• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与强化率相比,评估选择的强化效果。

Evaluating the reinforcing effects of choice in comparison to reinforcement rate.

作者信息

Thompson R H, Fisher W W, Contrucci S A

机构信息

Neurobehavioral Unit, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 1998 Mar-Apr;19(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(97)00050-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0891-4222(97)00050-4
PMID:9547528
Abstract

A concurrent-operants arrangement was used to evaluate a boy's preference for a choice condition (in which he chose the reinforcement) over a no-choice condition (in which the therapist selected the reinforcement for him) when (a) these conditions produced equal rates of reinforcement and (b) lower rates of reinforcement were associated with the choice condition. The boy preferred the choice condition even when it resulted in a much less favorable rate of reinforcement than the no-choice condition (up to 4000% less).

摘要

采用并发操作安排来评估一个男孩在以下两种情况下,对有选择条件(他自己选择强化物)相对于无选择条件(治疗师为他选择强化物)的偏好:(a) 这两种条件产生相同的强化频率;(b) 有选择条件下的强化频率较低。即使当有选择条件导致的强化频率比无选择条件低得多(高达少4000%)时,这个男孩仍然更喜欢有选择条件。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the reinforcing effects of choice in comparison to reinforcement rate.与强化率相比,评估选择的强化效果。
Res Dev Disabil. 1998 Mar-Apr;19(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(97)00050-4.
2
The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes.强化物偏好对功能分析结果的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Spring;31(1):79-90. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-79.
3
Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.进一步研究影响对正强化与负强化偏好的因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):25-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05.
4
Assessment of a response bias for aggression over functionally equivalent appropriate behavior.对功能等效的适当行为中攻击反应偏差的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):73-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-73.
5
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.使用选择评估来预测强化物的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):1-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1.
6
Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.评估客户对基于功能的治疗方案的偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):459-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459.
7
On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.关于选择和差别性后果的相对强化作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):423-38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423.
8
Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy.强化强度:偏好与强化物效能的评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):203-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-203.
9
Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.相对与绝对强化效应:对偏好评估的影响
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):479-93. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-479.
10
Efficacy of and preference for reinforcement and response cost in token economies.代币制经济中强化与反应代价的效果及偏好
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Jun;49(2):329-45. doi: 10.1002/jaba.294. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A practitioner's guide to emphasizing choice-making opportunities in behavioral services provided to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.为智力和发育障碍人士提供行为服务时强调选择机会的从业者指南。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2023 Feb 1;69(1):101-110. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2117911. eCollection 2023.
2
Minimizing Escalation by Treating Dangerous Problem Behavior Within an Enhanced Choice Model.在强化选择模型中通过处理危险问题行为来尽量减少行为升级。
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 28;15(1):219-242. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00548-2. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Effects of differential reinforcement and rules with feedback on preference for choice and verbal reports.
差别强化及带反馈规则对选择偏好和言语报告的影响。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2012;28(1):31-57. doi: 10.1007/BF03393106.
4
Toward effective and preferred programming: a case for the objective measurement of social validity with recipients of behavior-change programs.迈向有效且受欢迎的项目规划:行为改变项目接受者对社会效度进行客观测量的实例分析
Behav Anal Pract. 2010 Spring;3(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03391754.
5
An evaluation of the value of choice-making opportunities in single-operant arrangements: simple fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules.对单操作安排中选择机会价值的评估:简单固定比率和累进比率方案。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):519-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-519.
6
Determining preschoolers' preferences for choice-making opportunities: choice of task versus choice of consequence.确定学龄前儿童对决策机会的偏好:任务选择与结果选择。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):503-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-503.
7
A further analysis of the value of choice: controlling for illusory discriminative stimuli and evaluating the effects of less preferred items.进一步分析选择的价值:控制虚幻的辨别刺激并评估较不受欢迎项目的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):711-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-711.
8
An evaluation of the value of choice with preschool children.对学龄前儿童选择价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Spring;39(1):1-16. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.158-04.