• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无癫痫发作受试者和颞叶癫痫患者的磁共振图像数据集,用于验证海马分割技术。

Dataset of magnetic resonance images of nonepileptic subjects and temporal lobe epilepsy patients for validation of hippocampal segmentation techniques.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

出版信息

Neuroinformatics. 2011 Dec;9(4):335-46. doi: 10.1007/s12021-010-9096-4.

DOI:10.1007/s12021-010-9096-4
PMID:21286946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4501402/
Abstract

The hippocampus has become the focus of research in several neurodegenerative disorders. Automatic segmentation of this structure from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging scans of the brain facilitates this work. Segmentation techniques must be evaluated using a dataset of MR images with accurate hippocampal outlines generated manually. Manual segmentation is not a trivial task. Lack of a unique segmentation protocol and poor image quality are only two factors that have confounded the consistency required for comparative study. We have developed a publicly available dataset of T1-weighted (T1W) MR images of epileptic and nonepileptic subjects along with their hippocampal outlines to provide a means of evaluation of segmentation techniques. This dataset contains 50 T1W MR images, 40 epileptic and ten nonepileptic. All images were manually segmented by a widely used protocol. Twenty five images were selected for training and were provided with hippocampal labels. Twenty five other images were provided without labels for testing algorithms. The users are allowed to evaluate their generated labels for the test images using 11 segmentation similarity metrics. Using this dataset, we evaluated two segmentation algorithms, Brain Parser and Classifier Fusion and Labeling (CFL), trained by the training set. For Brain Parser, an average Dice coefficient of 0.64 was obtained with the testing set. For CFL, this value was 0.75. Such findings indicate a need for further improvement of segmentation algorithms in order to enhance reliability.

摘要

海马体已成为多种神经退行性疾病研究的焦点。自动从大脑磁共振(MR)成像扫描中分割该结构有助于这项工作。分割技术必须使用具有手动生成的准确海马轮廓的 MR 图像数据集进行评估。手动分割不是一项简单的任务。缺乏独特的分割协议和较差的图像质量只是两个使比较研究所需的一致性变得复杂的因素。我们开发了一个公开的癫痫和非癫痫患者的 T1 加权(T1W)MR 图像及其海马轮廓数据集,以提供评估分割技术的方法。该数据集包含 50 个 T1W MR 图像,40 个癫痫患者和 10 个非癫痫患者。所有图像均通过广泛使用的协议进行手动分割。选择 25 张图像进行训练,并提供海马标签。另外 25 张图像没有标签,用于测试算法。用户可以使用 11 种分割相似性度量标准来评估他们为测试图像生成的标签。使用该数据集,我们评估了两种分割算法,Brain Parser 和 Classifier Fusion and Labeling (CFL),它们是通过训练集进行训练的。对于 Brain Parser,使用测试集获得的平均骰子系数为 0.64。对于 CFL,这个值是 0.75。这些发现表明需要进一步改进分割算法,以提高可靠性。

相似文献

1
Dataset of magnetic resonance images of nonepileptic subjects and temporal lobe epilepsy patients for validation of hippocampal segmentation techniques.无癫痫发作受试者和颞叶癫痫患者的磁共振图像数据集,用于验证海马分割技术。
Neuroinformatics. 2011 Dec;9(4):335-46. doi: 10.1007/s12021-010-9096-4.
2
Comparative performance evaluation of automated segmentation methods of hippocampus from magnetic resonance images of temporal lobe epilepsy patients.颞叶癫痫患者磁共振图像中海马体自动分割方法的比较性能评估
Med Phys. 2016 Jan;43(1):538. doi: 10.1118/1.4938411.
3
Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates.使用多个自动生成的模板对整个海马体及其子区进行多图谱分割。
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:494-512. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.054. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
4
Hippocampal volumetry for lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy: automated versus manual methods.海马体积测量在颞叶癫痫侧化中的应用:自动方法与手动方法。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan;54 Suppl 1:S218-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.066. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
5
Training labels for hippocampal segmentation based on the EADC-ADNI harmonized hippocampal protocol.基于 EADC-ADNI 协调的海马协议的海马分割训练标签。
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Feb;11(2):175-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
6
Statistical validation of automatic methods for hippocampus segmentation in MR images of epileptic patients.癫痫患者磁共振图像中海马体分割自动方法的统计验证。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:4707-10. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944675.
7
Surface-based multi-template automated hippocampal segmentation: application to temporal lobe epilepsy.基于表面的多模板自动海马分割:在颞叶癫痫中的应用。
Med Image Anal. 2012 Oct;16(7):1445-55. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 May 3.
8
Accuracy Validation of an Automated Method for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.磁共振成像中前列腺自动分割方法的准确性验证。
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Dec;30(6):782-795. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-9964-7.
9
Automatic hippocampal segmentation in temporal lobe epilepsy: impact of developmental abnormalities.自动海马分割在颞叶癫痫中的应用:发育异常的影响。
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.040. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
10
Hippocampal subfields segmentation in brain MR images using generative adversarial networks.基于生成对抗网络的脑 MRI 中海马亚区分割。
Biomed Eng Online. 2019 Jan 21;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0623-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Hippocampus substructure segmentation using morphological vision transformer learning.基于形态学视觉转换器学习的海马亚结构分割。
Phys Med Biol. 2023 Dec 1;68(23):235013. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0d45.
2
Deep convolutional neural network for hippocampus segmentation with boundary region refinement.基于边界区域细化的深度卷积神经网络的海马体分割。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2023 Sep;61(9):2329-2339. doi: 10.1007/s11517-023-02836-9. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
Saliency-guided deep learning network for automatic tumor bed volume delineation in post-operative breast irradiation.

本文引用的文献

1
FLAIR signal and texture analysis for lateralizing mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.FLAIR 信号及纹理分析在外侧间脑癫痫中的应用。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1559-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.064. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
2
Defining the human hippocampus in cerebral magnetic resonance images--an overview of current segmentation protocols.在脑磁共振图像中定义人类海马体——当前分割方案概述
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1185-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.019. Epub 2009 May 15.
3
Online resource for validation of brain segmentation methods.
基于显著度引导的深度学习网络用于术后乳房放疗中肿瘤靶区自动勾画。
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Aug 27;66(17). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac176d.
4
Combined Atlas and Convolutional Neural Network-Based Segmentation of the Hippocampus from MRI According to the ADNI Harmonized Protocol.基于联合图谱和卷积神经网络的 ADNI 标准化协议 MRI 海马体分割。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;21(7):2427. doi: 10.3390/s21072427.
5
FCN Based Label Correction for Multi-Atlas Guided Organ Segmentation.基于 FCN 的多图谱引导器官分割标签校正。
Neuroinformatics. 2020 Apr;18(2):319-331. doi: 10.1007/s12021-019-09448-5.
6
Dilated Dense U-Net for Infant Hippocampus Subfield Segmentation.用于婴儿海马体亚区域分割的扩张密集U型网络
Front Neuroinform. 2019 Apr 24;13:30. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2019.00030. eCollection 2019.
7
Automated and manual hippocampal segmentation techniques: Comparison of results, reproducibility and clinical applicability.自动化和手动海马分割技术:结果比较、可重复性和临床适用性。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;21:101574. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
8
Contribution of Quantitative Amygdalar MR FLAIR Signal Analysis for Lateralization of Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.定量杏仁核磁共振 FLAIR 信号分析对内侧颞叶癫痫侧化的作用。
J Neuroimaging. 2018 Nov;28(6):666-675. doi: 10.1111/jon.12549. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
Patch-Based Label Fusion with Structured Discriminant Embedding for Hippocampus Segmentation.基于斑块的标签融合与结构化判别嵌入的海马体分割。
Neuroinformatics. 2018 Oct;16(3-4):411-423. doi: 10.1007/s12021-018-9364-2.
10
Metric Learning for Multi-atlas based Segmentation of Hippocampus.用于基于多图谱的海马体分割的度量学习
Neuroinformatics. 2017 Jan;15(1):41-50. doi: 10.1007/s12021-016-9312-y.
用于脑部分割方法验证的在线资源。
Neuroimage. 2009 Apr 1;45(2):431-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.066. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
4
Brain anatomical structure segmentation by hybrid discriminative/generative models.基于混合判别/生成模型的脑解剖结构分割
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Apr;27(4):495-508. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.908121.
5
Classifier selection strategies for label fusion using large atlas databases.使用大型图谱数据库进行标签融合的分类器选择策略
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10(Pt 1):523-31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75757-3_64.
6
Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures.人类皮质结构三维概率图谱的构建。
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1064-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.031. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
7
MR-based in vivo hippocampal volumetrics: 1. Review of methodologies currently employed.基于磁共振成像的活体海马体积测量:1. 当前所用方法综述。
Mol Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;10(2):147-59. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001580.
8
Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains.基于图谱的图像分割中图谱选择策略的评估及其在蜜蜂大脑共聚焦显微镜图像中的应用
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1428-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.010.
9
HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration.HAMMER:用于弹性配准的分层属性匹配机制
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Nov;21(11):1421-39. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2002.803111.
10
Fast robust automated brain extraction.快速鲁棒的自动脑提取
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10062.