• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于生态系统服务付费的动物学视角。

A zoological perspective on payments for ecosystem services.

作者信息

McNeely Jeffrey A

机构信息

IUCN - The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.

出版信息

Integr Zool. 2007 Jun;2(2):68-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2007.00048.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1749-4877.2007.00048.x
PMID:21396021
Abstract

The concept of payments for ecosystem services is being developed as an important means of providing a more diverse flow of benefits to people living in and around habitats valuable for conservation. The Kyoto Protocol, under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, includes a Clean Development Mechanism to provide for payments for certain forms of carbon sequestration that may benefit animal species (at least as an incidental benefit). Other market-based approaches for paying for carbon sequestration services outside the Kyoto framework are being promoted in various parts of the world. Another common form of payment for ecosystem services is compensating upstream landowners for managing their land in ways that maintain downstream water quality; this can include habitat management that benefits wild animal species. While biodiversity itself is difficult to value, it can be linked to other markets, such as certification in the case of sustainably-produced forest products. This paper expands on some of the markets for ecosystem services that also benefit wildlife, identifies relevant sources of information, and highlights some of the initiatives linking such markets to poverty alleviation. Making markets work for ecosystem services requires an appropriate policy framework, government support, operational institutional support, and innovation at scales from the site level to the national level. Zoologists have much to contribute to all of these steps.

摘要

为生态系统服务付费的概念正在形成,这是一种为生活在对保护具有重要价值的栖息地及其周边的人们提供更多样化利益流的重要手段。《联合国气候变化框架公约》下的《京都议定书》包含一个清洁发展机制,为某些可能使动物物种受益(至少作为附带利益)的碳固存形式提供付费。世界各地区正在推广京都框架之外的其他基于市场的碳固存服务付费方式。另一种常见的生态系统服务付费形式是向上游土地所有者支付费用,以鼓励他们采用维持下游水质的方式管理土地;这可能包括有利于野生动物物种的栖息地管理。虽然生物多样性本身难以估值,但它可以与其他市场联系起来,比如可持续生产的林产品认证市场。本文详细阐述了一些也有利于野生动物的生态系统服务市场,确定了相关信息来源,并强调了一些将此类市场与减贫联系起来的举措。要让市场为生态系统服务发挥作用,需要一个适当的政策框架、政府支持、运作层面的机构支持以及从场地层面到国家层面的创新。动物学家在所有这些步骤中都能发挥很大作用。

相似文献

1
A zoological perspective on payments for ecosystem services.关于生态系统服务付费的动物学视角。
Integr Zool. 2007 Jun;2(2):68-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2007.00048.x.
2
The role of multilateral institutions.多边机构的作用。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1641-52. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1024.
3
Greenhouse-gas-trading markets.温室气体交易市场
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1889-900. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1038.
4
Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in northern Tanzania.以生态系统服务付费为框架的坦桑尼亚北部基于社区的自然保护。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Feb;24(1):78-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01393.x.
5
Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.设计具有成本效益的保护措施支付方式,以产生时空栖息地异质性。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Dec;21(6):1475-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00829.x.
6
Developing markets for forest environmental services: an opportunity for promoting equity while securing efficiency?发展森林环境服务市场:在确保效率的同时促进公平的机遇?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1817-25. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1034.
7
Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.淡水生物多样性:重要性、威胁、现状及保护挑战
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 May;81(2):163-82. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950. Epub 2005 Dec 12.
8
Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change.由移动生物提供的授粉及其他生态系统服务:土地利用变化影响的概念框架
Ecol Lett. 2007 Apr;10(4):299-314. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x.
9
Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services.利用具有成本效益的目标定位来提高生态系统服务付费中保护投资的效率。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Dec;24(6):1469-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01551.x.
10
Risk and markets for ecosystem services.生态系统服务的风险和市场。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Dec 15;45(24):10322-30. doi: 10.1021/es203201n. Epub 2011 Nov 17.