• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄勒冈州波特兰市自行车投资的成本和收益。

Costs and benefits of bicycling investments in Portland, Oregon.

机构信息

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2011 Jan;8 Suppl 1:S49-58. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s1.s49.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.8.s1.s49
PMID:21350262
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Promoting bicycling has great potential to increase overall physical activity; however, significant uncertainty exists with regard to the amount and effectiveness of investment needed for infrastructure. The objective of this study is to assess how costs of Portland's past and planned investments in bicycling relate to health and other benefits.

METHODS

Costs of investment plans are compared with 2 types of monetized health benefits, health care cost savings and value of statistical life savings. Levels of bicycling are estimated using past trends, future mode share goals, and a traffic demand model.

RESULTS

By 2040, investments in the range of $138 to $605 million will result in health care cost savings of $388 to $594 million, fuel savings of $143 to $218 million, and savings in value of statistical lives of $7 to $12 billion. The benefit-cost ratios for health care and fuel savings are between 3.8 and 1.2 to 1, and an order of magnitude larger when value of statistical lives is used.

CONCLUSIONS

This first of its kind cost-benefit analysis of investments in bicycling in a US city shows that such efforts are cost-effective, even when only a limited selection of benefits is considered.

摘要

背景

推广自行车出行对于增加整体身体活动量具有巨大潜力;然而,对于基础设施所需的投资数量和效果仍存在很大的不确定性。本研究旨在评估波特兰市过去和计划中的自行车投资成本与健康和其他效益的关系。

方法

将投资计划的成本与 2 种货币化健康效益(医疗保健成本节省和生命统计价值节省)进行比较。使用过去的趋势、未来的模式份额目标和交通需求模型来估计自行车出行水平。

结果

到 2040 年,投资 1.38 亿至 6.05 亿美元将带来 3.88 亿至 5.94 亿美元的医疗保健成本节省、1.43 亿至 2.18 亿美元的燃料节省和 7 亿至 120 亿美元的生命统计价值节省。医疗保健和燃料节省的效益成本比在 3.8 到 1.2 之间,而当使用生命统计价值时则大一个数量级。

结论

这是美国城市首次对自行车投资进行成本效益分析,表明即使只考虑有限的效益,此类投资也是具有成本效益的。

相似文献

1
Costs and benefits of bicycling investments in Portland, Oregon.俄勒冈州波特兰市自行车投资的成本和收益。
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Jan;8 Suppl 1:S49-58. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s1.s49.
2
An economic analysis of the health-related benefits associated with bicycle infrastructure investment in three Canadian cities.对加拿大三个城市自行车基础设施投资相关健康效益的经济分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0246419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246419. eCollection 2021.
3
From partnership to policy: the evolution of Active Living by Design in Portland, Oregon.从伙伴关系到政策:俄勒冈州波特兰市积极生活设计的演变。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6 Suppl 2):S436-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.008.
4
An economic evaluation of health-promotive built environment changes.促进健康的建筑环境变化的经济评价。
Prev Med. 2010 Jan;50 Suppl 1:S44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.019. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
5
The cost-effectiveness of bike lanes in New York City.纽约市自行车道的成本效益。
Inj Prev. 2017 Aug;23(4):239-243. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042057. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
Cost analysis of the built environment: the case of bike and pedestrian trials in Lincoln, Neb.建成环境的成本分析:以美国内布拉斯加州林肯市的自行车与行人试验为例
Am J Public Health. 2004 Apr;94(4):549-53. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.549.
7
Economic value of U.S. fossil fuel electricity health impacts.美国化石燃料发电对健康影响的经济价值。
Environ Int. 2013 Feb;52:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
8
Health economic assessment of a scenario to promote bicycling as active transport in Stockholm, Sweden.促进自行车出行在瑞典斯德哥尔摩作为一种主动交通方式的健康经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e030466. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030466.
9
Bicycling for transportation and health: the role of infrastructure.骑自行车用于出行与健康:基础设施的作用。
J Public Health Policy. 2009;30 Suppl 1:S95-110. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2008.56.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) for walking and cycling - experiences from 10 years of application of a health impact assessment tool in policy and practice.步行和骑行健康经济评估工具(HEAT)——健康影响评估工具在政策与实践中十年应用经验
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 May 26;5:1146761. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1146761. eCollection 2023.
2
Walkability and urban built environments-a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA).步行性与城市建成环境——健康影响评估(HIA)的系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 17;23(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15394-4.
3
The Health Cost of Transport in Cities.
城市交通的健康成本。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2021 Jun;8(2):196-201. doi: 10.1007/s40572-021-00308-6. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Is cycle network expansion cost-effective? A health economic evaluation of cycling in Oslo.自行车道网络扩展是否具有成本效益?对奥斯陆自行车运动的健康经济评估。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09764-5.
5
Dose-response association of workplace facilities and policies with commuter bicycling among adults.工作场所设施与政策与成年人通勤骑行之间的剂量反应关联。
J Transp Health. 2019 Sep;14. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2019.100603. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Improvements to the Built Environment Intended to Increase Physical Activity.改善建筑环境以增加身体活动的成本效益。
J Phys Act Health. 2019 May 1;16(5):308-317. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0329. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
7
Bicycle Facilities That Address Safety, Crime, and Economic Development: Perceptions from Morelia, Mexico.兼顾安全、犯罪和经济发展的自行车设施:来自墨西哥莫雷利亚的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 22;15(1):1. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010001.
8
New walking and cycling infrastructure and modal shift in the UK: A quasi-experimental panel study.英国新的步行和自行车基础设施与出行方式转变:一项准实验性面板研究。
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2017 Jan;95:320-333. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.017.
9
Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA): a study protocol for a multicentre project.通过可持续交通方式进行身体活动(PASTA):一项多中心项目的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 7;6(1):e009924. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009924.
10
Health Impacts of Increased Physical Activity from Changes in Transportation Infrastructure: Quantitative Estimates for Three Communities.交通基础设施变化带来的身体活动增加对健康的影响:三个社区的定量估计
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:812325. doi: 10.1155/2015/812325. Epub 2015 Oct 4.