• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种新的定量气体渗透法,用于评估牙种植体-基台连接的密封性。

Development of a new quantitative gas permeability method for dental implant-abutment connection tightness assessment.

机构信息

Université Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Biomed Eng Online. 2011 Apr 14;10:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-28.

DOI:10.1186/1475-925X-10-28
PMID:21492459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3094215/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most dental implant systems are presently made of two pieces: the implant itself and the abutment. The connection tightness between those two pieces is a key point to prevent bacterial proliferation, tissue inflammation and bone loss. The leak has been previously estimated by microbial, color tracer and endotoxin percolation.

METHODS

A new nitrogen flow technique was developed for implant-abutment connection leakage measurement, adapted from a recent, sensitive, reproducible and quantitative method used to assess endodontic sealing.

RESULTS

The results show very significant differences between various sealing and screwing conditions. The remaining flow was lower after key screwing compared to hand screwing (p = 0.03) and remained different from the negative test (p = 0.0004). The method reproducibility was very good, with a coefficient of variation of 1.29%.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, the presented new gas flow method appears to be a simple and robust method to compare different implant systems. It allows successive measures without disconnecting the abutment from the implant and should in particular be used to assess the behavior of the connection before and after mechanical stress.

摘要

背景

目前大多数牙种植体系统由两部分组成:种植体本身和基台。这两部分之间的连接紧密程度是防止细菌增殖、组织炎症和骨丢失的关键。之前已经通过微生物、颜色示踪剂和内毒素渗滤法来估计泄漏。

方法

本研究从最近开发的一种灵敏、可重复和定量的方法中,开发出一种用于测量种植体-基台连接泄漏的新型氮气流技术,用于评估根管封闭。

结果

结果显示,各种密封和旋紧条件之间存在显著差异。与手动旋紧相比,关键旋紧后的剩余流量较低(p = 0.03),且与阴性测试不同(p = 0.0004)。该方法的重现性非常好,变异系数为 1.29%。

结论

因此,本研究提出的新型气体流量法似乎是一种比较不同种植体系统的简单而可靠的方法。它允许在不将基台从种植体上断开的情况下进行连续测量,特别应在机械应力前后用于评估连接的行为。

相似文献

1
Development of a new quantitative gas permeability method for dental implant-abutment connection tightness assessment.开发一种新的定量气体渗透法,用于评估牙种植体-基台连接的密封性。
Biomed Eng Online. 2011 Apr 14;10:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-28.
2
[Comparison of leakage at the implant to abutment connection in several implants types using a gas flow method].
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2014 Apr;115(2):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.revsto.2013.09.003. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
3
A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.一种用于测量种植体-基台微间隙的分类系统。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):879-85.
4
Molecular leakage at implant-abutment connection--in vitro investigation of tightness of internal conical implant-abutment connections against endotoxin penetration.种植体-基台连接部位的分子渗漏——研究内锥形种植体-基台连接部位密封性防止内毒素渗透的体外试验
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0317-x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
5
Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jul-Aug;15(4):519-26.
6
A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections.一项比较外部和内部种植体-基台连接的应变片分析。
Implant Dent. 2014 Apr;23(2):206-11. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000063.
7
Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.外连接与内连接种植体-基台的光弹应力分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Oct;106(4):266-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60128-5.
8
Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.连接类型和种植体数量对下颌全牙弓修复生物力学行为的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):750-60. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4785.
9
Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface of conical connection with an internal octagon: an in vitro study using real-time PCR.种植体-基台界面锥形连接内八角细菌定植的体外研究:实时聚合酶链反应。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017 Apr-Jun;31(2 Suppl 1):163-168.
10
Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.带有分段式和非分段式基台的种植体-牙齿连接修复体的光弹性应力分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):495-502. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00167-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of reverse torque values of abutment screws with the application of oil-based and water-based antibacterial agents.使用油基和水基抗菌剂时基台螺钉反向扭矩值的比较。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022 Fall;16(4):238-242. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.038. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
2
A review on the latest advancements in the non-invasive evaluation/monitoring of dental and trans-femoral implants.关于牙科和经股动脉植入物非侵入性评估/监测的最新进展综述。
Biomed Eng Lett. 2019 Aug 8;10(1):83-102. doi: 10.1007/s13534-019-00126-8. eCollection 2020 Feb.
3
Leakage evaluation of original and compatible implant-abutment connections: In vitro study using Rhodamine B.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling colorant leakage techniques: application to endodontics.建模染料渗漏技术:在牙髓学中的应用。
Dent Mater. 2010 Sep;26(9):881-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
2
Molecular leakage at implant-abutment connection--in vitro investigation of tightness of internal conical implant-abutment connections against endotoxin penetration.种植体-基台连接部位的分子渗漏——研究内锥形种植体-基台连接部位密封性防止内毒素渗透的体外试验
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0317-x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
3
Use of checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization to evaluate the internal contamination of dental implants and comparison of bacterial leakage with cast or pre-machined abutments.
原装与兼容种植体-基台连接的渗漏评估:使用罗丹明B的体外研究
J Dent Biomech. 2014 Aug 11;5:1758736014547143. doi: 10.1177/1758736014547143. eCollection 2014.
4
In vitro evaluation of leakage at implant-abutment connection of three implant systems having the same prosthetic interface using rhodamine B.使用罗丹明B对具有相同修复界面的三种种植系统的种植体-基台连接部位进行体外渗漏评估。
Int J Dent. 2014;2014:351263. doi: 10.1155/2014/351263. Epub 2014 May 11.
使用棋盘式DNA-DNA杂交技术评估牙科植入物的内部污染情况,并比较铸造或预加工基台的细菌渗漏情况。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):571-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01663.x. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
4
In vitro evaluation of the implant abutment connection sealing capability of different implant systems.不同种植体系统种植体基台连接密封能力的体外评估
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Dec;35(12):917-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01886.x. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
5
Gas permeability: a new quantitative method to assess endodontic leakage.
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2008 Aug;53(4):181-4. doi: 10.1515/BMT.2008.030.
6
Wanted: a base of evidence.需要:证据基础。
J Endod. 2007 Dec;33(12):1401-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.09.004.
7
Bacterial plaque colonization around dental implant surfaces.牙种植体表面周围的细菌菌斑定植。
Implant Dent. 2006 Sep;15(3):298-304. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000226823.58425.19.
8
Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface.由种植体-基台界面定义的种植体周围炎症。
J Dent Res. 2006 May;85(5):473-8. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500515.
9
In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems.不同种植系统种植体-基台界面细菌渗漏的体外评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):875-81.
10
In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system.种植体-基台细菌封闭的体外评估:锁定锥度系统
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):732-7.