进一步分析选择的价值：控制虚幻的辨别刺激并评估较不受欢迎项目的影响。
A further analysis of the value of choice: controlling for illusory discriminative stimuli and evaluating the effects of less preferred items.
机构信息
University of Kansas, USA.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):711-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-711.
Abstract
We sought to address limitations of prior research that has isolated choice as an independent variable. Children's preferences for the opportunity to choose were evaluated in a concurrent-chains arrangement in which identical consequences were available in choice and no-choice conditions. Results demonstrated that preference for choice, in and of itself, was (a) evident in children, (b) not controlled by illusory discriminative stimuli such as the amount from which to choose, and (c) generally unaffected by less preferred and potentially unimportant consequences.
摘要
我们试图解决先前研究的局限性，即孤立选择作为一个自变量。在同时链安排中评估了儿童对选择机会的偏好，在选择和无选择条件下提供相同的后果。结果表明，选择本身的偏好，（a）在儿童中是明显的，（b）不受选择数量等虚幻的辨别刺激的控制，（c）通常不受不太受欢迎和可能不重要的后果的影响。
相似文献
1
A further analysis of the value of choice: controlling for illusory discriminative stimuli and evaluating the effects of less preferred items.进一步分析选择的价值：控制虚幻的辨别刺激并评估较不受欢迎项目的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):711-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-711.
2
An evaluation of the value of choice with preschool children.对学龄前儿童选择价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Spring;39(1):1-16. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.158-04.
3
The effects of reinforcer pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections.强化物配对与消退对学龄前儿童零食选择的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):633-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.633-644.
4
Determining preschoolers' preferences for choice-making opportunities: choice of task versus choice of consequence.确定学龄前儿童对决策机会的偏好：任务选择与结果选择。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):503-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-503.
5
Assessing the value of choice in a token system.评估代币系统中选择的价值。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):553-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-553.
6
Children's purchase behavior in the snack market: Can branding or lower prices motivate healthier choices?儿童在零食市场的购买行为：品牌塑造或降低价格能激励更健康的选择吗？
Appetite. 2017 Oct 1;117:247-254. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
7
Examining the generality of children's preference for contingent reinforcement via extension to different responses, reinforcers, and schedules.通过将强化物、反应和强化时间表扩展到不同的情况，考察儿童对偶然强化的偏好的普遍性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):397-409. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-397.
8
Effects of fast food branding on young children's taste preferences.快餐品牌对幼儿口味偏好的影响。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Aug;161(8):792-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.8.792.
9
Do children's food choices go with the crowd? Effects of majority and minority peer cues shown within an audiovisual cartoon on children's healthy food choice.儿童的食物选择是否随大流？在视听卡通片中展示的多数和少数同伴线索对儿童健康食物选择的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Mar;225:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
10
A preference analysis of reinforcer variation and choice.强化物变化与选择的偏好分析
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Jun;54(3):1062-1074. doi: 10.1002/jaba.835. Epub 2021 May 14.
引用本文的文献
1
Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices.选择与无选择：增加选择的实际考量
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Jan;58(1):100-117. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2920. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
They have a Voice; are we Listening?他们有发言权；我们在倾听吗？
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Apr 6;16(1):127-144. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00690-z. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Effects of differential reinforcement and rules with feedback on preference for choice and verbal reports.差别强化及带反馈规则对选择偏好和言语报告的影响。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2012;28(1):31-57. doi: 10.1007/BF03393106.
4
Toward effective and preferred programming: a case for the objective measurement of social validity with recipients of behavior-change programs.迈向有效且受欢迎的项目规划：行为改变项目接受者对社会效度进行客观测量的实例分析
Behav Anal Pract. 2010 Spring;3(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03391754.
5
Effects of a history of differential reinforcement on preference for choice.历史差异强化对选择偏好的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Mar;95(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-189.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluating preschool children's preferences for motivational systems during instruction.评估学龄前儿童在教学过程中对激励系统的偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer;40(2):249-61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.59-05.
2
Effects of choice and immediacy of reinforcement on single response and switching behavior of children.选择和即时强化对儿童单一反应和转换行为的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 May;19(3):425-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-425.
3
An evaluation of the value of choice with preschool children.对学龄前儿童选择价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Spring;39(1):1-16. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.158-04.
4
The influence of activity choice on problem behaviors maintained by escape versus attention.活动选择对因逃避或寻求关注而维持的问题行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Winter;35(4):349-62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-349.
5
Evaluating the reinforcing effects of choice in comparison to reinforcement rate.与强化率相比，评估选择的强化效果。
Res Dev Disabil. 1998 Mar-Apr;19(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(97)00050-4.
6
Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.评估客户对基于功能的治疗方案的偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):459-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459.
7
On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.关于选择和差别性后果的相对强化作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):423-38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423.
8
Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges.做出选择以促进有情绪和行为障碍的学生的适应性行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):505-18. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-505.
9
Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps.选择行为对重度残疾学生严重问题行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Winter;23(4):515-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-515.
10
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Zotero 插件