Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Republic of Korea.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jul;19(7):853-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
Translation and transcultural adaptation of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS LK 2.0) into Korean language was performed, followed by test of psychometric properties.
A Korean version of the HOOS was produced according to internationally recommended guidelines, which included forward translation, reconciliation, back translation, harmonization, cognitive debriefing and proof reading. The psychometric properties including reliability and validity were evaluated. The reliability, including the internal consistency and test-retest reliability, was then evaluated in a hip osteoarthritis population (OA group, n=75). The validity, including the convergent validity was assessed comparing HOOS with the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) scale. Responsiveness was evaluated in a population scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA group, n=35).
All subscales of the HOOS showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha>0.7) without floor and ceiling effects. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) spanned from 0.78 to 0.93. In terms of convergent validity, Activity of Daily Living (ADL) subscale showed the strongest correlations with Physical Function (PF) (r=0.801) and Bodily Pain (BP) (r=0.810) in the subscales of SF-36. For responsiveness, all HOOS subscale scores improved significantly (P<0.05) postoperatively.
The Korean version of HOOS showed satisfactory internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and responsiveness. This study shows that the HOOS questionnaire developed in West is, with transcultural adaptation, relevant for use among patients in East Asia.
对髋关节障碍和骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS LK 2.0)进行韩文翻译和跨文化调适,并测试其心理测量学特性。
根据国际推荐的指南,制作了 HOOS 的韩文版本,包括正向翻译、协调、反向翻译、协调、认知性反馈和校对。评估了心理测量学特性,包括可靠性和有效性。在髋关节骨关节炎人群(OA 组,n=75)中评估了可靠性,包括内部一致性和重测信度。通过与简明健康调查问卷 36 项(SF-36)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)上的疼痛进行比较,评估了有效性,包括收敛效度。在计划接受全髋关节置换术的人群(THA 组,n=35)中评估了反应性。
HOOS 的所有分量表均表现出令人满意的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha>0.7),无地板和天花板效应。组内相关系数(ICC)范围为 0.78 至 0.93。在收敛有效性方面,日常生活活动(ADL)分量表与 SF-36 中的身体功能(PF)(r=0.801)和身体疼痛(BP)(r=0.810)分量表具有最强的相关性。在反应性方面,HOOS 的所有分量表评分在术后均显著改善(P<0.05)。
HOOS 的韩文版本表现出令人满意的内部一致性、重测信度、收敛有效性和反应性。本研究表明,经过跨文化调适,西方开发的 HOOS 问卷在东亚患者中具有相关性。