Food Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Jul;65(7):872-4. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.38. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
A range of stakeholders have been involved in the development and implementation of dietary guidelines (DG) across Europe. Seventy-seven semi-structured qualitative interviews explored stakeholders' beliefs of DG in six European countries/regions. A main theme, variation in the interpretation of the term dietary guideline, was identified using thematic analysis. Descriptions of DG varied across stakeholder groups and countries. Reference was made to both food-based and nutrient-based guidelines, including the terms food-based DG and food guides (for example, pyramids), nutrient recommendations, dietary recommendations, dietary reference values and guideline daily amounts. The terminology surrounding DG requires greater clarity. Until that time, stakeholders would benefit from increased awareness of potential misinterpretations and the implications of this on multi-stakeholder, multi-national policy development and implementation.
一系列利益相关者参与了欧洲各地饮食指南（DG）的制定和实施。在六个欧洲国家/地区进行了 77 次半结构化定性访谈，探讨了利益相关者对 DG 的看法。使用主题分析确定了一个主要主题，即术语饮食指南的解释存在差异。DG 的描述因利益相关者群体和国家而异。提到了基于食物和基于营养素的指南，包括术语基于食物的 DG 和食物指南（例如金字塔）、营养素建议、饮食建议、膳食参考值和指南日摄入量。DG 周围的术语需要更加明确。在此之前，利益相关者将受益于提高对潜在误解的认识，以及这对多利益相关者、多国政策制定和实施的影响。
