确定学龄前儿童对决策机会的偏好：任务选择与结果选择。
Determining preschoolers' preferences for choice-making opportunities: choice of task versus choice of consequence.
机构信息
Department of Psychology, 236 Audubon Hall, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):503-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-503.
Abstract
Individuals may prefer contexts with the option to choose between 2 reinforcing stimuli or between 2 tasks relative to contexts in which others select the same events. We evaluated children's preferences for conditions characterized by (a) the opportunity to choose between tasks and (b) the opportunity to choose between putative reinforcers delivered following the completion of a task relative to no-choice and no-reinforcement control conditions. Three of 4 participants preferred the consequence-choice condition; the task-choice condition was no more preferred than the no-choice condition in any case.
摘要
个体可能更喜欢有选择两种强化刺激或两种任务的情境，而不是其他人选择相同事件的情境。我们评估了儿童对以下条件的偏好：（a）在任务之间选择的机会，和（b）在完成任务后获得假设强化物的机会，相对于无选择和无强化控制条件。四个参与者中有三个更喜欢结果选择条件；在任何情况下，任务选择条件都不比无选择条件更受欢迎。
相似文献
1
Determining preschoolers' preferences for choice-making opportunities: choice of task versus choice of consequence.确定学龄前儿童对决策机会的偏好：任务选择与结果选择。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):503-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-503.
2
Shifting preferences for choice-making opportunities through histories of differential reinforcer quality.通过不同强化质量的历史来改变选择机会的偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Feb;52(1):227-239. doi: 10.1002/jaba.515. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
3
On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.关于选择和差别性后果的相对强化作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):423-38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423.
4
Examining the generality of children's preference for contingent reinforcement via extension to different responses, reinforcers, and schedules.通过将强化物、反应和强化时间表扩展到不同的情况，考察儿童对偶然强化的偏好的普遍性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):397-409. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-397.
5
A further analysis of the value of choice: controlling for illusory discriminative stimuli and evaluating the effects of less preferred items.进一步分析选择的价值：控制虚幻的辨别刺激并评估较不受欢迎项目的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):711-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-711.
6
An evaluation of synchronous reinforcement for increasing on-task behavior in preschool children.评价同步强化对提高学龄前儿童课堂行为的作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1660-1673. doi: 10.1002/jaba.696. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
Preference for and reinforcing efficacy of different types of attention in preschool children.学龄前儿童对不同类型注意力的偏好及强化效果
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Jun;54(3):882-902. doi: 10.1002/jaba.814. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
An evaluation of the value of choice with preschool children.对学龄前儿童选择价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Spring;39(1):1-16. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.158-04.
9
Effects of choice of stimuli as reinforcement for task responding in reinforcement for task responding in preschoolers with and without developmental disabilities.在有和没有发育障碍的学龄前儿童中，选择刺激作为任务反应强化物对任务反应强化的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):93-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-93.
10
The effects of reinforcer pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections.强化物配对与消退对学龄前儿童零食选择的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):633-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.633-644.
引用本文的文献
1
Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices.选择与无选择：增加选择的实际考量
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Jan;58(1):100-117. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2920. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
本文引用的文献
1
An evaluation of the relative efficacy of and children's preferences for teaching strategies that differ in amount of teacher directedness.对教师指导程度不同的教学策略的相对有效性以及儿童对这些策略的偏好进行评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):123-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-123.
2
Effects of choice and immediacy of reinforcement on single response and switching behavior of children.选择和即时强化对儿童单一反应和转换行为的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 May;19(3):425-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-425.
3
An evaluation of the value of choice with preschool children.对学龄前儿童选择价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Spring;39(1):1-16. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.158-04.
4
The influence of activity choice on problem behaviors maintained by escape versus attention.活动选择对因逃避或寻求关注而维持的问题行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Winter;35(4):349-62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-349.
5
Evaluating the reinforcing effects of choice in comparison to reinforcement rate.与强化率相比，评估选择的强化效果。
Res Dev Disabil. 1998 Mar-Apr;19(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(97)00050-4.
6
Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.评估客户对基于功能的治疗方案的偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):459-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459.
7
On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.关于选择和差别性后果的相对强化作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):423-38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423.
8
Effects of choosing academic assignments on a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.选择学术作业对患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的学生的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring;30(1):181-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-181.
9
Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges.做出选择以促进有情绪和行为障碍的学生的适应性行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):505-18. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-505.
10
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Zotero 插件