School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Australia.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jun;37(6):1097-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.061. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
To assess quality of vision after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK).
Private practice, United Kingdom.
Case series.
Consecutive patients having bilateral LASEK with a Schwind Amaris laser for myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism completed the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire preoperatively and 5 days, 2 weeks, and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. The outcome measures were QoV scores for symptom frequency, severity, and bothersome. The QoV scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate poorer quality of vision.
The study enrolled 100 consecutive patients (68 myopic, 32 hyperopic). For frequency of symptoms, the mean preoperative QoV score was 6.78 ± 11.45 (SD). Postoperatively, the mean scores at 5 days, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months were 70.71 ± 11.26, 50.55 ± 14.63, 7.15 ± 12.49, and 2.45 ± 6.01, respectively. For severity of symptoms, the mean preoperative QoV score was 6.22 ± 10.52 and the mean postoperative scores were 54.85 ± 12.19, 38.95 ± 11.42, 4.38 ± 7.80, and 1.94 ± 4.64, respectively. For bothersome nature of symptoms, the mean preoperative QoV score was 4.91 ± 9.48 and the mean postoperative scores were 38.97 ± 24.18, 21.90 ± 16.50, 3.61 ± 7.01, and 1.44 ± 4.91, respectively. Post hoc tests found statistically significant differences for all comparisons except between preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups at any time interval.
The quality of vision worsened in the early postoperative period but returned to preoperative levels by 1 month and was better than preoperative levels by 3 months post LASEK.
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
评估激光辅助上皮下角膜切除术(LASEK)后的视力质量。
英国私人诊所。
病例系列。
连续接受 Schwind Amaris 激光治疗近视、远视或散光的双侧 LASEK 的患者,在术前和术后 5 天、2 周、1 个月和 3 个月时完成视觉质量(QoV)问卷。主要终点是症状频率、严重程度和困扰的 QoV 评分。QoV 评分范围为 0 至 100;评分越高,表明视力质量越差。
本研究共纳入 100 例连续患者(68 例近视,32 例远视)。对于症状频率,术前 QoV 平均评分为 6.78±11.45(标准差)。术后 5 天、2 周、1 个月和 3 个月的平均评分分别为 70.71±11.26、50.55±14.63、7.15±12.49 和 2.45±6.01。对于症状严重程度,术前 QoV 平均评分为 6.22±10.52,术后评分分别为 54.85±12.19、38.95±11.42、4.38±7.80 和 1.94±4.64。对于症状的困扰程度,术前 QoV 平均评分为 4.91±9.48,术后评分分别为 38.97±24.18、21.90±16.50、3.61±7.01 和 1.44±4.91。事后检验发现,除术前与术后 1 个月之间外,所有比较均有统计学差异。在任何时间点,两组之间均无统计学差异。
术后早期视力质量恶化,但在 1 个月时恢复到术前水平,3 个月时优于术前水平。
没有作者在文中提到的任何材料或方法上有经济或私人利益。