International Observatory on End of Life Care, School of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, UK.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Jul;15(3):204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
A rapid and comprehensive review to identify what is known and not known about the physical and practical problems faced by adult cancer survivors.
A systematic literature review process was used. This focused on published reviews to enable a fast but rigorous identification of both the gaps and well-researched areas within survivorship.
The search identified 5121 reviews, of which 42 were screened and 9 met the quality and inclusion criteria. The majority of papers focused on physical well being (n = 6) with the remaining papers focusing on practical well being (employment and finance). The quality of the reviews varied (ranging from weak to good). Gaps identified include sexual function, lower-limb lymphoedema, peripheral neuropathy, bladder and GI problems, hormonal sequelae, older cancer survivors, work impact of cancer and context-specific unmet supportive care needs. The review found a lack of standardised nomenclature for survivorship and methodological limitations.
Four main gaps in knowledge relating to the practical and physical problems associated with cancer survivorship have been identified. These are key symptoms, unmet supportive care needs, employment and older cancer survivors, and should be addressed by future research and systematic literature reviews. Work is also needed to address the nomenclature of survivorship and to improve the methodology of research into cancer survivors (including standardised measures, theoretical frameworks, longitudinal design, inclusion of older survivors and age-matched controls for comparison). The review highlighted the need for better research within the identified areas in order to improve the experiences of cancer survivors.
快速而全面地回顾,以确定成人癌症幸存者在身体和实际问题方面的已知和未知情况。
采用系统文献回顾的方法。这集中于已发表的综述,以便快速但严格地确定生存研究中的空白领域和研究充分的领域。
搜索确定了 5121 篇综述,其中 42 篇进行了筛选,9 篇符合质量和纳入标准。大多数论文侧重于身体健康(n=6),其余论文侧重于实际健康(就业和财务)。综述的质量参差不齐(从弱到好)。确定的差距包括性功能障碍、下肢淋巴水肿、周围神经病变、膀胱和胃肠道问题、激素后遗症、老年癌症幸存者、癌症对工作的影响和特定于情境的未满足的支持性护理需求。该综述发现,生存方面缺乏标准化的命名法和方法学上的限制。
确定了与癌症生存相关的实际和身体问题的四个主要知识差距。这些是关键症状、未满足的支持性护理需求、就业和老年癌症幸存者,应该通过未来的研究和系统文献综述来解决。还需要努力解决生存的命名法问题,并改进癌症幸存者研究的方法(包括标准化措施、理论框架、纵向设计、纳入老年幸存者和年龄匹配的对照组进行比较)。该综述强调了需要在确定的领域内进行更好的研究,以改善癌症幸存者的体验。