research was to define low (LF) and high frequency (HF) power spectral ranges using pharmacological autonomic blockade, and to examine HRV and BPV parameter changes in response to atropine and propranolol in swine. Ten, 13-week old, barrows (n=6) and gilts (n=4) underwent surgery to place an intra-cardiac electrode and a blood pressure catheter attached to a biotelemetric transmitter; pigs had a 3-week recovery period prior to data collection. Each pig was subjected to administration of 4 intravenous (i.v.) drug treatments: a control treatment, 3 mL of saline, and 3 blockade treatments; 0.1 mg/kg of atropine, 1.0 mg/kg of propranolol, and .1 mg/kg of atropine together with 1.0 mg/kg of propranolol. All treatments were delivered by injection in the jugular vein with a minimum of 48 h between individual treatments. Behavior, ECG and blood pressure data were recorded continuously for a total of 1h, from 30 min pre-injection to 30 min post-injection. For data analyses, two 512-beat intervals were selected for each treatment while the pig was lying and inactive. The first interval was selected from the pre-injection period (baseline), and the second was selected between 10 and 30 min post-injection. Time and frequency domain (power spectral density) analyses were performed on each data interval. Subsequent, LF and HF bands from the power spectral densities were defined based on general linear and regression analyses. The HRV and BPV were computed with a covariate (baseline) factorial analysis of treatment by sex interaction, and day of injection, with mixed models and Tukey's post-hoc tests. The best-fit range for LF was 0.0-0.09 Hz, and HF was 0.09-2.0 Hz (r²: 0.41 and 0.43, respectively). Propranolol and saline injections led to a greater overall total power and overall higher inter-beat interval, HF and LF power. Atropine led to a dominant sympathovagal balance of the cardiac activity in pigs. In addition, atropine led to an increase in LF power of both systolic and diastolic blood pressures in gilts suggesting vagal tone mediation of BPV. The understanding of autonomic regulation of HRV and BPV in domestic swine facilitates our ability to detect and quantify stress responses, and broadens its application in assessing farm animal welfare.
了解自主神经系统的功能,它介导了动物对压力的行为和生理反应,为评估农场动物的应激和福利提供了很大的潜力。使用时频域分析评估心率变异性 (HRV) 和血压变异性 (BPV),可能提供一种敏感和可靠的方法来测量情感状态以及应激介导的交感神经和副交感神经活动的变化。本研究的目的是使用药理学自主神经阻断来定义低频 (LF) 和高频 (HF) 功率谱范围,并检查阿托品和普萘洛尔对猪的 HRV 和 BPV 参数变化的影响。10 头 13 周龄公猪(n=6)和母猪(n=4)接受了心脏内电极和连接生物遥测发射器的血压导管的手术;在收集数据之前,猪有 3 周的恢复期。每头猪接受 4 种静脉(i.v.)药物处理:对照处理、3 毫升生理盐水和 3 种阻断处理;0.1mg/kg 阿托品、1.0mg/kg 普萘洛尔和.1mg/kg 阿托品加 1.0mg/kg 普萘洛尔。所有处理均通过颈静脉注射,每次处理之间至少间隔 48 小时。在总共 1 小时的时间内,从注射前 30 分钟到注射后 30 分钟,连续记录行为、心电图和血压数据。对于数据分析,在猪躺着且不活动时,为每种处理选择两个 512 拍的间隔。第一个间隔从注射前选择(基线),第二个间隔在注射后 10-30 分钟之间选择。对每个数据间隔进行时域和频域(功率谱密度)分析。随后,根据一般线性和回归分析确定功率谱密度中的 LF 和 HF 带。使用混合模型和 Tukey 的事后检验,对 HRV 和 BPV 进行具有协变量(基线)的处理因素性别交互作用和注射日的析因分析。LF 的最佳拟合范围为 0.0-0.09Hz,HF 为 0.09-2.0Hz(r²:分别为 0.41 和 0.43)。普萘洛尔和生理盐水注射导致总功率整体增加和整体更高的心动间隔、HF 和 LF 功率。阿托品导致猪的心脏活动交感神经-迷走神经平衡占主导地位。此外,阿托品导致母猪的收缩压和舒张压的 LF 功率增加,表明 BPV 介导的迷走神经张力。对猪自主神经调节 HRV 和 BPV 的理解有助于我们检测和量化应激反应,并扩大其在评估农场动物福利方面的应用。