Suppr超能文献

生物力学和组织学评价多孔和非多孔生物补片在猪腹疝修补模型中的应用。

Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of fenestrated and nonfenestrated biologic mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Mar;212(3):327-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare tissue incorporation and adhesion characteristics of a novel fenestrated versus nonfenestrated crosslinked porcine dermal matrix (CPDM) (Bard CollaMend) in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Bilateral abdominal wall defects were created in 24 Yucatan minipigs, resulting in 48 defects, which were allowed to mature for 21 days. Twelve defects were repaired with fenestrated CPDM using a preperitoneal technique, 12 with fenestrated CPDM using an intraperitoneal technique, 12 with nonfenestrated CPDM using a preperitoneal technique, and 12 with nonfenestrated CPDM using an intraperitoneal technique. Half of the animals in the intraperitoneal group were euthanized after 1 month, and the other half after 3 months. Similarly, half of the animals in the preperitoneal group were euthanized after 1 month, and the other half after 6 months. Biomechanical testing and histologic evaluation were performed.

RESULTS

Intraperitoneal placement of the CPDM products resulted in significantly greater adhesed area compared with preperitoneal placement (p < 0.05). Tissue ingrowth into preperitoneal fenestrated and nonfenestrated CPDM resulted in significantly greater incorporation strengths after 6 months compared with 1 month (p = 0.03 and p < 0.0001). Histologic analysis showed significantly greater cellular infiltration, extracellular matrix deposition, and neovascularization, with less fibrous encapsulation through the center of the fenestrations compared with all other sites evaluated, including nonfenestrated grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic findings revealed increased tissue incorporation at fenestration sites compared with nonfenestrated grafts regardless of implant location or time in vivo. However, preperitoneal placement resulted in greater incorporation strength, less adhesed area, and lower adhesion scores compared with intraperitoneal placement for both fenestrated and nonfenestrated CPDM.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较新型有孔与无孔交联猪真皮基质(CPDM)(Bard CollaMend)在猪腹疝修补模型中的组织结合和粘连特性。

研究设计

在 24 头尤卡坦小型猪中创建双侧腹壁缺损,共产生 48 个缺损,让其成熟 21 天。12 个缺损采用经腹前壁技术使用有孔 CPDM 修复,12 个缺损采用经腹腔技术使用有孔 CPDM 修复,12 个缺损采用经腹前壁技术使用无孔 CPDM 修复,12 个缺损采用经腹腔技术使用无孔 CPDM 修复。腹腔组中的一半动物在 1 个月后处死,另一半在 3 个月后处死。同样,经腹前壁组中的一半动物在 1 个月后处死,另一半在 6 个月后处死。进行生物力学测试和组织学评估。

结果

CPDM 产品经腹腔内放置与经腹前壁放置相比,粘连面积显著增大(p < 0.05)。经腹前壁放置的有孔和无孔 CPDM 的组织内生长在 6 个月时与 1 个月时相比,结合强度显著增大(p = 0.03 和 p < 0.0001)。组织学分析显示,与所有其他评估部位(包括无孔移植物)相比,穿过孔中心的细胞浸润、细胞外基质沉积和新生血管形成显著增加,纤维包裹明显减少。

结论

组织学研究发现,与无孔移植物相比,有孔部位的组织结合增强,无论植入物位置或体内时间如何。然而,与经腹腔内放置相比,经腹前壁放置无论是有孔还是无孔 CPDM,都具有更大的结合强度、更小的粘连面积和更低的粘连评分。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Use of human acellular dermal matrix for hernia repair: friend or foe?人脱细胞真皮基质在疝修补术中的应用:是福是祸?
Surgery. 2008 Oct;144(4):703-9; discussion 709-11. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.018. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
5
Xenograft use in reconstructive pelvic surgery: a review of the literature.异种移植在骨盆重建手术中的应用:文献综述
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 May;18(5):555-63. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0288-2. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
7
Decellularization of tissues and organs.组织和器官的去细胞化
Biomaterials. 2006 Jul;27(19):3675-83. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014. Epub 2006 Mar 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验