Suppr超能文献

方法停止者和转换者有何区别?洪都拉斯妇女的避孕措施中断和转换。

What differentiates method stoppers from switchers? Contraceptive discontinuation and switching among Honduran women.

机构信息

MEASURE Evaluation Population & Reproductive Health, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Mar;37(1):16-23. doi: 10.1363/3701611.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Contraceptive discontinuation contributes to unplanned pregnancy and unwanted births, as well as increased maternal, neonatal and infant morbidity and mortality. Information on differences between women who stop using contraceptives and those who switch to another method would be useful for programs aimed at preventing unplanned pregnancies and their consequences.

METHODS

Data come from two rounds of interviews with women aged 15-44 (800 interviewed at baseline and 671 reinterviewed one year later) who were new or continuing users of injectable or oral contraceptives or an IUD. Bivariate analysis examined associations between attitudes and behaviors of women who discontinued their baseline method and side effects they experienced. Multivariate logistic regression assessed differences between women who switched methods immediately or within one month of discontinuation and those who stopped contraceptive use for one month or more.

RESULTS

Of the 671 women who were reinterviewed, 41% (273) discontinued use of their baseline contraceptive method within the one-year follow-up; of those, 43% (117) switched to a new method, and 57% (156) stopped for one month or more. Seeking help with side effects from a health worker, urban residence, talking to a partner about the decision to discontinue, and new and recent method adoption were associated with increased odds of switching methods (odds ratios, 2.0-3.5).

CONCLUSION

Access to high-quality family planning services and encouraging discussion with partners and families before stopping contraceptive use is important for women who experience side effects from contraceptive methods and are at risk of discontinuation.

摘要

背景

避孕措施的中断会导致意外怀孕和非意愿性生育,以及增加产妇、新生儿和婴儿的发病率和死亡率。了解停止使用避孕药具的妇女和改用其他方法的妇女之间的差异,对于旨在预防意外怀孕及其后果的项目将是有用的。

方法

数据来自两轮对 15-44 岁的妇女(800 名在基线时接受采访,671 名在一年后重新接受采访)的采访,这些妇女是注射或口服避孕药或宫内节育器的新使用者或继续使用者。双变量分析检查了在停止使用基线方法的妇女的态度和行为与她们经历的副作用之间的关联。多变量逻辑回归评估了在停止避孕一个月或以上的妇女与立即或在停止使用基线方法一个月内改用新方法的妇女之间的差异。

结果

在重新接受采访的 671 名妇女中,41%(273 名)在一年的随访期间停止使用她们的基线避孕药具;其中,43%(117 名)改用了新方法,57%(156 名)停止使用一个月或以上。向卫生工作者寻求副作用的帮助、城市居住、与伴侣讨论停止避孕的决定、以及采用新的和最近的方法与增加改用方法的几率有关(比值比,2.0-3.5)。

结论

获得高质量的计划生育服务,并在妇女因避孕方法出现副作用而有停药风险之前鼓励与伴侣和家人进行讨论,这对她们很重要。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
The link between quality of care and contraceptive use.医疗质量与避孕药具使用之间的联系。
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003 Jun;29(2):76-83. doi: 10.1363/ifpp.29.076.03.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验