代际传递的适应功能：社会经济地位和人类发展的交互模型的检验。
Intergenerational transmission of adaptive functioning: a test of the interactionist model of SES and human development.
机构信息
University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
出版信息
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):33-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01539.x.
Abstract
The interactionist model (IM) of human development (R. D. Conger & M. B. Donellan, 2007) proposes that the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and human development involves a dynamic interplay that includes both social causation (SES influences human development) and social selection (individual characteristics affect SES). Using a multigenerational data set involving 271 families, the current study finds empirical support for the IM. Adolescent personality characteristics indicative of social competence, goal-setting, hard work, and emotional stability predicted later SES, parenting, and family characteristics that were related to the positive development of a third-generation child. Processes of both social selection and social causation appear to account for the association between SES and dimensions of human development indicative of healthy functioning across multiple generations.
摘要
人类发展的互动模型（IM）（R. D. Conger 和 M. B. Donellan，2007）提出，社会经济地位（SES）与人类发展之间的关联涉及一种动态的相互作用，其中包括社会因果关系（SES 影响人类发展）和社会选择（个体特征影响 SES）。本研究使用一个涉及 271 个家庭的多代数据集，为 IM 提供了实证支持。青少年具有社会能力、目标设定、努力工作和情绪稳定特征的个性，预示着后来的 SES、育儿和家庭特征，这些特征与第三代孩子的积极发展有关。社会选择和社会因果关系的过程似乎都解释了 SES 与多个世代中健康功能的人类发展维度之间的关联。
相似文献
1
Intergenerational transmission of adaptive functioning: a test of the interactionist model of SES and human development.
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):33-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01539.x.
2
Evaluation of the interactionist model of socioeconomic status and problem behavior: a developmental cascade across generations.
Dev Psychopathol. 2010 Aug;22(3):695-713. doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000374.
3
An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:175-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551.
4
Adolescent personality as a prospective predictor of parenting: an interactionist perspective.
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Dec;24(6):721-30. doi: 10.1037/a0021732.
5
Parental socioeconomic status, communication, and children's vocabulary development: a third-generation test of the family investment model.
Child Dev. 2013 May-Jun;84(3):1046-62. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12023. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
6
Income is not enough: incorporating material hardship into models of income associations with parenting and child development.
Child Dev. 2007 Jan-Feb;78(1):70-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00986.x.
7
Maternal and family predictors of infant psychological development in at-risk families: A multilevel longitudinal study.
Res Nurs Health. 2020 Jan;43(1):17-27. doi: 10.1002/nur.21989. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
8
Social and economic antecedents and consequences of adolescent aggressive personality: Predictions from the interactionist model.
Dev Psychopathol. 2015 Nov;27(4 Pt 1):1111-27. doi: 10.1017/S0954579415000711.
9
The intergenerational continuity of socioeconomic status: Effects of parenting, personality, and age at first romantic partnership.
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Sep;30(6):647-56. doi: 10.1037/fam0000171. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
10
The determinants of parenting: a process model.
Child Dev. 1984 Feb;55(1):83-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1984.tb00275.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Research on the mechanism of the influence of family socioeconomic status on the Cardinal principle of young children.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 5;15(1):19735. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04693-y.
2
Family socioeconomic status and young children digital addiction: a moderated mediation model.
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 27;15:1435575. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1435575. eCollection 2024.
3
Social poverty indicators with school bullying victimization: evidence from the global school-based student health survey (GSHS).
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18119-3.
4
Is there intergenerational continuity in early life experiences? Findings from the Harvard Study of Adult Development.
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Dec;37(8):1123-1136. doi: 10.1037/fam0001144. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
5
Hardship in the Heartland: Associations Between Rurality, Income, and Material Hardship.
Rural Sociol. 2022 Sep;87(3):936-959. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12435. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
6
Impact of parental socioeconomic status on offspring's mental health: protocol for a longitudinal community-based study.
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e038409. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038409.
7
Dynamic associations among socioeconomic status (SES), parenting investments, and conscientiousness across time and generations.
Dev Psychol. 2021 Feb;57(2):147-163. doi: 10.1037/dev0000463.
8
The Negative Impact of Economic Hardship on Adolescent Academic Engagement: An Examination Parental Investment and Family Stress Processes.
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 May;49(5):973-990. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01210-4. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Intergenerational congruence in adolescent onset of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Dec;34(8):839-851. doi: 10.1037/adb0000546. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Home Environment, Bilingual Preschooler's Receptive Mother Tongue Language Outcomes, and Social-Emotional and Behavioral Skills: One Stone for Two Birds?
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01640. eCollection 2019.
本文引用的文献
1
Socioeconomic Status, Family Processes, and Individual Development.
J Marriage Fam. 2010 Jun;72(3):685-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x.
2
Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis.
J Clin Psychol. 2009 May;65(5):467-87. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20593.
3
Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Dec;91(6):1138-51. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138.
4
An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:175-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551.
5
Impacts on children of a policy to promote employment and reduce poverty for low-income parents: new hope after 5 years.
Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;41(6):902-18. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.902.
6
Mothers' time with infant and time in employment as predictors of mother-child relationships and children's early development.
Child Dev. 2005 Mar-Apr;76(2):467-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00857.x.
7
Maternal nonstandard work schedules and child cognitive outcomes.
Child Dev. 2005 Jan-Feb;76(1):137-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00835.x.
8
Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jan;88(1):139-57. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139.
9
Fathers and mothers at play with their 2- and 3-year-olds: contributions to language and cognitive development.
Child Dev. 2004 Nov-Dec;75(6):1806-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00818.x.
10
Economic stress, parenting, and child adjustment in Mexican American and European American families.
Child Dev. 2004 Nov-Dec;75(6):1632-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00807.x.
Zotero 插件