Department of Medicine, VA-Palo Alto Healthcare System, 3801 Miranda Ave, MC 111, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):771-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1663-3. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
Readmissions cause significant distress to patients and considerable financial costs. Identifying hospitalized patients at high risk for readmission is an important strategy in reducing readmissions. We aimed to evaluate how well physicians, case managers, and nurses can predict whether their older patients will be readmitted and to compare their predictions to a standardized risk tool (Probability of Repeat Admission, or P(ra)).
Patients aged ≥ 65 discharged from the general medical service at University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, a 550-bed tertiary care academic medical center, were eligible for enrollment over a 5-week period. At the time of discharge, the inpatient team members caring for each patient estimated the chance of unscheduled readmission within 30 days and predicted the reason for potential readmission. We also calculated the P(ra) for each patient. We identified readmissions through electronic medical record (EMR) review and phone calls with patients/caregivers. Discrimination was determined by creating ROC curves for each provider group and the P(ra).
One hundred sixty-four patients were eligible for enrollment. Of these patients, five died during the 30-day period post-discharge. Of the remaining 159 patients, 52 patients (32.7%) were readmitted. Mean readmission predictions for the physician providers were closest to the actual readmission rate, while case managers, nurses, and the P(ra) all overestimated readmissions. The ability to discriminate between readmissions and non-readmissions was poor for all provider groups and the P(ra) (AUC from 0.50 for case managers to 0.59 for interns, 0.56 for P(ra)). None of the provider groups predicted the reason for readmission with accuracy.
This study found (1) overall readmission rates were higher than previously reported, possibly because we employed a more thorough follow-up methodology, and (2) neither providers nor a published algorithm were able to accurately predict which patients were at highest risk of readmission. Amid increasing pressure to reduce readmission rates, hospitals do not have accurate predictive tools to guide their efforts.
再入院给患者带来了巨大的痛苦和巨大的经济成本。确定住院患者再入院的高风险是降低再入院率的重要策略。我们旨在评估医生、病例经理和护士预测其老年患者是否会再入院的能力,并将其预测与标准化风险工具(再入院概率,或 P(ra))进行比较。
在加利福尼亚大学旧金山医疗中心的普通医疗服务出院的年龄≥65 岁的患者,在 5 周的时间内有资格入组。在出院时,照顾每位患者的住院团队成员估计了 30 天内非计划性再入院的机会,并预测了潜在再入院的原因。我们还为每位患者计算了 P(ra)。我们通过电子病历(EMR)审查和与患者/照顾者的电话来确定再入院。通过为每个提供方群体和 P(ra)创建 ROC 曲线来确定辨别力。
有 164 名患者符合入组条件。在这些患者中,有 5 人在出院后 30 天内死亡。在剩下的 159 名患者中,有 52 名(32.7%)患者再入院。医生提供者的平均再入院预测最接近实际再入院率,而病例经理、护士和 P(ra)均高估了再入院率。所有提供方群体和 P(ra)的再入院和非再入院之间的辨别能力都很差(从病例经理的 AUC 为 0.50 到住院医师的 0.59,到 P(ra)的 0.56)。没有一个提供方群体能够准确预测再入院的原因。
本研究发现:(1)总体再入院率高于之前的报告,可能是因为我们采用了更彻底的随访方法;(2)提供者和已发表的算法都无法准确预测哪些患者再入院风险最高。在医院面临越来越大的降低再入院率的压力下,他们没有准确的预测工具来指导他们的努力。