Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Neuroinformatics. 2011 Dec;9(4):335-46. doi: 10.1007/s12021-010-9096-4.
The hippocampus has become the focus of research in several neurodegenerative disorders. Automatic segmentation of this structure from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging scans of the brain facilitates this work. Segmentation techniques must be evaluated using a dataset of MR images with accurate hippocampal outlines generated manually. Manual segmentation is not a trivial task. Lack of a unique segmentation protocol and poor image quality are only two factors that have confounded the consistency required for comparative study. We have developed a publicly available dataset of T1-weighted (T1W) MR images of epileptic and nonepileptic subjects along with their hippocampal outlines to provide a means of evaluation of segmentation techniques. This dataset contains 50 T1W MR images, 40 epileptic and ten nonepileptic. All images were manually segmented by a widely used protocol. Twenty five images were selected for training and were provided with hippocampal labels. Twenty five other images were provided without labels for testing algorithms. The users are allowed to evaluate their generated labels for the test images using 11 segmentation similarity metrics. Using this dataset, we evaluated two segmentation algorithms, Brain Parser and Classifier Fusion and Labeling (CFL), trained by the training set. For Brain Parser, an average Dice coefficient of 0.64 was obtained with the testing set. For CFL, this value was 0.75. Such findings indicate a need for further improvement of segmentation algorithms in order to enhance reliability.
海马体已成为多种神经退行性疾病研究的焦点。自动从大脑磁共振(MR)成像扫描中分割该结构有助于这项工作。分割技术必须使用具有手动生成的准确海马轮廓的 MR 图像数据集进行评估。手动分割不是一项简单的任务。缺乏独特的分割协议和较差的图像质量只是两个使比较研究所需的一致性变得复杂的因素。我们开发了一个公开的癫痫和非癫痫患者的 T1 加权(T1W)MR 图像及其海马轮廓数据集,以提供评估分割技术的方法。该数据集包含 50 个 T1W MR 图像,40 个癫痫患者和 10 个非癫痫患者。所有图像均通过广泛使用的协议进行手动分割。选择 25 张图像进行训练,并提供海马标签。另外 25 张图像没有标签,用于测试算法。用户可以使用 11 种分割相似性度量标准来评估他们为测试图像生成的标签。使用该数据集,我们评估了两种分割算法,Brain Parser 和 Classifier Fusion and Labeling (CFL),它们是通过训练集进行训练的。对于 Brain Parser,使用测试集获得的平均骰子系数为 0.64。对于 CFL,这个值是 0.75。这些发现表明需要进一步改进分割算法,以提高可靠性。