Institute for Psychology, University of Bern, Muesmattstrasse 45, 3000, Bern 9, Switzerland.
Psychol Res. 2012 Jan;76(1):20-31. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0333-8. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
The present study investigated modality-specific differences in processing of temporal information in the subsecond range. For this purpose, participants performed auditory and visual versions of a rhythm perception and three different duration discrimination tasks to allow for a direct, systematic comparison across both sensory modalities. Our findings clearly indicate higher temporal sensitivity in the auditory than in the visual domain irrespective of type of timing task. To further evaluate whether there is evidence for a common modality-independent timing mechanism or for multiple modality-specific mechanisms, we used structural equation modeling to test three different theoretical models. Neither a single modality-independent timing mechanism, nor two independent modality-specific timing mechanisms fitted the empirical data. Rather, the data are well described by a hierarchical model with modality-specific visual and auditory temporal processing at a first level and a modality-independent processing system at a second level of the hierarchy.
本研究旨在探究亚秒级时间信息处理在感觉模态特异性上的差异。为此,参与者完成了听觉和视觉的节奏感知以及三种不同的时长辨别任务,以便在两种感觉模态之间进行直接、系统的比较。我们的研究结果清楚地表明,无论计时任务的类型如何,听觉的时间敏感性都高于视觉。为了进一步评估是否存在通用的、与模态无关的计时机制或多个特定于模态的机制的证据,我们使用结构方程模型来测试三种不同的理论模型。既没有单一的、与模态无关的计时机制,也没有两个独立的、特定于模态的计时机制能够拟合经验数据。相反,数据很好地符合了一个层次模型,该模型在第一层具有特定于模态的视觉和听觉时间处理,在第二层具有与模态无关的处理系统。