Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211-0001, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Nov;120(4):868-77. doi: 10.1037/a0022126. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
Two nationally representative epidemiological samples (the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiological Survey and the National Epidemiological Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions) have been used to track changes in the prevalence of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) between 1992 and 2002 in the United States. Strikingly, estimates from these two data sets suggest that the lifetime prevalence of AUD increased by approximately 67% (from 18.2% to 30.3%) during this time frame. This article explores potential reasons for these discrepant estimates. Analyses indicated that a vast majority of change in lifetime AUD occurred with respect to alcohol abuse and not alcohol dependence. Most of this increase in abuse was attributable to self-reported changes in hazardous use that did not track with other archival measures of outcomes related to hazardous use in the population. Key methodological differences regarding the frequency requirements for prior-to-past-year alcohol abuse appeared to explain most of the discrepancy in lifetime AUD estimates. These findings, in conjunction with the relative lack of differences in the 12-month prevalence of AUDs, suggest that the discrepant lifetime estimates are likely due to methodological differences between the two surveys. These findings have important implications for substance use and other psychiatric surveillance and epidemiology where meaningful cross-temporal comparisons are desired.
两项具有全国代表性的流行病学样本(国家纵向酒精流行病学调查和国家酒精与相关状况流行病学调查)被用来追踪美国在 1992 年至 2002 年期间酒精使用障碍(AUD)患病率的变化。令人惊讶的是,这两个数据集的估计表明,终生 AUD 的患病率在此期间增加了约 67%(从 18.2%增至 30.3%)。本文探讨了这些差异估计的潜在原因。分析表明,终生 AUD 的变化主要与酒精滥用有关,而与酒精依赖无关。滥用的大部分增加归因于自我报告的危险使用变化,这些变化与人群中危险使用相关的其他档案测量结果不一致。关于过去一年之前酒精滥用的频率要求的关键方法差异似乎解释了终生 AUD 估计差异的大部分原因。这些发现,再加上 AUD 的 12 个月患病率相对缺乏差异,表明差异终生估计可能是由于两项调查之间的方法差异。这些发现对于物质使用和其他精神疾病监测和流行病学具有重要意义,因为人们希望进行有意义的跨时间比较。