Suppr超能文献

培训有强迫症症状的个体的解释偏差。

Training interpretation biases among individuals with symptoms of obsessive compulsive disorder.

机构信息

The Center for Alcohol & Addiction Studies, Brown University, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;42(3):337-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 12.

Abstract

The current study tested the causal premise underlying cognitive models of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) that negative interpretations of intrusive thoughts lead to the distress and impairment associated with symptoms of OCD. Specifically, we sought to determine: (a) whether it was possible to train healthier (defined as more benign/less threatening) interpretations regarding the significance of intrusive thoughts; and (b) whether there was a link between modifying negative interpretations and subsequent emotional vulnerability to an OC stressor. A nonclinical sample of students high in OC symptoms completed either a Positive (n = 50) or Neutral (n = 50) interpretation training procedure designed to alter OC-relevant interpretations and beliefs. As expected, participants in the Positive (versus Neutral) training condition endorsed healthier OC-relevant interpretations and beliefs following training. Additionally, when controlling for baseline affect, participants in the Positive (versus Neutral) training condition reported less negative affect during the OC-stressor task (at the level of a non-significant trend) and reported less desire to perform neutralizing activities. In general, results provide some support for cognitive models of obsessions and suggest that negative interpretations of intrusive thoughts may be causally related to symptoms of OCD.

摘要

本研究旨在检验强迫症(OCD)认知模型的一个因果前提,即对侵入性思维的负面解读会导致与 OCD 症状相关的痛苦和障碍。具体而言,我们试图确定:(a) 是否有可能对侵入性思维的意义进行更健康(定义为更良性/威胁性较小)的解读;以及 (b) 改变负面解读与随后对 OC 应激源的情绪脆弱性之间是否存在关联。一组 OC 症状较高的非临床学生样本完成了积极(n=50)或中性(n=50)的解释训练程序,旨在改变与 OC 相关的解释和信念。正如预期的那样,与中性训练条件相比,积极训练条件下的参与者在训练后更倾向于接受更健康的 OC 相关解释和信念。此外,在控制基线情绪的情况下,与中性训练条件相比,积极训练条件下的参与者在 OC 应激任务期间报告的负面情绪较少(存在非显著趋势),并报告较少进行中性化活动的欲望。总的来说,研究结果为强迫症的认知模型提供了一些支持,并表明对侵入性思维的负面解读可能与 OCD 症状存在因果关系。

相似文献

1
Training interpretation biases among individuals with symptoms of obsessive compulsive disorder.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;42(3):337-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
2
Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) of obsessive compulsive beliefs.
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 9;13:256. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-256.
3
Obsessive-compulsive symptoms: the contribution of obsessional beliefs and experiential avoidance.
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Mar;23(2):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
4
Treating adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder: applications of the cognitive theory.
Behav Res Ther. 1998 Jan;36(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00074-0.
5
The appraisal of intrusive thoughts in relation to obsessional-compulsive symptoms.
Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(2):98-110. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2010.545072. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
6
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an augmentation treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Sep;24(5):1109-1120. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2076. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
7
Experimental modification of dysfunctional interpretations in individuals with contamination concerns.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;59:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Appraisals of obsessional thoughts in normal samples.
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Jan;46(1):71-83. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.10.007. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
10
A novel approach to challenging OCD related beliefs using a mobile-app: An exploratory study.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;59:157-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

2
A Weakly Supervised Learning Framework for Detecting Social Anxiety and Depression.
Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2018 Jun;2(2). doi: 10.1145/3214284.
4
5
Evaluating Change in Beliefs About the Importance/Control of Thoughts as a Mediator of CBM-I and Responses to an ICT Stressor.
J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2014 Oct 1;3(4):311-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.07.002.
6
How to boost positive interpretations? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification for interpretation.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 26;9(6):e100925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100925. eCollection 2014.
8
Reaching new heights: comparing interpretation bias modification to exposure therapy for extreme height fear.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Jun;82(3):404-17. doi: 10.1037/a0036023. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
9
Interpretation of Ambiguity in Individuals with Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms.
Cognit Ther Res. 2013 Apr;37(2). doi: 10.1007/s10608-012-9478-z.
10
Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) of obsessive compulsive beliefs.
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 9;13:256. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-256.

本文引用的文献

1
Modifying interpretations among individuals high in anxiety sensitivity.
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Jan;24(1):71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.08.008.
2
A multi-session interpretation modification program: changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms.
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Oct;46(10):1135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.012. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
3
Facilitating a benign interpretation bias in a high socially anxious population.
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jul;45(7):1517-29. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.01.007. Epub 2007 Feb 4.
5
The cognitive mediation of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: a longitudinal study.
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(1):91-104. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.05.003. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
6
The role of cognitive factors in the pathogenesis of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: a prospective study.
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Sep;44(9):1361-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.09.011. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
8
Implicit and explicit appraisals of the importance of intrusive thoughts.
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jun;44(6):785-805. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
10
Exposure and ritual prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: effects of intensive versus twice-weekly sessions.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Apr;71(2):394-8. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.2.394.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验