Hasler Rebecca M, Gyssler Lena, Benneker Lorin, Martinolli Luca, Schötzau Andreas, Zimmermann Heinz, Exadaktylos Aristomenis K
University of Bern, Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2011 Feb 4;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-5-4.
In Switzerland there are about 150,000 equestrians. Horse related injuries, including head and spinal injuries, are frequently treated at our level I trauma centre.
To analyse injury patterns, protective factors, and risk factors related to horse riding, and to define groups of safer riders and those at greater risk
We present a retrospective and a case-control survey at conducted a tertiary trauma centre in Bern, Switzerland.Injured equestrians from July 2000 - June 2006 were retrospectively classified by injury pattern and neurological symptoms. Injured equestrians from July-December 2008 were prospectively collected using a questionnaire with 17 variables. The same questionnaire was applied in non-injured controls. Multiple logistic regression was performed, and combined risk factors were calculated using inference trees.
RETROSPECTIVE SURVEY: A total of 528 injuries occured in 365 patients. The injury pattern revealed as follows: extremities (32%: upper 17%, lower 15%), head (24%), spine (14%), thorax (9%), face (9%), pelvis (7%) and abdomen (2%). Two injuries were fatal. One case resulted in quadriplegia, one in paraplegia. CASE-CONTROL SURVEY: 61 patients and 102 controls (patients: 72% female, 28% male; controls: 63% female, 37% male) were included. Falls were most frequent (65%), followed by horse kicks (19%) and horse bites (2%). Variables statistically significant for the controls were: Older age (p = 0.015), male gender (p = 0.04) and holding a diploma in horse riding (p = 0.004). Inference trees revealed typical groups less and more likely to suffer injury.
Experience with riding and having passed a diploma in horse riding seem to be protective factors. Educational levels and injury risk should be graded within an educational level-injury risk index.
瑞士约有15万名马术爱好者。包括头部和脊柱损伤在内的与马匹相关的损伤,在我们的一级创伤中心经常得到治疗。
分析与骑马相关的损伤模式、保护因素和风险因素,并确定较安全的骑手群体和风险较高的群体。
我们在瑞士伯尔尼的一家三级创伤中心进行了一项回顾性研究和病例对照调查。对2000年7月至2006年6月期间受伤的马术爱好者,根据损伤模式和神经症状进行回顾性分类。2008年7月至12月期间受伤的马术爱好者,通过一份包含17个变量的问卷进行前瞻性收集。对未受伤的对照组也应用相同的问卷。进行多因素逻辑回归分析,并使用推理树计算综合风险因素。
回顾性研究:365名患者共发生528例损伤。损伤模式如下:四肢(32%:上肢17%,下肢15%)、头部(24%)、脊柱(14%)、胸部(9%)、面部(9%)、骨盆(7%)和腹部(2%)。两例损伤是致命的。一例导致四肢瘫痪,一例导致截瘫。病例对照研究:纳入61例患者和102例对照(患者:女性72%,男性28%;对照:女性63%,男性37%)。跌倒最为常见(65%),其次是被马踢(19%)和被马咬(2%)。对对照组具有统计学意义的变量为:年龄较大(p = 0.015)、男性(p = 0.04)和拥有马术文凭(p = 0.004)。推理树揭示了受伤可能性较小和较大的典型群体。
骑马经验和拥有马术文凭似乎是保护因素。应在教育水平-损伤风险指数内对教育水平和损伤风险进行分级。