代际传递的适应功能：社会经济地位和人类发展的交互模型的检验。
Intergenerational transmission of adaptive functioning: a test of the interactionist model of SES and human development.
机构信息
University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
出版信息
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):33-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01539.x.
Abstract
The interactionist model (IM) of human development (R. D. Conger & M. B. Donellan, 2007) proposes that the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and human development involves a dynamic interplay that includes both social causation (SES influences human development) and social selection (individual characteristics affect SES). Using a multigenerational data set involving 271 families, the current study finds empirical support for the IM. Adolescent personality characteristics indicative of social competence, goal-setting, hard work, and emotional stability predicted later SES, parenting, and family characteristics that were related to the positive development of a third-generation child. Processes of both social selection and social causation appear to account for the association between SES and dimensions of human development indicative of healthy functioning across multiple generations.
摘要
人类发展的互动模型（IM）（R. D. Conger 和 M. B. Donellan，2007）提出，社会经济地位（SES）与人类发展之间的关联涉及一种动态的相互作用，其中包括社会因果关系（SES 影响人类发展）和社会选择（个体特征影响 SES）。本研究使用一个涉及 271 个家庭的多代数据集，为 IM 提供了实证支持。青少年具有社会能力、目标设定、努力工作和情绪稳定特征的个性，预示着后来的 SES、育儿和家庭特征，这些特征与第三代孩子的积极发展有关。社会选择和社会因果关系的过程似乎都解释了 SES 与多个世代中健康功能的人类发展维度之间的关联。
相似文献
1
Intergenerational transmission of adaptive functioning: a test of the interactionist model of SES and human development.代际传递的适应功能：社会经济地位和人类发展的交互模型的检验。
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):33-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01539.x.
2
Evaluation of the interactionist model of socioeconomic status and problem behavior: a developmental cascade across generations.评价社会经济地位与问题行为的相互作用模型：代际发展级联。
Dev Psychopathol. 2010 Aug;22(3):695-713. doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000374.
3
An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development.关于人类发展社会经济背景的互动主义视角。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:175-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551.
4
Adolescent personality as a prospective predictor of parenting: an interactionist perspective.青少年个性作为前瞻性预测因素对养育行为的影响：一个交互作用的观点。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Dec;24(6):721-30. doi: 10.1037/a0021732.
5
Parental socioeconomic status, communication, and children's vocabulary development: a third-generation test of the family investment model.父母的社会经济地位、沟通与儿童词汇发展：家庭投资模型的第三代检验。
Child Dev. 2013 May-Jun;84(3):1046-62. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12023. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
6
Income is not enough: incorporating material hardship into models of income associations with parenting and child development.收入并不够：将物质困难纳入收入与育儿及儿童发展关系的模型中。
Child Dev. 2007 Jan-Feb;78(1):70-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00986.x.
7
Maternal and family predictors of infant psychological development in at-risk families: A multilevel longitudinal study.高危家庭中母婴和家庭因素对婴儿心理发展的预测：一项多层次纵向研究。
Res Nurs Health. 2020 Jan;43(1):17-27. doi: 10.1002/nur.21989. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
8
Social and economic antecedents and consequences of adolescent aggressive personality: Predictions from the interactionist model.青少年攻击性人格的社会经济前因与后果：来自互动主义模型的预测
Dev Psychopathol. 2015 Nov;27(4 Pt 1):1111-27. doi: 10.1017/S0954579415000711.
9
The intergenerational continuity of socioeconomic status: Effects of parenting, personality, and age at first romantic partnership.社会经济地位的代际连续性：养育方式、个性以及首次恋爱关系时的年龄的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Sep;30(6):647-56. doi: 10.1037/fam0000171. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
10
The determinants of parenting: a process model.育儿的决定因素：一个过程模型。
Child Dev. 1984 Feb;55(1):83-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1984.tb00275.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Research on the mechanism of the influence of family socioeconomic status on the Cardinal principle of young children.家庭社会经济地位对幼儿基数原则影响的机制研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 5;15(1):19735. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04693-y.
2
Family socioeconomic status and young children digital addiction: a moderated mediation model.家庭社会经济地位与幼儿数字成瘾：一个有调节的中介模型
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 27;15:1435575. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1435575. eCollection 2024.
3
Social poverty indicators with school bullying victimization: evidence from the global school-based student health survey (GSHS).社会贫困指标与校园欺凌受害：来自全球学生健康调查（GSHS）的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18119-3.
4
Is there intergenerational continuity in early life experiences? Findings from the Harvard Study of Adult Development.早期生活经历是否具有代际连续性？哈佛成人发展研究的发现。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Dec;37(8):1123-1136. doi: 10.1037/fam0001144. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
5
Hardship in the Heartland: Associations Between Rurality, Income, and Material Hardship.中心地带的困境：农村、收入与物质匮乏之间的关联
Rural Sociol. 2022 Sep;87(3):936-959. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12435. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
6
Impact of parental socioeconomic status on offspring's mental health: protocol for a longitudinal community-based study.父母社会经济地位对后代心理健康的影响：一项基于社区的纵向研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e038409. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038409.
7
Dynamic associations among socioeconomic status (SES), parenting investments, and conscientiousness across time and generations.社会经济地位（SES）、育儿投入与尽责性在不同时间和代际间的动态关联。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Feb;57(2):147-163. doi: 10.1037/dev0000463.
8
The Negative Impact of Economic Hardship on Adolescent Academic Engagement: An Examination Parental Investment and Family Stress Processes.经济困难对青少年学业参与的负面影响：对父母投资和家庭压力过程的考察。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 May;49(5):973-990. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01210-4. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Intergenerational congruence in adolescent onset of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use.青少年时期开始饮酒、吸烟和使用大麻的代际一致性。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Dec;34(8):839-851. doi: 10.1037/adb0000546. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Home Environment, Bilingual Preschooler's Receptive Mother Tongue Language Outcomes, and Social-Emotional and Behavioral Skills: One Stone for Two Birds?家庭环境、双语学龄前儿童的母语接受能力、社会情感与行为技能：一石二鸟？
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01640. eCollection 2019.
本文引用的文献
1
Socioeconomic Status, Family Processes, and Individual Development.社会经济地位、家庭环境与个体发展。
J Marriage Fam. 2010 Jun;72(3):685-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x.
2
Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis.运用积极心理学干预提升幸福感并缓解抑郁症状：一项便于实践的元分析。
J Clin Psychol. 2009 May;65(5):467-87. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20593.
3
Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample.多 informant 样本中“大五人格”的高阶因素
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Dec;91(6):1138-51. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138.
4
An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development.关于人类发展社会经济背景的互动主义视角。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:175-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551.
5
Impacts on children of a policy to promote employment and reduce poverty for low-income parents: new hope after 5 years.一项促进低收入父母就业和减贫政策对儿童的影响：5年后的新希望
Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;41(6):902-18. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.902.
6
Mothers' time with infant and time in employment as predictors of mother-child relationships and children's early development.母亲陪伴婴儿的时间和就业时间对母婴关系及儿童早期发育的预测作用
Child Dev. 2005 Mar-Apr;76(2):467-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00857.x.
7
Maternal nonstandard work schedules and child cognitive outcomes.母亲的非标准工作时间表与儿童认知结果。
Child Dev. 2005 Jan-Feb;76(1):137-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00835.x.
8
Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach.描绘正常与异常人格的结构：一种综合的层次方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jan;88(1):139-57. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139.
9
Fathers and mothers at play with their 2- and 3-year-olds: contributions to language and cognitive development.与2至3岁孩子玩耍的父母：对语言和认知发展的贡献。
Child Dev. 2004 Nov-Dec;75(6):1806-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00818.x.
10
Economic stress, parenting, and child adjustment in Mexican American and European American families.墨西哥裔美国家庭和欧裔美国家庭中的经济压力、养育方式与儿童适应情况
Child Dev. 2004 Nov-Dec;75(6):1632-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00807.x.
Zotero 插件