Wilkinson P C
Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, University of Glasgow (Western Infirmary), U.K.
Immunology. 1990 Jan;69(1):127-33.
Experiments were designed to discover whether locomotor or chemotactic events are needed for clustering of lymphocytes with accessory cells or, conversely, whether clustering precedes the activation of lymphocyte locomotion. The time-courses of clustering and locomotor activation were compared and the behaviour of moving cells during cluster formation was filmed. Human lymphocytes direct from blood were activated by culture for 24-48 hr with anti-CD3 antibody or in allogeneic mixed leucocyte reactions (AMLR). The proportion of clustered and locomotor lymphocytes was low at the beginning of culture. Clusters appeared during the first few hours, before the increase in numbers of locomotor lymphocytes. Filming gave no evidence that the cells attracted one another chemotactically to form clusters. Rather, cells made chance contact by random locomotion and then remained adherent, though lymphocytes very close (less than or equal to 10 microns) to clusters did show increased pseudopod formation towards the cluster. However, the behaviour of motile lymphocytes responding to monocytes or macrophages given a phagocytic stimulus was different. Human monocytes which ingested opsonized zymosan released a material during but not following phagocytosis which caused an immediate increase in polar shape-change in lymphocytes. Macrophages from Corynebacterium parvum-induced mouse peritoneal exudates, given a phagocytic stimulus (opsonized Candida albicans), acted as sources of chemotactic gradients which attracted nearby lymphocytes to form clusters. This was due to brief release of a material immediately following phagocytosis, but after 15 min or so the macrophages no longer attracted nearby cells. These experiments suggest that, during induction of an immune response to a non-phagocytic stimulus, clusters form slowly by random contact followed by preferential adhesion. However, after phagocytosis, there may be a chemotactic response to the ingesting macrophage. This may help to focus lymphocytes onto macrophages which present microbial antigens.
实验旨在探究淋巴细胞与辅助细胞聚集是否需要运动或趋化事件,或者相反,聚集是否先于淋巴细胞运动的激活。比较了聚集和运动激活的时间进程,并拍摄了聚集形成过程中移动细胞的行为。直接从血液中获取的人淋巴细胞通过用抗CD3抗体培养24 - 48小时或在同种异体混合淋巴细胞反应(AMLR)中被激活。培养开始时,聚集和运动的淋巴细胞比例较低。在最初的几个小时内出现聚集,早于运动淋巴细胞数量的增加。拍摄结果没有显示细胞通过趋化作用相互吸引形成聚集。相反,细胞通过随机运动偶然接触,然后保持黏附,尽管非常靠近(小于或等于10微米)聚集物的淋巴细胞确实显示出朝向聚集物的伪足形成增加。然而,对受到吞噬刺激的单核细胞或巨噬细胞做出反应的运动淋巴细胞的行为有所不同。摄取调理酵母聚糖的人单核细胞在吞噬过程中而非吞噬后释放一种物质,该物质导致淋巴细胞极性形态变化立即增加。来自微小棒状杆菌诱导的小鼠腹腔渗出液的巨噬细胞,在受到吞噬刺激(调理白色念珠菌)后,作为趋化梯度源吸引附近的淋巴细胞形成聚集。这是由于吞噬后立即短暂释放一种物质,但大约15分钟后巨噬细胞不再吸引附近的细胞。这些实验表明,在对非吞噬性刺激诱导免疫反应期间,聚集通过随机接触然后优先黏附缓慢形成。然而,吞噬后,可能对摄取的巨噬细胞有趋化反应。这可能有助于将淋巴细胞集中到呈递微生物抗原的巨噬细胞上。