• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤患者手术系列中结局的预后预测因子。

Prognostic predictors of outcome in an operative series in traumatic brain injury patients.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Cheng-Kung University, Southern Taiwan University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2011 Apr;110(4):258-64. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(11)60038-7.

DOI:10.1016/S0929-6646(11)60038-7
PMID:21540008
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although several prognostic factors for traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been evaluated, a useful predictive scoring model for outcome has yet to be developed for TBI patients. The aim of this study was to determine independent predictors and develop a multivariate logistic regression equation to determine prognosis in TBI patients.

METHODS

A total of 13 different variables were evaluated. All 84 patients in this study were retrospectively evaluated between October 2003 and January 2008 and all underwent craniectomy or craniotomy for hematoma removal and were fitted with intracranial pressure (ICP) microsensor monitors. By using univariate, multiple logistic regression and prognostic regression scoring equations it was possible to draw Receiver-Operating Characteristic curves (ROC) to predict Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 6 months after TBI.

RESULTS

We found that patients over 40 years of age (p < 0.001), unresponsive pre-op pupil reaction (p =0.001), pre-op midline shift (p =0.008), higher injury severity score (ISS; p=0.007), and craniectomy (p < 0.05) were associated with poor outcome in patients with TBI. Using ROC curve to predict the probability of unfavorable outcome, the sensitivity was 97.5% and the specificity was 90.7%.

CONCLUSION

In our preliminary findings, five variables to predict poor outcomes 6 months after TBI were useful. These sensitive variables can be used as a referential guideline in our daily practice to decide whether or not to perform advanced management or avoid decompressive craniectomy.

摘要

背景

尽管已经评估了几种创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的预后因素,但尚未为 TBI 患者开发出有用的预测评分模型。本研究旨在确定独立的预测因素,并建立多元逻辑回归方程来确定 TBI 患者的预后。

方法

共评估了 13 个不同的变量。本研究中的 84 例患者均为回顾性评估,时间为 2003 年 10 月至 2008 年 1 月,所有患者均因血肿清除而行开颅术或颅骨切除术,并配备颅内压(ICP)微传感器监测仪。通过单变量、多变量逻辑回归和预后回归评分方程,可以绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),以预测 TBI 后 6 个月的格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)。

结果

我们发现,年龄超过 40 岁的患者(p < 0.001)、术前无反应的瞳孔反应(p = 0.001)、术前中线移位(p = 0.008)、更高的损伤严重程度评分(ISS;p = 0.007)和开颅术(p < 0.05)与 TBI 患者的不良预后相关。使用 ROC 曲线预测不良结局的概率,敏感性为 97.5%,特异性为 90.7%。

结论

在我们的初步研究结果中,有五个预测 TBI 后 6 个月不良结局的变量是有用的。这些敏感变量可作为我们日常实践中的参考指南,以决定是否进行高级管理或避免减压性颅骨切除术。

相似文献

1
Prognostic predictors of outcome in an operative series in traumatic brain injury patients.创伤性脑损伤患者手术系列中结局的预后预测因子。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2011 Apr;110(4):258-64. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(11)60038-7.
2
Sequential changes in Rotterdam CT scores related to outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury who undergo decompressive craniectomy.接受减压性颅骨切除术的创伤性脑损伤患者的鹿特丹CT评分与预后相关的序贯变化。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;124(6):1640-5. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142760. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
Prognostic Predictors of Early Outcomes and Discharge Status of Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者行去骨瓣减压术后早期结局和出院状态的预后预测因素。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e101-e108. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.246. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
4
Prognostic significance of blood-brain barrier disruption in patients with severe nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy.需要进行减压颅骨切除术的严重非穿透性创伤性脑损伤患者血脑屏障破坏的预后意义。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):674-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.JNS132838. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
5
Effects of Primary Decompressive Craniectomy on the Outcomes of Serious Traumatic Brain Injury with Mass Lesions, and Independent Predictors of Operation Decision.原发性减压性颅骨切除术对伴有占位性病变的严重创伤性脑损伤预后的影响及手术决策的独立预测因素。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e396-e405. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.158. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
6
Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury.严重颅脑损伤所致恶性肿胀行去骨瓣减压术后的结果
J Neurosurg. 2006 Apr;104(4):469-79. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.4.469.
7
Bilateral decompressive craniectomy for patients with malignant diffuse brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injury: a 37-case study.双侧去骨瓣减压术治疗严重颅脑创伤后恶性弥漫性脑肿胀患者:37 例研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2010 Feb;27(2):341-7. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1040.
8
Surgical management of traumatic brain injury: a comparative-effectiveness study of 2 centers.创伤性脑损伤的手术治疗:2 家中心的比较效果研究。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Feb;120(2):434-46. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.JNS13581. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
9
Initial intracranial pressure as a prognosticator in head-injured patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy.初始颅内压对接受减压颅骨切除术的颅脑损伤患者的预后价值
Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 20;7(38):62657-62663. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11632.
10
Outcome following decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury: a 10-year single-center experience with long-term follow up.儿童重型颅脑损伤减压性颅骨切除术后的结果:一项为期10年的单中心长期随访经验。
J Neurosurg. 2007 Apr;106(4 Suppl):268-75. doi: 10.3171/ped.2007.106.4.268.

引用本文的文献

1
Age and pupil size: key predictors of mortality in traumatic brain injury patients with GCS 3.年龄和瞳孔大小:格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3分的创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率的关键预测因素。
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 4;16:1536421. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1536421. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictive Modeling of Long-Term Care Needs in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习对创伤性脑损伤患者长期护理需求进行预测建模
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 25;15(1):20. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010020.
3
Automated pupillometry and optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound to define tuberculous meningitis disease severity and prognosis.
自动化瞳孔测量和视神经鞘直径超声用于定义结核性脑膜炎的疾病严重程度和预后。
J Neurol Sci. 2023 Oct 15;453:120808. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120808. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
A Computer-Assisted System for Early Mortality Risk Prediction in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Emergency Room Triage.一种在急诊室分诊中使用人工智能算法对创伤性脑损伤患者进行早期死亡风险预测的计算机辅助系统。
Brain Sci. 2022 May 7;12(5):612. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050612.
5
Multiple Machine Learning Approaches Based on Postoperative Prediction of Pulmonary Complications in Patients With Emergency Cerebral Hemorrhage Surgery.基于急诊脑出血手术患者肺部并发症术后预测的多种机器学习方法
Front Surg. 2022 Jan 18;8:797872. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.797872. eCollection 2021.
6
A Critical Review for Developing Accurate and Dynamic Predictive Models Using Machine Learning Methods in Medicine and Health Care.关于在医学与医疗保健领域使用机器学习方法开发准确且动态预测模型的批判性综述。
J Med Syst. 2017 Apr;41(4):69. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0715-6. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
7
Infrared pupillometry, the Neurological Pupil index and unilateral pupillary dilation after traumatic brain injury: implications for treatment paradigms.创伤性脑损伤后的红外瞳孔测量、神经瞳孔指数与单侧瞳孔散大:对治疗模式的影响
Springerplus. 2014 Sep 23;3:548. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-548. eCollection 2014.
8
What is New and Innovative in Emergency Neurosurgery? Emerging Diagnostic Technologies Provide Better Care and Influence Outcome: A Specialist Review.急诊神经外科的新进展与创新是什么?新兴诊断技术带来更好的治疗并影响预后:专家综述。
Emerg Med Int. 2013;2013:568960. doi: 10.1155/2013/568960. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
9
Pupillary motility: bringing neuroscience to the psychiatry clinic of the future.瞳孔运动:将神经科学带到未来的精神科临床。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013 Aug;13(8):365. doi: 10.1007/s11910-013-0365-0.