Department of Plant and Invertebrate Ecology, Centre for Bioenergy and Climate Change, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK.
J Exp Bot. 2011 Jun;62(10):3263-71. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err099. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
Growing crops for bioenergy or biofuels is increasingly viewed as conflicting with food production. However, energy use continues to rise and food production requires fuel inputs, which have increased with intensification. Focussing on the question of food or fuel is thus not helpful. The bigger, more pertinent, challenge is how the increasing demands for food and energy can be met in the future, particularly when water and land availability will be limited. Energy crop production systems differ greatly in environmental impact. The use of high-input food crops for liquid transport fuels (first-generation biofuels) needs to be phased out and replaced by the use of crop residues and low-input perennial crops (second/advanced-generation biofuels) with multiple environmental benefits. More research effort is needed to improve yields of biomass crops grown on lower grade land, and maximum value should be extracted through the exploitation of co-products and integrated biorefinery systems. Policy must continually emphasize the changes needed and tie incentives to improved greenhous gas reduction and environmental performance of biofuels.
种植生物能源作物或生物燃料的做法越来越被视为与粮食生产相冲突。然而,能源需求持续增长,而粮食生产需要燃料投入,这种投入随着集约化程度的提高而增加。因此,关注粮食还是燃料的问题并没有帮助。更大、更相关的挑战是,未来如何满足不断增长的粮食和能源需求,特别是当水和土地的供应将受到限制时。能源作物生产系统在环境影响方面有很大的不同。需要逐步淘汰以高投入粮食作物为原料的液体运输燃料(第一代生物燃料),代之以利用作物残茬和低投入多年生作物(第二代/先进代生物燃料),这些作物具有多种环境效益。需要加大研究力度来提高在较低等级土地上生长的生物质作物的产量,并通过开发副产品和综合生物炼制系统来实现最大价值。政策必须不断强调需要进行的变革,并将激励措施与温室气体减排和生物燃料的环境绩效挂钩。