King Susan, Chen Athena L, Joshi Anand, Serra Alessandro, Leigh R John
Department of Neurology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-5040, United States.
Vision Res. 2011 May 11;51(9):1064-74. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.019. Epub 2011 Mar 6.
Studying saccades can illuminate the more complex decision-making processes required for everyday movements. The double-step task, in which a target jumps to two successive locations before the subject has time to react, has proven a powerful research tool to investigate the brain's ability to program sequential responses. We asked how patients with a range of cerebellar disorders responded to the double-step task, specifically, whether the initial saccadic response made to a target is affected by the appearance of a second target jump. We also sought to determine whether cerebellar patients were able to make corrective saccades towards the remembered second target location if it were turned off soon after presentation. We tested saccades to randomly interleaved single- and double-step target jumps to eight locations on a circle. Patient's initial responses to double-step stimuli showed 50% more error than saccades to single target jumps, and often, they failed to make a saccade to the first target jump. The presence of a second target jump had similar, but smaller effects in control subjects (error increased by 18%). During memory-guided double-step trials, both patients and controls made corrective saccades in darkness to the remembered location of the second jump. We conclude that in cerebellar patients, the second target jump interferes with programming of the saccade to the first target jump of a double-step stimulus; this defect highlights patients' impaired ability to respond appropriately to sudden, conflicting changes in their environment. Conversely, since cerebellar patients can make corrective memory-guided saccades in darkness, they retain the ability to remember spatial locations, possibly due to non-retinal neural signals (corollary discharge) from cerebral hemispheric areas concerned with spatial localization.
研究眼跳可以阐明日常运动所需的更为复杂的决策过程。在双步任务中,目标在受试者有时间做出反应之前会跳到两个连续的位置,事实证明这是一种强大的研究工具,可用于研究大脑对顺序反应进行编程的能力。我们研究了一系列小脑疾病患者对双步任务的反应,具体而言,对目标做出的初始眼跳反应是否会受到第二个目标跳跃出现的影响。我们还试图确定,如果第二个目标在呈现后不久就消失,小脑疾病患者是否能够朝着记住的第二个目标位置进行纠正性眼跳。我们测试了对随机交错的单步和双步目标跳跃到圆上八个位置的眼跳。患者对双步刺激的初始反应比单目标跳跃的眼跳误差多50%,而且他们常常未能对第一个目标跳跃做出眼跳。在对照受试者中,第二个目标跳跃的存在有类似但较小的影响(误差增加了18%)。在记忆引导的双步试验中,患者和对照者在黑暗中都对记住的第二个跳跃位置进行了纠正性眼跳。我们得出结论,在小脑疾病患者中,第二个目标跳跃会干扰对双步刺激的第一个目标跳跃的眼跳编程;这一缺陷突出了患者对环境中突然出现的冲突变化做出适当反应的能力受损。相反,由于小脑疾病患者能够在黑暗中进行记忆引导的纠正性眼跳,他们保留了记住空间位置的能力,这可能是由于与空间定位有关的大脑半球区域发出的非视网膜神经信号(推论放电)。