• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所禁烟与提高烟草税对荷兰人群吸烟行为的影响。

Effects of a workplace-smoking ban in combination with tax increases on smoking in the Dutch population.

机构信息

Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, PO Box 2168, 5600 CD Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 Jun;13(6):412-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr014. Epub 2011 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntr014
PMID:21357728
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the Netherlands, between 2003 and 2005, 3 tobacco control measures were implemented: a workplace-smoking ban and 2 tax increases on tobacco products. This study explores how the combination of measures influences the smoking behavior of the general population divided into subpopulations with and without paid work (all aged 16-65 years).

METHODS

Data from the Dutch Continuous Survey of Smoking Habits were used. The total sample consisted of 32,014 respondents (27,150 with paid work and 4,864 without paid work) aged 16-65 years. Analyses were done by linear and logistic regression, controlling for relevant factors.

RESULTS

For respondents with paid work, the combination of a smoking ban and 2 tax increases led to a decrease in the number of cigarettes per day and in the prevalence of daily smoking. For respondents without paid work, there was no significant effect on any of the outcome parameters. In both groups, there was no evidence that the effect of the measures on smoking was moderated by the respondent's gender, age, or level of education.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of policy measures has influenced the smoking behavior of respondents with paid work in a positive way. Compared with most other studies, the effect of the workplace-smoking ban alone is smaller. However, the effect of the combined interventions is higher than the that of tax increases in other studies. Among respondents without paid work who were exposed to tax increases only, no significant effects were found.

摘要

简介

在荷兰,2003 年至 2005 年期间实施了 3 项烟草控制措施:工作场所禁烟和 2 项烟草产品税提高。本研究探讨了这些措施的组合如何影响分为有薪工作和无薪工作人群(所有年龄在 16-65 岁之间)的一般人群的吸烟行为。

方法

使用荷兰连续吸烟习惯调查的数据。总样本由 32014 名受访者(有薪工作 27150 人,无薪工作 4864 人)组成,年龄在 16-65 岁之间。通过线性和逻辑回归进行分析,控制了相关因素。

结果

对于有薪工作的受访者,禁烟和 2 项税收增加的组合导致每天吸烟量和每日吸烟率下降。对于无薪工作的受访者,任何结果参数均无显著影响。在这两个群体中,没有证据表明措施对吸烟的影响受到受访者性别、年龄或教育程度的调节。

结论

政策措施的组合以积极的方式影响了有薪工作受访者的吸烟行为。与大多数其他研究相比,单独实施工作场所禁烟措施的效果较小。然而,联合干预的效果高于其他研究中税收增加的效果。在仅接触税收增加的无薪工作受访者中,未发现显著影响。

相似文献

1
Effects of a workplace-smoking ban in combination with tax increases on smoking in the Dutch population.工作场所禁烟与提高烟草税对荷兰人群吸烟行为的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 Jun;13(6):412-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr014. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
2
The population impact of smoke-free workplace and hospitality industry legislation on smoking behaviour. Findings from a national population survey.无烟工作场所和酒店业立法对吸烟行为的人口影响。全国人口调查的结果。
Addiction. 2011 Apr;106(4):816-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03247.x. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
3
Workplace smoking ban policy and smoking behavior.工作场所禁烟政策与吸烟行为。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2009 Sep;42(5):293-7. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.5.293.
4
Did the Tobacco Control Act Amendment in 1995 affect daily smoking in Finland? Effects of a restrictive workplace smoking policy.1995年的《烟草控制法案修正案》对芬兰的日常吸烟情况有影响吗?一项限制性工作场所吸烟政策的效果。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2008 Dec;30(4):407-14. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdm051. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
5
Characteristics of smoker support for increasing a dedicated tobacco tax: national survey data from New Zealand.支持提高专用烟草税的吸烟者特征:来自新西兰的全国调查数据。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Feb;12(2):168-73. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp178. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
6
Employees' job satisfaction after the introduction of a total smoke-ban in bars and restaurants in Norway.挪威酒吧和餐厅全面禁烟后员工的工作满意度
Health Promot Int. 2008 Dec;23(4):302-10. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan028. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
7
Analysing the Spanish smoke-free legislation of 2006: a new method to quantify its impact using a dynamic model.分析 2006 年西班牙的无烟立法:使用动态模型定量评估其影响的新方法。
Int J Drug Policy. 2011 Jul;22(4):247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
8
Five in a row--reactions of smokers to tobacco tax increases: population-based cross-sectional studies in Germany 2001-2006.连续五次——吸烟者对烟草税增加的反应:2001 - 2006年德国基于人群的横断面研究
Tob Control. 2007 Feb;16(1):34-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.017236.
9
The effect of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. Findings from the Netherlands SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Simulation Model.烟草控制政策对吸烟流行率和归因于吸烟的死亡人数的影响。来自荷兰 SimSmoke 烟草控制政策模拟模型的研究结果。
Addiction. 2012 Feb;107(2):407-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03642.x. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
10
Association of state tobacco control policies with active smoking at the time of intervention for intermittent claudication.州级烟草控制政策与间歇性跛行干预时的主动吸烟之间的关联。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1759-1768.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.156. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.一项关于解决吸烟行为的人群层面干预措施的系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Dec;8(12):2367-2391. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
2
Self-control, future orientation, smoking, and the impact of Dutch tobacco control measures.自我控制、未来导向、吸烟与荷兰烟草控制措施的影响
Addict Behav Rep. 2015 Jul 29;1:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.07.002. eCollection 2015 Jun.
3
Promoting physical activity in the workplace: A systematic meta-review.
促进职场中的身体活动:一项系统的元综述。
J Occup Health. 2017 Sep 28;59(5):385-393. doi: 10.1539/joh.16-0245-RA. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
4
Impact of tobacco control interventions on smoking initiation, cessation, and prevalence: a systematic review.烟草控制干预措施对吸烟起始、戒烟和流行率的影响:系统评价。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:961724. doi: 10.1155/2012/961724. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
5
Interventions to increase smoking cessation at the population level: how much progress has been made in the last two decades?在人群中提高戒烟率的干预措施:过去二十年取得了多大进展?
Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):110-8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050371.