Suppr超能文献

超越梦想:与睡眠相关的运动对大脑发育有贡献吗?

Beyond dreams: do sleep-related movements contribute to brain development?

作者信息

Blumberg Mark S

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Delta Center, The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2010 Nov 1;1:140. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2010.00140. eCollection 2010.

Abstract

Conventional wisdom has long held that the twitches of sleeping infants and adults are by-products of a dreaming brain. With the discovery of active (or REM) sleep in the 1950s and the recognition soon thereafter that active sleep is characterized by inhibition of motor outflow, researchers elaborated on conventional wisdom and concluded that sleep-related twitches are epiphenomena that result from incomplete blockade of dream-related cortical activity. This view persists despite the fact that twitching is unaffected in infants and adults when the cortex is disconnected from the brainstem. In 1966, Roffwarg and colleagues introduced the ontogenetic hypothesis, which addressed the preponderance of active sleep in early infancy. This hypothesis posited that the brainstem mechanisms that produce active sleep provide direct ascending stimulation to the forebrain and descending stimulation to the musculature, thereby promoting brain and neuromuscular development. However, this hypothesis and the subsequent work that tested it did not directly address the developmental significance of twitching or sensory feedback as a contributor to activity-dependent development. Here I review recent findings that have inspired an elaboration of the ontogenetic hypothesis. Specifically, in addition to direct brainstem activation of cortex during active sleep, sensory feedback arising from limb twitches produces discrete and substantial activation of somatosensory cortex and, beyond that, of hippocampus. Delineating how twitching during active sleep contributes to the establishment, refinement, and maintenance of neural circuits may aid our understanding of the early developmental events that make sensorimotor integration possible. In addition, twitches may prove to be sensitive and powerful tools for assessing somatosensory function in humans across the lifespan as well as functional recovery in individuals with injuries or conditions that affect sensorimotor function.

摘要

长期以来,传统观点一直认为,睡眠中婴儿和成人的抽搐是大脑做梦的副产品。随着20世纪50年代快速眼动睡眠(REM睡眠)的发现,以及此后不久认识到快速眼动睡眠的特征是运动输出受到抑制,研究人员对传统观点进行了阐述,并得出结论:与睡眠相关的抽搐是梦相关皮层活动不完全受阻的附带现象。尽管当皮层与脑干断开连接时,婴儿和成人的抽搐不受影响,但这种观点仍然存在。1966年,罗夫瓦尔格及其同事提出了个体发生假说,该假说解释了婴儿早期快速眼动睡眠占优势的现象。这一假说假定,产生快速眼动睡眠的脑干机制向前脑提供直接的上行刺激,向肌肉组织提供下行刺激,从而促进大脑和神经肌肉的发育。然而,这一假说以及随后对其进行检验的研究并没有直接探讨抽搐或感觉反馈作为活动依赖性发育的一个因素所具有的发育意义。在此,我回顾了近期的研究发现,这些发现促使人们对个体发生假说进行了完善。具体而言,除了在快速眼动睡眠期间脑干对皮层的直接激活外,肢体抽搐产生的感觉反馈会引起体感皮层的离散且显著的激活,除此之外,还会引起海马体的激活。阐明快速眼动睡眠期间的抽搐如何有助于神经回路的建立、完善和维持,可能有助于我们理解使感觉运动整合成为可能的早期发育事件。此外,抽搐可能被证明是评估人类一生中体感功能以及评估受伤或患有影响感觉运动功能疾病的个体功能恢复情况的敏感且有力的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验