Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jul;469(7):1813-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1862-6.
In its 2002 publication Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, the Institute of Medicine reported American racial and ethnic minorities receive lower-quality health care than white Americans. Because caregiver bias may contribute to disparate health care, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education have issued specific directives to address culturally competent care education.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We discuss the general approaches to culturally competent care education, the tools used in evaluating such endeavors, and the impact of such endeavors on caregivers and/or the outcomes of therapeutic interventions from three perspectives: (1) Where are we now? (2) Where do we need to go? (3) How do we get there?
We summarized information from (1) articles identified in a PubMed search of relevant terms and (2) the authors' experience in delivering, evaluating, and promoting culturally competent care education. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: Considerable variation exists in approaches to culturally competent care education; specific guidelines and valid evaluation methods are lacking; and while existing education programs may promote changes in providers' knowledge and attitudes, there is little empirical evidence that such efforts reduce indicators of disparate care. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: We must develop evidence-based educational strategies that produce changes in caregiver attitudes and behaviors and, ultimately, reduction in healthcare disparities. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: We must have ongoing dialog about, development in, and focused research on specific educational and evaluation methodologies, while simultaneously addressing the economic, political, practical, and social barriers to the delivery of culturally competent care education.
2002 年,美国医学研究所(Institute of Medicine)发布了《不平等的待遇:正视医疗保健中的种族和民族差异》(Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care)一文,文中指出美国的少数族裔所接受的医疗服务质量不如美国白人。由于医护人员的偏见可能导致医疗服务的差异,因此,医学教育联络委员会(Liaison Committee on Medical Education)和研究生医学教育认证委员会(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education)已经发布了具体指令,以解决文化能力护理教育问题。
问题/目的:我们从三个角度讨论了文化能力护理教育的一般方法、评估这些努力的工具,以及这些努力对护理人员和/或治疗干预结果的影响:(1)我们现在在哪里?(2)我们需要去哪里?(3)我们如何到达那里?
我们总结了以下信息:(1)通过在 PubMed 上搜索相关术语,找到的文章;(2)作者在提供、评估和推广文化能力护理教育方面的经验。我们现在在哪里?:文化能力护理教育方法存在很大差异;缺乏具体的指导方针和有效的评估方法;虽然现有的教育计划可能会促进提供者知识和态度的改变,但几乎没有证据表明这些努力可以减少医疗服务差异的指标。我们需要去哪里?:我们必须制定基于证据的教育策略,以改变护理人员的态度和行为,并最终减少医疗保健差异。我们如何到达那里?:我们必须就具体的教育和评估方法进行持续的对话、发展和集中研究,同时解决提供文化能力护理教育的经济、政治、实际和社会障碍。