Suppr超能文献

开发一种新的定量气体渗透法,用于评估牙种植体-基台连接的密封性。

Development of a new quantitative gas permeability method for dental implant-abutment connection tightness assessment.

机构信息

Université Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Biomed Eng Online. 2011 Apr 14;10:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most dental implant systems are presently made of two pieces: the implant itself and the abutment. The connection tightness between those two pieces is a key point to prevent bacterial proliferation, tissue inflammation and bone loss. The leak has been previously estimated by microbial, color tracer and endotoxin percolation.

METHODS

A new nitrogen flow technique was developed for implant-abutment connection leakage measurement, adapted from a recent, sensitive, reproducible and quantitative method used to assess endodontic sealing.

RESULTS

The results show very significant differences between various sealing and screwing conditions. The remaining flow was lower after key screwing compared to hand screwing (p = 0.03) and remained different from the negative test (p = 0.0004). The method reproducibility was very good, with a coefficient of variation of 1.29%.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, the presented new gas flow method appears to be a simple and robust method to compare different implant systems. It allows successive measures without disconnecting the abutment from the implant and should in particular be used to assess the behavior of the connection before and after mechanical stress.

摘要

背景

目前大多数牙种植体系统由两部分组成:种植体本身和基台。这两部分之间的连接紧密程度是防止细菌增殖、组织炎症和骨丢失的关键。之前已经通过微生物、颜色示踪剂和内毒素渗滤法来估计泄漏。

方法

本研究从最近开发的一种灵敏、可重复和定量的方法中,开发出一种用于测量种植体-基台连接泄漏的新型氮气流技术,用于评估根管封闭。

结果

结果显示,各种密封和旋紧条件之间存在显著差异。与手动旋紧相比,关键旋紧后的剩余流量较低(p = 0.03),且与阴性测试不同(p = 0.0004)。该方法的重现性非常好,变异系数为 1.29%。

结论

因此,本研究提出的新型气体流量法似乎是一种比较不同种植体系统的简单而可靠的方法。它允许在不将基台从种植体上断开的情况下进行连续测量,特别应在机械应力前后用于评估连接的行为。

相似文献

2
[Comparison of leakage at the implant to abutment connection in several implants types using a gas flow method].
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2014 Apr;115(2):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.revsto.2013.09.003. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
3
A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):879-85.
6
A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Implant Dent. 2014 Apr;23(2):206-11. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000063.
7
Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Oct;106(4):266-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60128-5.
8
Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):750-60. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4785.
10
Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):495-502. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00167-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of reverse torque values of abutment screws with the application of oil-based and water-based antibacterial agents.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022 Fall;16(4):238-242. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.038. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
2
A review on the latest advancements in the non-invasive evaluation/monitoring of dental and trans-femoral implants.
Biomed Eng Lett. 2019 Aug 8;10(1):83-102. doi: 10.1007/s13534-019-00126-8. eCollection 2020 Feb.
3
Leakage evaluation of original and compatible implant-abutment connections: In vitro study using Rhodamine B.
J Dent Biomech. 2014 Aug 11;5:1758736014547143. doi: 10.1177/1758736014547143. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling colorant leakage techniques: application to endodontics.
Dent Mater. 2010 Sep;26(9):881-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
4
In vitro evaluation of the implant abutment connection sealing capability of different implant systems.
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Dec;35(12):917-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01886.x. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
5
Gas permeability: a new quantitative method to assess endodontic leakage.
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2008 Aug;53(4):181-4. doi: 10.1515/BMT.2008.030.
6
Wanted: a base of evidence.
J Endod. 2007 Dec;33(12):1401-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.09.004.
7
Bacterial plaque colonization around dental implant surfaces.
Implant Dent. 2006 Sep;15(3):298-304. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000226823.58425.19.
8
Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface.
J Dent Res. 2006 May;85(5):473-8. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500515.
10
In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):732-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验