Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK.
Health Expect. 2012 Mar;15(1):97-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00662.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
To conduct a systematic appraisal of the published literature reviews related to the impact of cancer on everyday life. This theme was identified as the top priority area for research by participants in the Macmillan Listening Study, which was the first UK-wide public consultation exercise to identify patients' priorities for cancer research.
The top priority area was divided into ten sub-themes, and a modified systematic review was undertaken for each sub-theme using electronic searches.
Literature review papers were included if they were written in English, involved patients diagnosed ≥18 years, any cancer types and published between 2000 and 2006.
Two thousand and two hundred and fifty-two potentially eligible papers were identified. Abstracts were read by the first author and selected for inclusion in the review. Twenty percentages of the papers were also read independently by other authors. Sixty-two review papers were finally selected.
The systematic appraisal revealed that some sub-themes of the patient-identified priority area (e.g., how to support family members of cancer patients) were under-researched, while other sub-themes (e.g., anxiety and depression experienced by cancer patients) had been explored to some extent. Certain areas of research interest to patients were found to have been explored; however, their significance was limited by the quality of the research.
The systematic appraisal highlights important areas for future research and the need for more effective dissemination of study findings to wider audiences, including service users. This study also indicates the need for further research to enhance the generalizability and/or significance of findings.
对已发表的与癌症对日常生活影响相关的文献综述进行系统评估。该主题是麦克米伦听力研究参与者确定的研究重点领域,这是英国首次针对确定癌症研究患者优先事项的全国性公众咨询活动。
将重点领域分为十个子主题,并针对每个子主题使用电子检索进行了改良的系统评价。
纳入标准为英文撰写、纳入 18 岁及以上诊断为癌症的患者、任何癌症类型、发表于 2000 年至 2006 年的文献综述论文。
共确定了 2252 篇可能符合条件的文献。第一作者阅读了摘要并选择纳入综述,其他作者也独立阅读了 20%的文献。最终选择了 62 篇综述论文。
系统评价显示,患者确定的优先事项重点领域的某些子主题(如如何支持癌症患者的家属)研究不足,而其他子主题(如癌症患者的焦虑和抑郁)则有所涉及。发现某些患者感兴趣的研究领域已经得到了探索;然而,由于研究质量的限制,其意义有限。
系统评价突出了未来研究的重要领域,以及向更广泛的受众(包括服务使用者)更有效地传播研究结果的必要性。本研究还表明需要进一步研究以增强研究结果的普遍性和/或重要性。