• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩展研究者困扰的概念:编码的累积效应。

Expanding the notion of researcher distress: the cumulative effects of coding.

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2011 Jun;21(6):830-8. doi: 10.1177/1049732311402095. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1177/1049732311402095
PMID:21393618
Abstract

Qualitative researchers who explore the individual's experience of health, illness, death, and dying often experience emotional stress in their work. In this article, we describe the emotional stress we experienced while coding semistructured, after-death interviews conducted with 38 next of kin of deceased veterans. Coding sensitive topic data required an unexpected level of emotional labor, the impact of which has not been addressed in the literature. In writing this discussion article, we stepped back from our roles as interviewers/coders and reflected on how our work affected us individually and as a team, and how a sequence of exposures could exert a cumulative effect for researchers in such a dual role. Through this article, we hope to generate an expanded discourse on how qualitative inquiry impacts the emotional well-being of researchers.

摘要

从事健康、疾病、死亡和临终个体体验研究的定性研究人员在工作中常常会经历情绪压力。在本文中,我们描述了在对 38 名已故退伍军人的近亲进行半结构化死后访谈时所经历的情绪压力。对敏感主题数据进行编码需要进行意想不到的情感劳动,而文献中并未涉及这种影响。在撰写这篇讨论文章时,我们从访谈者/编码员的角色中退一步,反思我们的工作如何对我们个人和团队产生影响,以及一系列的经历如何对担任这种双重角色的研究人员产生累积影响。通过本文,我们希望引发关于定性研究如何影响研究人员的情感健康的更广泛讨论。

相似文献

1
Expanding the notion of researcher distress: the cumulative effects of coding.扩展研究者困扰的概念:编码的累积效应。
Qual Health Res. 2011 Jun;21(6):830-8. doi: 10.1177/1049732311402095. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
2
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
3
Compassion stress and the qualitative researcher.同情压力与质性研究者。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Mar;15(3):423-30. doi: 10.1177/1049732304272038.
4
Keeping nurse researchers safe: workplace health and safety issues.保障护士研究人员的安全:工作场所健康与安全问题。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jul;68(7):1538-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05942.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
5
"Researcher saturation": the impact of data triangulation and intensive-research practices on the researcher and qualitative research process.“研究者饱和”:数据三角互证与深度研究实践对研究者及质性研究过程的影响
Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1392-402. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308308.
6
Exploring painful experiences: impact of emotional narratives on members of a qualitative research team.探索痛苦经历:情感叙事对一个定性研究团队成员的影响
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Dec;56(6):607-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04039.x.
7
Reflexive journaling on emotional research topics: ethical issues for team researchers.关于情感研究主题的反思性日志记录:团队研究人员的伦理问题。
Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1329-39. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308948.
8
Being a qualitative researcher.作为一名定性研究者。
Qual Health Res. 2011 Jul;21(7):968-75. doi: 10.1177/1049732310395607. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
9
Identifying and responding to ethical and methodological issues in after-death interviews with next-of-kin.识别与应对在对近亲进行的死后访谈中的伦理和方法学问题。
Death Stud. 2008;32(3):197-236. doi: 10.1080/07481180701881297.
10
Using reflexivity to enhance in-depth interviewing skills for the clinician researcher.运用反身性提高临床研究人员的深入访谈技巧。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Nov 9;8:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Suicide risk assessment and management protocol for research within the Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部内部研究的自杀风险评估与管理协议
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Apr;134(3):217-227. doi: 10.1037/abn0000968. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Mutual Emotional Labor as Method: Building Connections of Care in Qualitative Research.作为方法的相互情感劳动:在定性研究中建立关怀联系
Qual Rep. 2023 Nov;28(11):3192-3212. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6251.
3
Lessons from insiders: Embracing subjectivity as objectivity in victimology.
内部人士的经验教训:在受害者研究中将主观性视为客观性。
Int Rev Vict. 2024 May;30(2):298-320. doi: 10.1177/02697580231179489. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
4
Getting "clean" from nonsuicidal self-injury: Experiences of addiction on the subreddit r/selfharm.从非自杀性自伤中“戒瘾”:Reddit 社区 r/selfharm 上的成瘾体验。
J Behav Addict. 2022 Mar 21;11(1):128-139. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00005. Print 2022 Mar 28.
5
Risk of Secondary Distress for Graduate Students Conducting Qualitative Research on Sensitive Subjects: A Scoping Review of Canadian Dissertations and Theses.对敏感主题进行定性研究的研究生的继发性困扰风险:加拿大博士论文和硕士论文的范围综述
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2021 Feb 12;8:2333393621993803. doi: 10.1177/2333393621993803. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
6
The emotional challenges of conducting in-depth research into significant health issues in health geography: reflections on emotional labour, fieldwork and life course.健康地理学中对重大健康问题进行深入研究的情感挑战:关于情感劳动、实地调查和生命历程的思考
Area (Oxf). 2017 Dec;49(4):436-442. doi: 10.1111/area.12347. Epub 2017 May 9.
7
Speaking from the Inside: Challenges Faced by Communication Researchers Investigating Disease-Related Issues in a Hospital Setting.从内部发声:在医院环境中研究疾病相关问题的传播研究者所面临的挑战。
J Med Humanit. 2015 Sep;36(3):251-5. doi: 10.1007/s10912-014-9325-1.