Lucendo Alfredo J, Guagnozzi Danila
Alfredo J Lucendo, Danila Guagnozzi, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Tomelloso 13700, Ciudad Real, Spain.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Feb 16;3(2):23-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i2.23.
Since its introduction in 2001, capsule endoscopy (CE) has become the most important advance in the study of small bowel disease, including Crohn's disease (CD). This technique has been demonstrated to be superior to all other current forms of radiological investigation in detecting mucosal abnormalities of small bowel nonstricturing CD. CE has proven to be extremely useful in diagnosing CD in patients with inconclusive findings from ileocolonoscopy and x-ray-based studies. Almost half of all patients with CD involving the ileum also present lesions in proximal intestinal segments, with the small bowel being exclusively involved in up to 30% of all CD cases. Despite the widespread use of CE, several questions concerning the utility of this technique remain unanswered. The lack of commonly agreed diagnostic criteria for defining CD lesions with the aid of CE may have had an influence on the variation in diagnostic results for CE reported in the literature. The utility of CE in monitoring CD and in guiding therapy has also been proposed. Furthermore, CE could be a useful second-line technique for patients with an established diagnosis of CD and unexplained symptoms. Finally, as no threshold for CD diagnosis has been agreed upon, a severity scale of mucosal disease activity has not been universally followed. None of the available activity indexes based on CE findings has been independently validated. This article discusses several cutting-edge aspects of the usefulness of CE in CD 10 years after its introduction as a sensible method to study the small intestine.
自2001年问世以来,胶囊内镜检查(CE)已成为小肠疾病研究中最重要的进展,包括克罗恩病(CD)。在检测小肠非狭窄性CD的黏膜异常方面,该技术已被证明优于目前所有其他形式的放射学检查。对于回结肠镜检查和基于X线的检查结果不明确的患者,CE已被证明在诊断CD方面极为有用。几乎一半累及回肠的CD患者在近端肠段也有病变,在所有CD病例中,仅小肠受累的情况高达30%。尽管CE已被广泛应用,但关于该技术的效用仍有几个问题未得到解答。缺乏借助CE定义CD病变的普遍认可的诊断标准,可能对文献中报道的CE诊断结果的差异产生了影响。CE在监测CD和指导治疗方面的效用也已被提出。此外,对于已确诊CD且有不明原因症状的患者,CE可能是一种有用的二线技术。最后,由于尚未就CD诊断的阈值达成共识,黏膜疾病活动度的严重程度分级也未得到普遍遵循。基于CE检查结果的现有活动指数均未得到独立验证。本文讨论了CE作为研究小肠明智方法引入10年后,其在CD中效用的几个前沿方面。