• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体-基台细菌封闭的体外评估:锁定锥度系统

In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system.

作者信息

Dibart Serge, Warbington Martha, Su Ming Fan, Skobe Ziedonis

机构信息

Department of Periodontology and Oral Biology, Boston University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):732-7.

PMID:16274147
Abstract

PURPOSE

To test in vitro whether the seal provided by the locking taper used in the implant-abutment connection was capable of preventing the invasion of oral microorganisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five wide-body implants (5 x 11 mm) and 25 abutments were divided into 2 groups for a 2-phase experiment. The first phase tested the ability of the seal to shield the implant well from outside bacteria; the second phase tested the ability of the seal to prevent bacteria present in the implant well from seeping out. For phase 1, 10 implant-abutment units were immersed in a bacterial broth for 24 hours. The abutments were then separated from the implants and bacterial presence was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. In phase 2, the tested abutments were inoculated with a droplet of soft agar bacterial gel and assembled with the implant. These units were incubated in a sterile nutrient broth for 72 hours, sampled, and plated to assess bacterial presence.

RESULTS

In phase 1, no bacteria were detected in any of the implant wells. In phase 2, no bacteria were detected in the nutrient broth or on the agar plates at 72 hours.

DISCUSSION

In implants where a microgap is present, microbial leakage could lead to inflammation and bone loss; thus, it is important to minimize bacterial presence in and around the the implant-abutment junction.

CONCLUSION

The seal provided by the locking taper design has been demonstrated to be hermetic with regard to bacterial invasion in vitro.

摘要

目的

在体外测试种植体-基台连接中使用的锁定锥度所提供的密封是否能够防止口腔微生物的侵入。

材料与方法

将25个宽体种植体(5×11毫米)和25个基台分为两组进行两阶段实验。第一阶段测试密封对种植体免受外部细菌影响的能力;第二阶段测试密封防止种植体内存在的细菌渗出的能力。对于第一阶段,将10个种植体-基台单元浸入细菌培养液中24小时。然后将基台与种植体分离,并使用扫描电子显微镜评估细菌的存在情况。在第二阶段,将测试的基台接种一滴软琼脂细菌凝胶,并与种植体组装。将这些单元在无菌营养肉汤中孵育72小时,取样并接种以评估细菌的存在情况。

结果

在第一阶段,任何种植体内均未检测到细菌。在第二阶段,72小时时在营养肉汤或琼脂平板上均未检测到细菌。

讨论

在存在微间隙的种植体中,微生物渗漏可能导致炎症和骨质流失;因此,尽量减少种植体-基台连接处及其周围的细菌存在非常重要。

结论

锁定锥度设计所提供的密封已被证明在体外对细菌侵入具有密封性。

相似文献

1
In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system.种植体-基台细菌封闭的体外评估:锁定锥度系统
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):732-7.
2
Microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface of Morse taper implants in vitro.体外研究莫氏锥度种植体-基台界面处微生物渗漏
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):328-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01837.x. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
3
In vitro microbiological bacterial seal analysis of the implant/abutment connection in morse taper implants: a comparative study between 2 abutments.体外微生物细菌密封分析莫氏锥度种植体种植体/基台连接:两种基台的对比研究。
Implant Dent. 2010 Apr;19(2):158-66. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181cc48b1.
4
Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model.采用体外动态加载模型研究种植体-基台界面的细菌定植。
J Periodontol. 2011 Apr;82(4):613-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100415. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
5
Influence of repeated screw tightening on bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface.反复拧紧螺钉对种植体-基台界面细菌渗漏的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Dec;20(12):1394-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01769.x. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
6
Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下种植体与钛和氧化锆基台对牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和具核梭杆菌的封闭能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
7
In vitro sealing ability of two materials at five different implant-abutment surfaces.两种材料在五个不同种植体-基台界面的体外封闭能力。
J Periodontol. 2006 Nov;77(11):1828-32. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.060101.
8
Evaluation of implant-abutment microgap and bacterial leakage in five external-hex implant systems: an in vitro study.五种外六角种植体系统中种植体-基台微间隙和细菌渗漏的评估:一项体外研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):346-51.
9
Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.骨水泥固位与螺丝固位种植体-基台连接内部的液体和微生物渗透情况。
J Periodontol. 2001 Sep;72(9):1146-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1146.
10
The bacterial sealing capacity of morse taper implant-abutment systems in vitro.莫氏锥度种植体-基台系统在体外的细菌封闭能力
J Periodontol. 2015 May;86(5):696-702. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.140623. Epub 2015 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Microgap Size and Microbial Microleakage at the Implant Fixture-Abutment Interface in Original and Compatible Abutments.种植体基台与原配基台和适配基台界面处微间隙大小及微生物微渗漏的评估。
Biomed Res Int. 2025 Jul 9;2025:2530986. doi: 10.1155/bmri/2530986. eCollection 2025.
2
Retrospective Study of Functional and Esthetic Outcomes Using Narrow-Diameter Implants for Single Upper Central Incisor Replacements.使用窄直径种植体进行单颗上颌中切牙种植修复的功能和美学效果的回顾性研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;13(4):144. doi: 10.3390/dj13040144.
3
Immediate implantation of simple taper retentive implants in chronic apical infected teeth in the posterior region: a 5-year clinical observation.
在慢性根尖感染的后牙区即刻植入具有简单锥度固位的种植体:一项 5 年的临床观察。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 1;42(6):764-772. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024166.
4
Utilization of Ultrashort Bicon Implants in Clinical Situations: A Retrospective Case Series.临床环境中超短双锥种植体的应用:一项回顾性病例系列研究
Eur J Dent. 2025 May;19(2):544-550. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791786. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
5
Implant Mechanics, Biological Milieu, and Peri-Implantitis: A Narrative Review.种植体力学、生物环境与种植体周围炎:一篇叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 19;16(8):e67173. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67173. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Influence of Connector Design on Displacement and Micromotion in Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Dentures Using Different Lengths and Diameters: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.使用不同长度和直径的牙种植体固定局部义齿中连接体设计对位移和微动的影响:一项三维有限元研究
Materials (Basel). 2024 Sep 7;17(17):4416. doi: 10.3390/ma17174416.
7
Short dental implants in microvascular free flap DCIA: A case report.微血管游离皮瓣 DCIA 中的短牙种植体:病例报告
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 5;10(14):e34177. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34177. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
8
Microbial Leakage through Three Different Implant-Abutment Interfaces on Morse Taper Implants In Vitro.体外研究莫氏锥度种植体上三种不同种植体-基台界面的微生物渗漏情况
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;12(7):226. doi: 10.3390/dj12070226.
9
Influence of an allogenic collagen scaffold on implant sites with thin supracrestal tissue height: a randomized clinical trial.异体胶原支架对薄龈组织高度种植位点的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 15;28(6):313. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05716-0.
10
Short and Extra Short Dental Implants in Osseous Microvascular Free Flaps: A Retrospective Case Series.骨微血管游离皮瓣中短种植体和超短种植体:一项回顾性病例系列研究
J Pers Med. 2024 Apr 3;14(4):384. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040384.